Putting ifs to work: Goal-based relevance in conditional directives

Journal of Experimental Psychology: General

Volumn 134, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 388-405

  Hilton, Denis J ^a   Kemmelmeier, Markus ^b   Bonnefon, Jean François ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ TOULOUSE JEAN JAURÈS   (France)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA   (United States)

Author keywords

Conditionals; Conversation; Pragmatics; Rationality; Reasoning

Indexed keywords

ADULT; COGNITION; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; LEARNING; LOGIC; MALE; MOTIVATION; PROBLEM SOLVING; REVIEW; ROLE PLAYING; SEMANTICS; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; VERBAL BEHAVIOR;

ADULT; COGNITIVE DISSONANCE; COMMUNICATION; FEMALE; GOALS; HUMANS; LOGIC; MALE; MOTIVATION; PROBLEM SOLVING; ROLE; SEMANTICS; SET (PSYCHOLOGY); SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; VERBAL BEHAVIOR;

EID: 24944537839     PISSN: 00963445     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0096-3445.134.3.388     Document Type: Review

References (83)

1. Almor, A., & Sloman, S. (1996). Is deontic reasoning special? Psychological Review, 103, 374-380.
2. Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. Oxford, England: Clarendon Press.
3. Bonnefon, J. F., & Hilton, D. J. (2002). The suppression of modus ponens as a case of pragmatic preconditional reasoning. Thinking & Reasoning, 5(1), 21-40.
4. Bonnefon, J. F., & Hilton, D. J. (2004). Consequential conditionals: Invited and suppressed inferences from valued outcomes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30, 28-37.
5. Braine, M. S., & O'Brien, D. P. (1991). A theory of if: A lexical entry, reasoning program, and pragmatic principles. Psychological Review, 98, 182-203.
6. Cheng, P. W., & Holyoak, K. J. (1985). Pragmatic reasoning schemas. Cognitive Psychology, 17, 391-416.
7. Cosmides, L. (1989). The logic of social exchange: Has natural selection shaped how we reason? Studies with the Wason selection task. Cognition, 31, 187-276.
8. Cummins, D. D. (1996). Evidence for deontic reasoning in 3- and 4-year old children. Memory & Cognition, 24, 823-829.
9. Dixon, P. (1982). Plans and written directions for complex tasks. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 21, 70-84.
10. Evans, J. St. B. T. (1972). Interpretation and matching bias in a reasoning task. British Journal of Psychology, 24, 193-199.
11. Evans, J. St. B. T. (1996). Deciding before you think: Relevance and reasoning in the selection task. British Journal of Psychology, 87, 223-240.
12. Evans, J. St. B. T., Clibbens, J., & Rood, B. (1995). Bias in conditional inference: Implications for mental models and mental logic. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 48A, 644-670.
13. Evans, J. St. B. T., Handley, S. J., & Over, D. E. (2003). Conditionals and conditional probability. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29, 321-335.
14. Evans, J. St. B. T., & Newstead, S. E. (1977). Language and reasoning: A study of temporal factors. Cognition, 8, 265-283.
15. Evans, J. St. B. T., Newstead, S. E., & Byrne, R. M. J. (1993). Human reasoning: The psychology of deduction. Hove, England: Erlbaum.
16. Evans, J. St. B. T., & Over, D. E. (1996). Rationality in the selection task: Epistemic utility versus uncertainty reduction. Psychological Review, 103, 356-363.
17. Evans, J. St. B. T. & Over, D. E. (2004). If Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
18. Evans, J. St. B. T., & Twyman-Musgrove, J. (1998). Conditional reasoning with inducements and advice. Cognition, 69, B11-B16.
19. Ezard, J. (2000, September 26). Officers dismissed radar warning of Exocet attack on H. M. S. Sheffield. The Guardian, p. 43.
20. Fairley, N., Manktelow, K. L., & Over, D. E. (1999). Necessity, sufficiency, and perspective effects in causal conditional reasoning. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 52A, 771-790.
21. Fiddick, L. (2000). A word of precaution: Not all deontic rules support perspective effects on the Wason selection task. Unpublished manuscript.
22. Fiddick, L., Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (2000). No interpretation without representation: The role of domain-specific representations in the Wason selection task. Cognition, 77, 1-79.
23. Fillenbaum, S. (1978). How to do some things with IF. In J. W. Cotton & R. L. Klatzky (Eds.), Semantic factors in cognition (pp. 169-214). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
24. Friedrich, J. (1993). Primary error detection and minimization (PEDMIN) strategies in social cognition: A reinterpretation of confirmation bias phenomena. Psychological Review, 100, 298-319.
25. Gärdenfors, P. (2003). How homo became sapiens. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
26. George, C. (1991). Facilitation in the Wason selection task with a consequent referring to an unsatisfactory outcome. British Journal of Psychology, 82, 463-472.
27. Gigerenzer, G., & Hug, K. (1992). Domain specific reasoning, social contracts, and perspective change. Cognition, 43, 127-171.
28. Girotto, V. (1995). Contextual factors in deontic reasoning. Thinking and Reasoning, 1, 333-338.
29. Girotto, V., Kemmelmeier, M., Sperber, D., & van der Henst, J. B. (2001). Inept reasoners or pragmatic virtuosos? Relevance and the deontic selection task. Cognition, 81, B69-B76.
30. Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantic: 3. Speech acts (pp. 41-58). New York: Academic Press.
31. Harris, P. L. (1996). Beliefs, desires and language. In P. Carruthers & P. K. Smith (Eds.), Theories of theories of mind (pp. 200-220). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
32. Harris, P. L., & Núñez, M. (1996. Understanding of permission rules by preschool children. Child Development, 67, 1572-1591.
33. Higgins, E. T. (2000). Making a good decision: Value from fit. American Psychologist, 55, 1217-1230.
34. Hilpinen, R. (2001). Deontic logic. In L. Goble (Ed.), The Blackwell guide to philosophical logic (pp. 159-182). Oxford, England: Blackwell.
35. Hilton, D. J. (1995). The social context of reasoning: Conversational inference and rational judgment. Psychological Bulletin, 118, 248-271.
36. Holyoak, K. J., & Cheng, P. W. (1995). Pragmatic reasoning with a point of view. Thinking and Reasoning, 1, 289-313.
37. Jackson, F. (Ed.). (1991). Conditionals. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
38. Johnson-Laird, P. N., & Byrne, R. M. J. (2002). Conditionals: A theory of meaning, pragmatics, and inference. Psychological Review, 109, 646-678.
39. Kenny, A. (1966). Practical inference. Analysis, 26, 65-75.
40. Kirby, K. N. (1994). Probabilities and utilities of fictional outcomes in Wason's four-card selection task. Cognition, 51, 1-28.
41. Klauer, K. C. (1999). On the normative justification for information gain in Wason's selection task. Psychological Review, 106, 215-222.
42. Levinson, S. C. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
43. Levinson, S. C. (2000). Presumptive meanings: The theory of generalized conversational implicature. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
44. Lewicka, M. (1989). Towards a pragmatic perspective of cognition: Does evaluative meaning influence rationality on lay inferences? Polish Psychological Bulletin, 20, 267-285.
45. Liberman, N., & Klar, Y. (1996). Hypothesis-testing in Wason's selection task: Social exchange, cheating detection or task understanding. Cognition, 58, 127-156.
46. Light, P., Girotto, V., & Legrenzi, P. (1990). Children's reasoning on conditional promises and permissions. Cognitive Development, 5, 369-383.
47. Luria, A. R. (1959). The directive function of speech in development and dissolution: Part I. Word, 15, 341-352.
48. Luria, A. R., & la Yudovich, F. I. (1956). Speech and the development of mental processes in the child. Harmondsworth, England: Penguin.
49. Lyons, J. (1977). Semantics (Vol. 1). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
50. Manktelow, K. I., & Over, D. E. (1991). Social roles and utilities in reasoning with deontic conditionals. Cognition, 39, 85-105.
51. McKenzie, C. R. M., Fereira, V. S., Mikkelsen, L. A., McDermott, K. J., & Skrable, R. P. (2001). Do conditional hypotheses target rare events? Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 35, 291-309.
52. Oaksford, M., & Chater, N. (1994). A rational analysis of the selection task as optimal data selection. Psychological Review, 101, 608-631.
53. Oaksford, M., & Chater, N. (1995). Information gain explains relevance, which explains the selection task. Cognition, 57, 97-108.
54. Oaksford, M., Chater, N., & Grainger, B. (1999). Probabilistic effects in data selection. Thinking and Reasoning, 5, 193-243.
55. Oaksford, M., Chater, N., & Larkin, J. (2000). Probabilities and polarity biases in conditional inference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 883-899.
56. Ormerod, T. C., Manktelow, K. I., & Jones, G. V. (1993). Reasoning with three types of conditional: Biases and mental models. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 46A, 653-677.
57. Over, D. E., Manktelow, K. I., & Hadjichristidis, C. (2004). Conditions for the acceptance of deontic conditionals. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58, 96-105.
58. Perham, N., & Oaksford, M. (2003). Adaptation or adaptability in deontic reasoning. Unpublished manuscript, University of Wales at Cardiff, United Kingdom.
59. Politzer, G., & Nguyen-Xuan, A. (1992). Reasoning about conditional promises and warnings: Darwinian algorithms, mental models, relevance judgments or pragmatic schemas? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 44A, 401-421.
60. Roth, P. (2002). The human stain. London: Vintage Books.
61. Schaeken, W., & Schroyens, W. (2000). The effect of explicit negatives and of different contrast classes on conditional syllogisms. British Journal of Psychology, 91, 533-550.
62. Schank, R. C., & Abelson, R. P. (1977). Scripts, plans, goals and understanding: An enquiry into human knowledge structures. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
63. Schroyens, W. J., Schaeken, W., & d'Ydewalle, G. (2001). The processing of negations in conditional reasoning: A meta-analytic study in mental model and/or mental logic theory. Thinking and Reasoning, 7, 121-172.
64. Sperber, D. (2001). An evolutionary perspective on testimony and argumentation. Philosophical Topics, 29, 401-413.
65. Sperber, D., Cara, F., & Girotto, V. (1995). Relevance theory explains the selection task. Cognition, 57, 31-95.
66. Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (1986). Relevance: Communication and cognition. Oxford, England: Blackwell.
67. Staller, A., Sloman, S. A., & Ben-Zeev, T. (2000). Perspective effects in nondeontic versions of the Wason selection task. Memory & Cognition, 28, 396-405.
68. Staudenmayer, H. (1975). Understanding reasoning with meaningful propositions. In R. J. Falmagne (Ed.), Reasoning: Representation and process (pp. 55-79). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
69. Stevenson, R. J., & Over, D. E. (1995). Deduction from uncertain premises. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 48A, 613-643.
70. Stevenson, R. J., & Over, D. E. (2001). Reasoning from uncertain premises: Effects of expertise and conversational context. Thinking and Reasoning, 7, 367-390.
71. Strawson, P. F. (1952). Introduction to logical theory. London: Methuen.
72. Strawson, P. F. (1964). Intention and convention in speech acts. Philosophical Review, 73, 439-460.
73. Thompson, V. A. (1994). Interpretational factors in conditional reasoning. Memory & Cognition, 22, 742-758.
74. Thompson, V. A. (2000). The task-specific nature of domain-general reasoning. Cognition, 76, 209-268.
75. Thompson, V. A., & Mann, J. M. (1995). Perceived necessity explains the dissociation between logic and meaning: The case of "only if." Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 1554-1567.
76. Vygotsky, L. S. (1962). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
77. Wason, P. C. (1965). The contexts of plausible denial. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 4, 7-11.
78. Wason, P. C., & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1972). The psychology of reasoning. London: Batsford.
79. Weber, E. U., & Hilton, D. J. (1990). Contextual effects in the interpretation of probability words: Perceived base-rate and severity of events. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 781-789.
80. Wilensky, R. C. (1983). Planning and understanding: A computational approach to human reasoning. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.
81. Wilson, D., & Sperber, D. (2004). Relevance theory. In G. Ward & L. Horn (Eds.), Handbook of pragmatics (pp. 607-632). Oxford, England: Blackwell.
82. Wright, P., & Hull, A. J. (1986). Answering questions about negative conditionals. Journal of Memory and Language, 25, 691-709.
83. Wright, P., & Wilcox, P. (1979). When two no's nearly make a yes: A study of conditional imperatives. In P. A. Kolers, M. E. Wrolstad, & H. Bouma (Eds.), Processing of visible language 1 (pp. 413-430). New York: Plenum Press.