Judgment aggregation without full rationality

Social Choice and Welfare

Volumn 31, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 15-39

  Dietrich, Franz ^a   List, Christian ^b  

^a MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b LONDON SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 43749108854     PISSN: 01761714     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00355-007-0260-1     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Alchourron CE, Gärdenfors P, Makinson D (1985) On the logic of theory change: partial meet contraction and revision functions. J Symbolic Logic 50:510-530
2. Dietrich F (2006) Judgment Aggregation: (Im)Possibility Theorems. J Econ Theory 126(1):286-298
3. Dietrich F (2007) A generalised model of judgment aggregation. Soc Choice Welfare 28(4):529-565
4. Dietrich F, List C (2007a) Arrow's theorem in judgment aggregation. Soc Choice Welfare 29(1):19-33
5. Dietrich F, List C (2007b) Judgment aggregation by quota rules: majority voting generalized. J Theor Polits 19(4) (in press)
6. Dietrich F, List C (2007c) Strategy-proof judgment aggregation. Econ Philos (in press)
7. Dokow E, Holzman R (2005) Aggregation of binary evaluations. Working paper, Technion Israel Institute of Technology
8. Dokow E, Holzman R (2006) Aggregation of binary evaluations with abstentions. Working paper, Technion Israel Institute of Technology
9. Gärdenfors P (2006) An Arrow-like theorem for voting with logical consequences. Econ Philos 22(2):181-190
10. Kasher A, Rubinstein A (1997) On the Question "Who is a J?": a social choice approach. Log Anal 160:385-395
11. Konieczny S, Pino-Perez R (2002) Merging information under constraints: a logical framework. J Logic Comput 12:773-808
12. Kornhauser LA, Sager LG (1986) Unpacking the Court. Yale Law J 96(1):82-117
13. List C (2004) A model of path-dependence in decisions over multiple propositions. Am Polit Sci Rev 98(3):495-513
14. List C (2007) Which worlds are possible? A judgment aggregation problem. J Philosophical Logic (in press)
15. List C, Pettit P (2002) Aggregating sets of judgments: an impossibility result. Econ Philos 18:89-110
16. List C, Pettit P (2004) Aggregating Sets of Judgments: Two Impossibility Results Compared. Synthese 140(1-2):207-235
17. List C, Pettit P (2006) Group agency and supervenience. Southern J Philos XLIV (Spindel Supplement):85-105
18. Mongin P (2005) Factoring out the impossibility of logical aggregation. Working paper, CNRS, Paris
19. Nehring K (2003) Arrow's theorem as a corollary. Econ Lette 80(3):379-382
20. Nehring K, Puppe C (2002) Strategy-proof social choice on single-peaked domains: possibility, impossibility and the space between. Working paper, University of California at Davies
21. Nehring K, Puppe C (2005) Consistent judgment aggregation: a characterization. Working paper, University of Karlsruhe
22. Pauly M, van Hees M (2006) Logical constraints on judgment aggregation. J Philos Logic 35:569-585
23. Pettit P (2001) Deliberative democracy and the discursive dilemma. Philos Issues 11:268-299
24. Rubinstein A, Fishburn P (1986) Algebraic aggregation theory. J Econ Theory 38:63-77
25. Samet D, Schmeidler D (2003) Between liberalism and democracy. J Econ Theory 110:213-233
26. van Hees M (2007) The limits of epistemic democracy. Soc Choice Welfare 28(4):649-666
27. Wilson R (1975) On the theory of aggregation. J Econ Theory 10:89-99