Is the above-average effect measurable at all? the validity of the self-reported happiness minus others' perceived happiness construct

Applied Psychological Measurement

Volumn 32, Issue 7, 2008, Pages 575-584

  Vautier, Stéphane ^a,b   Bonnefon, Jean François ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE TOULOUSE   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ TOULOUSE JEAN JAURÈS   (France)

Author keywords

Above average effect; Happiness; Latent change; Measurement invariance; Satisfaction With Life Scale; True score difference

Indexed keywords

EID: 51149119698     PISSN: 01466216     EISSN: 15523497     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0146621607310646     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Bonnefon, J.F., & Villejoubert, G. (2006). Tactful or doubtful? Expectations of politeness explain the severity bias in the interpretation of probability phrases. Psychological Science, 17, 747-751.
2. Borsboom, D., Mellenbergh, G.J., & van Heerden, J. (2003). The theoretical status of latent variables. Psychological Review, 110, 203-219.
3. Byrne, B.M., Shavelson, R.J., & Muthn, B.O. (1989). Testing for the equivalence of factor covariance and mean structures: The issue of partial measurement invariance. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 456-466.
4. Chambers, J.R., & Windschitl, P.D. (2004). Biases in social comparative judgments: The role of non-motivated factors in above-average and comparative-optimism effects. Psychological Bulletin, 130, 813-838.
5. Diener, E., Emmons, R.A., Larsen, R.J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The Satisfaction With Life Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 71-76.
6. Eid, M. (2000). A multitrait-multimethod model with minimal assumptions. Psychometrika, 65, 241-261.
7. Eid, M., Lischetzke, T., Nussbeck, F.W., & Trierweiler, L. (2003). Separating trait effects from trait-specific method effects in multitrait-multimethod models: A multiple-indicator CT-C(M-1) model. Psychological Methods, 8, 38-60.
8. Fischer, G.H. (1987). Applying the principles of specific objectivity and of generalizability to the measurement of change. Psychometrika, 52, 565-587.
9. Fischer, G.H., & Ponocny, I. (1994). An extension of the partial credit model with an application of the measurement of change. Psychometrika, 59, 177-192.
10. Klar, Y., & Giladi, E. (1999). Are most people happier than their peers, or are they just happy ? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 586-595.
11. Lykken, D., & Tellegen, A. (1996). Happiness is a stochastic phenomenon. Psychological Science, 7, 186-189.
12. McDonald, R.P. (1999). Test theory: A unified treatment. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
13. Muthn, B.O., & Asparouhov, T. (2002). Latent variable analysis with categorical outcomes: Multiple-group and growth modeling in Mplus (Mplus Web Notes No. 4). Los Angeles: Muthn & Muthn.
14. Muthn, L.K., & Muthn, B.O. (2004). Mplus 3.11 [Computer software]. Los Angeles: Authors.
15. Raykov, T. (1999). Are simple change scores obsolete? An approach to studying correlates and predictors of change. Applied Psychological Measurement, 23, 120-126.
16. Raykov, T. (2001). On the use and utility of the reliability coefficient in social and behavioral sciences. Quality and Quantity, 35, 253-263.
17. Reise, S.P., Widaman, K.F., & Pugh, R.H. (1993). Confirmatory factor analysis and item response theory: Two approaches for exploring measurement invariance. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 552-566.
18. Steyer, R. (1988). Conditional expectations: An introduction to the concept and its applications in empirical sciences. Methodika, 2, 53-78.
19. Steyer, R. (1989). Models of classical psychometric test theory as stochastic measurement models: Representation, uniqueness, meaningful-ness, identifiability, and testability. Methodika, 3, 25-60.
20. Steyer, R., Eid, M., & Schwenkmezger, P. (1997). Modeling true intraindividual change: True change as a latent variable. Methods of Psychological Research Online, 2, 21-33.
21. Takane, Y., & de Leeuw, J. (1987). On the relationship between item response theory and factor analysis of discretized variables. Psychometrika, 52, 393-408.
22. Vautier, S., Mullet, E., & Jmel, S. (2004). Assessing the structural robustness of self-rated satisfaction with life: A SEM analysis. Social Indicators Research, 86, 225-238.
23. Zimmerman, D.W., & Williams, R.H. (1998). Reliability of gain scores under realistic assumptions about properties of pre-test and post-test scores. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 51, 343-351.
24. Zumbo, B.D., & Rupp, A.A. (2004). Responsible modeling of measurement data for appropriate inferences: Important advances in reliability and validity theory. In D. Kaplan (Ed.), The SAGE handbook of quantitative methodology for the social sciences (pp. 73-92). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.