Behavioral evidence for framing effects in the resolution of the doctrinal paradox

Social Choice and Welfare

Volumn 34, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 631-641

  Bonnefon, Jean François ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE TOULOUSE   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77952533813     PISSN: 01761714     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00355-009-0421-5     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Bonnefon JF (2007) How do individuals solve the doctrinal paradox in collective decisions? An empirical study. Psychol Sci 18: 753-755.
2. Bonnefon JF, Villejoubert G (2006) Tactful or doubtful? Expectations of politeness explain the severity bias in the interpretation of probability phrases. Psychol Sci 17: 747-751.
3. Bonnefon JF, Zhang J (2008) The intensity of recent and distant life regrets: an integrative model and a large scale survey. Appl Cogn Psych 22: 653-662.
4. Bonnefon JF, Eid M, Vautier S, Jmel S (2008) A mixed Rasch model of dual-process conditional reasoning. Q J Exp Psychol 61: 809-824.
5. Bovens L, Rabinowicz W (2006) Democratic answers to complex questions-an epistemic perspective. Synthese 150: 131-153.
6. Brennan G (2001) Collective coherence. Int Rev Law Econ 21: 197-211.
7. Cariani F, Pauly M, Snyder J (2008) Decision framing in judgment aggregation. Synthese 163: 1-24.
8. Dietrich F (2006) Judgment aggregation: (im)possibility theorems. J Econ Theory 126: 286-298.
9. Dietrich F, List C (2008) Judgment aggregation without full rationality. Soc Choice Welf 31: 15-39.
10. Goldberg LR, Johnson JA, Eber HW, Hogan R, Ashton MC, Cloninger CR, Gough HC (2006) The international personality item pool and the future of public-domain personality measures. J Res Pers 40: 84-96.
11. Hastie R, Penrod S, Pennington N (1983) Inside the jury. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
12. Hilton DJ, Kemmelmeier M, Bonnefon JF (2005) Putting ifs to work: goal-based relevance in conditional directives. J Exp Psychol Gen 135: 388-405.
13. Judd CM, Kenny DA, McClelland GH (2001) Estimating and testing mediation and moderation in within-subject designs. Psychol Methods 6: 115-134.
14. Kameda T (1991) Procedural influence in small-group decision making: deliberation style and assigned decision rule. J Pers Soc Psychol 61: 245-256.
15. List C (2003) A possibility theorem on aggregation over multiple interconnected propositions. Math Soc Sci 45: 1-13.
16. List C (2005) The probability of inconsistencies in complex collective decisions. Soc Choice Welf 24: 3-32.
17. List C (2006) The discursive dilemma and public reason. Ethics 116: 362-402.
18. List C, Pettit P (2002) Aggregating judgments: an impossibility result. Econ Philos 18: 89-110.
19. List C, Pettit P (2004) Aggregating judgments: two impossibility results compared. Synthese 140: 207-235.
20. Pigozzi G (2005) Two aggregation paradoxes in social decision making: the ostrogorski paradox and the discursive dilemma. Episteme 2: 33-42.
21. Pigozzi G (2006) Belief merging and the discursive dilemma: an argument-based account to paradoxes of judgment aggregation. Synthese 152: 285-298.
22. Regenwetter M, Ho MHR, Tsetlin I (2007) Sophisticated approval voting, ignorance priors, and plurality heuristics: a behavioral social choice analysis in a Thurstonian framework. Psychol Rev 114: 994-1014.
23. Vautier S, Bonnefon J (2008) Is the above-average effect measurable at all? The validity of the self-reported happiness minus other's perceived happiness construct. Appl Psych Meas 32: 575-584.