Involuntary attention: Clinical and electrophysiological aspects;La atención involuntaria: Aspectos clínicos y electrofisiológicos

Revista Ecuatoriana de Neurologia

Volumn 18, Issue 1-2, 2009, Pages

  Solís Vivanco, Rodolfo ^a   Ricardo Garcell, Josefina ^b   Rodríguez Agudelo, Yaneth ^a  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF NEUROLOGY AND NEUROSURGERY   (Mexico)

^b UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL AUTÓNOMA DE MÉXICO   (Mexico)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGE; ALCOHOLISM; ATTENTION; ATTENTION DEFICIT DISORDER; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; HUMAN; MISMATCH NEGATIVITY; ORIENTING REFLEX; REVIEW; THEORETICAL MODEL; TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY;

EID: 77952494779     PISSN: 10198113     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (110)

1. Posner M, Petersen S. The attention system of the human brain. Ann Rev Neurosci 1990; 13(25-42).
2. Bench C, Frith C, Grasby P. Investigations of the functional anatomy of attention using the Stroop test. Neuropsychologia 1993; 31:907-922. (Pubitemid 23283776)
3. Estévez-González A, García-Sánchez C, Junqué C. La atención: una compleja función cerebral. Rev de Neurol 1997; 25(148):1989-1997. (Pubitemid 28105695)
4. Escera C, Alho K, Schröger E, Winkler I. Involuntary attention and distractibility as evaluated with event-related brain potentials. Audiol Neurootol 2000; 5:151-166. (Pubitemid 30312184)
5. Broadbent D. Perception and communication. Nueva York: Pergamon Press, 1958.
6. Näätänen R. Attention and brain function. Erlbaum: Hillsdale, 1992.
7. Corsi M. Atención y sueño, en La atención y sus alteraciones, González-Garrido, A and Ramos-Loyo, J, Editors.: Mexico City:Manual Moderno, 2006.
8. Coull J. Neural correlates of attention and arousal: insights from electrophysiology, functional neuroimaging and psychopharmacology. Prog Neurobiol 1998; 55:343-361. (Pubitemid 28255041)
9. Meneses S. Mecanismos de la atención: una aproximación electrofisiológica, en La atención y sus alteraciones, González, A and Ramos, J, Editors.: México:Manual Moderno, 2006.
10. Mesulam M. A cortical network for directed attention and unilateral neglect. Ann Neurol 1981; 10:309-325. (Pubitemid 11027068)
11. Mirsky A. Behavioral and psychophysiological markers of disordered attention. Environ Health Pers 1987; 74:191-199.
12. Escera C. Evaluación de disfunciones neurocognitivas con potenciales evocados. Rev Psiquiatr Fac Med Bar 2002; 29(6):362-373.
13. Sokolov E. Perception and the conditioned reflex. Oxford, UK: Pergamon, 1963.
14. Schröger E. On the detection of auditory deviations: a pre-attentive activation model. Psychophysiology 1997; 34:245-257.
15. Coren S, Ward L, Enns J, Sensación y percepción. 2001, Mc Graw Hill: Mexico City.
16. Rains D. Principios de neuropsicología humana. México: McGraw Hill, 2004.
17. Rohrbaugh J. The orienting reflex: performance and central nervous system manifestations, en Varieties of attention, Parasuranam, R and Davies, D, Editors.: Orlando:Academic Press, 1984.
18. Sokolov E. The neuronal mechanisms of the orientating reflex, en Neuronal mechanisms of the orienting reflex, Sokolov, E and Vinogradova, O, Editors.: New York:Wiley, 1975.
19. Donchin E. Surprise!...surprise? Psychophysiology 1981; 18:493-513.
20. Luria A. Atención y memoria. España: Fontanella, 1975.
21. Escera C. Mecanismos cerebrales de la reorientación atencional involuntaria: potencial de disparidad (MMN), N1 y P3a. Psicothema 1997; 9:555-568
22. Näätänen R. The role of attention in auditory information processing as revealed by event-related potentials and other brain measures of cognitive function. Behav Brain Sci 1990; 13:281-288.
23. Schröger E, Wolff C. Attentional orienting and reorienting is indicated by human event-related brain potentials. Neuroreport 1998; 9:3355-3358. (Pubitemid 28566110)
24. Friedman D, Cycowicz Y, Gaeta H. The novelty P3a: an event related brain potential (ERP) sign of the brain's evaluation of novelty. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2001; 25:355-373.
25. Polich J, Criado J. Neuropsychology and neuropharmacology of the P3a and P3b. Int J Psychophysiol 2006; 60:172-185.
26. Horváth J, Czigler I, Birkás E, Winkler I, Gervai J. Age-related differences in distraction and reorientation in an auditory task. Neurobiology 2007; In press.
27. Winkler I, Karmos G, Näätänen R. Adaptative modeling of the unattended acoustic environment reflected in the mismatch negativity event-related potential. Brain Res 1996; 742:239-253.
28. Näätänen R, Winkler I. The concept of auditory stimulus representation in cognitive neuroscience. Psychol. Bull. 1999; 125:826-859.
29. Escera C, Alho K, Winkler I, Näätänen R. Neural mechanisms of involuntary attention to acoustic novelty and change. J Cogn Neurosci 1998; 10:590-604.
30. Näätänen R, Paavilainen P, Rinne T, Alho K. The mismatch negativity (MMN) in basic research of central auditory processing: a review. Clin Neurophysiol 2007; 118:2544-2590.
31. Schröger E, Giard M, Wolff C. Auditory distraction: event related potential and behavioral indices. Clin Neurophysiol 2000; 111:1450-1460.
32. Munka L, Berti S. Examining task-dependencies of different attentional processes as reflected in the P3a and reorienting negativity components of the human event-related brain potential. Neurosci Lett 2006; 396:177-181.
33. Luck S, Woodman G, Vogel E. Event-related potential studies of attention. Trends Cogn Sci 2000; 4(11):432-440.
34. Luck S. An introduction to event-related potential tecnique. Londres: The MIT Press, 2005.
35. Rugg M, Coles M. Electrophysiology of mind. Nueva York: Oxford University Press, 1995.
36. Jasper H. The ten-twenty electrode system fo the International Federation. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1958; 10:371-375.
37. Hillyard S, Kutas M. Electrophysiology of cognitive processing. Annu Rev Psychol 1983; 34:590-604.
38. Escera C, Yago E, Alho K. Electrical responses reveal the temporal dynamics of brain events during involuntary attention switching. Eur J Neurosci 2001; 14:877-883. (Pubitemid 35300654)
39. Escera C, Corral M, Yago E. An electrophysiological and behavioral investigation of involuntary attention towards auditory frequency, duration and intensity changes. Cogn Brain Res 2002; 14:325-332. (Pubitemid 35283784)
40. Schröger E, Wolff C. Behavioral and electrophysiological effects of task-irrelevant sound change: a new distraction paradigm. Cogn Brain Res 1998; 7:71-87. (Pubitemid 28419440)
41. Berti S, Schröger E. Working memory controls involuntary attention switching: evidence from an auditory distraction paradigm. Ann Neurol 2003; 7:329-335.
42. Näätänen R, Alho K. Mismatch negativity- the measure of central sound representation accuracy. Audiol Neurootol 1997; 2:341-353.
43. Vol.18, No1-2, 2009 / Revista Ecuatoriana de Neurología 103
44. Picton T, Alain C, Otten L, Ritter W, Achim A. Mismatch negativity: different water in the same river. Audiol Neurootol 2000; 5:111-139. (Pubitemid 30312182)
45. Escera C, Grau C. Short-term replication for the mismatch negativity. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1996; 100:549-554.
46. Amenedo E, Escera C. The accuracy of sound duration representation in the human brain determines the accuracy of behavioral perception. Eur J Neurosci 2000; 12:2570-2574. (Pubitemid 30497050)
47. Kok A. Age-related changes in involuntary and voluntary attention as reflected in components fo the event-related potential (ERP). Biol Psychol 2000; 54:107-143.
48. Dehaene-Lambertz G. Electrophysiological correlates of categorical phoneme perception in adults. Neuroreport 1997; 8:919-924. (Pubitemid 27152147)
49. Tervaniemi M, Saarinen J, Paavilainen P, Danilova N, Näätä nen R. Temporal integration of auditory information in sensory memory as reflected by the mismatch negativity. Biol Psych 1994; 38:157-167. (Pubitemid 24313395)
50. Sams M, Kaukoranta E, Hämäläinen M, Näätä nen R. Cortical activity elicited by changes in auditory stimuli: differente sources for the magnetic N100m and mismatch reponses. Psychophysiology 1991; 1991(28):21-29.
51. Rosburg T, Trautner P, Dietl T, Korzyukov O, Boutros N, Schaller C. Subdural recordings of the mismatch negativity (MMN) in patients with focal epilepsy. Brain 2005; 128:819-828. (Pubitemid 40516919)
52. Rinne T, Degerman A, Alho K. Superior temporal and inferior frontal cortices are activated by infrequent sound duration decrements: an fMRI study. Neuroimage 2005; 26:66-72.
53. Müller B, Jüptner M, Jentzen W, Müller S. Cortical activation to auditory mismatch elicited by infrequent deviatn and complex novel sounds: a PET study. Neuroimage 2002; 17:231-239.
54. Alho K, Woods D, Algazi A, Knight R, Näätänen R. Lesions of frontal cortex diminish the auditory mismatch negativity. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1994; 91:353-362.
55. Baldeweg T, Williams J, Gruzelier J. Differential changes in frontal and sub-temporal components of mismatch negativity. Int J Psychophysiol 1999; 33:143-148.
56. Rinne J, Portin R, Ruottinen H, Nurmi E, Bergman J, Haaparanta M, Solin O. Cognitive impairment and the brain dopaminergic system in Parkinson's disease: a [18F]-fluorodopa PET study. Arch Neurol 2000; 57:470-475.
57. Kwon J, Youn T, Park H, Kong S, Kim M. Temporal association of MMN multiple generators: high density recordings (128 channels). Int Cong Ser 2002; 1232:335-338.
58. Jääskeläinen I, Alho K, Escera C, Winkler I, Sillanaukee P, Näätänen R. Effects of ethanol and auditory distraction on forced choice reaction time. Alcohol 1996; 13:153-156.
59. Kähkönen S, Ahveninen J, Pekkonen E, Kaakkola S, Huttunen J, Ilmoniemi R, al e. Dopamine modulates involuntary attention shifting and reorientation. An electromagnetic study. Clin Neurophysiol 2002; 113:1894-1902.
60. Kähkönen S, Mäkinen V, Jääskeläinen I, Pennanen S, Liesivuori J, Ahveninen J. Serotoninergic modulation of mismatch negativity. Psychiatry Res: Neuroimag 2005; 138:61-74.
61. Lyytinen H, Blomberg A, Näätänen R. Event-related potentials and autonomic responses to a change in unattended auditory stimuli. Psychophysiology 1992; 29:523-534.
62. Harmony T, Bernal J, Fernández T, Silva-Pereyra J, Fernández- Bouzas A, Marosi E, al e. Primary task demands modulate P3a amplitude. Cogn Brain Res 2000; 9:53-60.
63. Restuccia D, Della Marca G, Marra C, Rubino M, Valeriani M. Attentional load of the primary task influences the frontal but not the temporal generators of the mismatch negativity. Cogn Brain Res 2005; 25:891-899.
64. Sussman E, Winkler I, Schröger E. Top-down control over involuntary attention switching in the auditory modality Psychon Bull Rev 2003; 10:630-637.
65. Courchesne E, Hylliard S, Galambos R. Stimulus novelty, task relevance, and the visual evoked potentials in man. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1975; 39:131-143.
66. Fabiani M, Friedman D. Changes in brain activity patterns in aging: The novelty oddball. Psychophysiology 1995; 32:579-594.
67. Núñez-Peña M, Corral J, Escera C. Potenciales evocados cerebrales en el contexto de la investigación psicológica: una actualización. Anu Psicol 2004; 35(1):3-21.
68. Polich J. Updating P300: an integrative theory of P3a and P3b. Clin neurophysiol 2007; 118:2128-2148.
69. Knight R. Evoked potential studies of attention capacity in human frontal lobe lesions, en Frontal lobe function and dysfunction, Levin, H, Eisenberg, H, and Benton, A, Editors.: Nueva York:Oxford University Press, 1991p. 139-153.
70. Knight R. Decreased response to novel stimuli after prefrontal lesions in man. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1984; 59:9-20.
71. Knight R, Grabowecky M, Scabini D. Role of human prefrontal cortex in attention control Adv Neurol 1995; 66:21-34.
72. Daffner K, Mesulam M, Seinto L, Acar D, Calvo V, Faust Rea. The central role of the prefrontal cortex in directing attention to novel events. Brain 2000; 123:927-939. (Pubitemid 30224189)
73. Knight R. Contribution of human hippocampal region to novelty detection. Nature 1996; 383:256-259. (Pubitemid 26317674)
74. Yamaguchi S, Knight R. Effects of temporal-parietal lesions on the somatosensory P3 to lower limb stimulation. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1992; 78:50-55.
75. McCarthy G, Luby M, Gore J, Goldman-Rakic P. Infrequent events transiently activate human prefrontal and parietal cortex as measured by fMRI. Neurophysiol 1997; 77:1630-1634.
76. Menon V, Ford J, Lim K, Glover G, Pfefferbaum A. Combined event-related fMRI and EEG evidence for temporal-parietal cortex activation during target detection. Neuroreport 1997; 8:3029-3037. (Pubitemid 27421727)
77. Swasono S, Machado L, Knight R. Predictive value of novel stimuli modifies visual event-related potentials and behavior. Clin Neurophysiol 2000; 111:29-39.
78. Hansenne M. The P300 cognitive event-related potential. II. Individual variability and clinical application in psychophysiology Neurophysiol Clin 2000; 30:211-231.
79. Stanzione P, Fattaposta F, Guiunti P. P300 variations in Parkinsonian patients before and during dopaminergis monotherapy: a suggested dopamine component in P300. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1991; 80:446-453.
80. Trenkwalder C, Winkelmann J. Pathophysiology of the restless legs syndrome, en Sleep and movement disorders, Chocroverty, S, Hening, W, and Walters, A, Editors.: Philadelphia:Butterworth/Henemann, 2003p. 322-332.
81. Takeshita S, Ogura C. Effect of the dopamine D2 antagonist sulpiride on event-related potentials and its relation to the law of the initial value. Int J Psychophysiol 1994; 16:99-106. (Pubitemid 24074503)
82. Hill S, Locke J, Zezza N, Kaplan B, Neiswanger K, Steinhauer Sea. Geneti association between reduced P300 amplitude and the DRD2 dopamine receptor A1 allele in children at high risk for alcoholism. Biol Psych 1998; 43:40-51. (Pubitemid 28059071)
83. Friedman D, Simpson G. ERP amplitude and scalp distribution to target and novel events: effects of temporal order in young, middle-aged and older adults. Cogn Brain Res 1994; 2:49-63. (Pubitemid 24244696)
84. Grillon C, Courchesne E, Ameli R, Geyer M, Braff D. Increased distractibility in schizophrenic patients. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1991; 47:171-179.
85. Gaeta H, Friedman D, Ritter W, Cheng J. An event-related potential evaluation of involuntary attentional shifts in the young and elderly. Psychol Aging 2001; 16:55-68. (Pubitemid 32232976)
86. Yago E, Escera C, Alho K, Giard M. Cerebral mechanisms undelying orienting of attention towards auditory frequency changes. Neuroreport 2001; 12:2583-2587. (Pubitemid 32682226)
87. Berti S, Schröger E. A comparison of auditory and visual distraction effects: behavioural and event-related indices. Cogn brain research 2001; 10:265-273. (Pubitemid 32146583)
88. Cheour M, Korpilahti B, Martynova O, Lang A. Mismatch negativity and late discrimination negativity in investigating speech perception and learning in children and infants. Audiol Neuro-otol 2001; 6:2-11. (Pubitemid 32098416)
89. Wetzel N, Windmann A, Berti S, Schröger E. The development of involuntary and voluntary attention from childhood to adulthood: a combined behavioral and event-related potential study. Clin Neurophysiol 2006; 117:2191-2203. (Pubitemid 44333275)
90. Ceponiene R, Lepisto T, Soininen M, Aronen E, Alku P, Näätänen R. Event-related potentials associated with sound discrimination versus novelty detection in children. Psychophysiology 2004; 41:130-141.
91. Luria A. Higher cortical functions in man. New York: Basic Books, 1980.
92. Lezak M. Neuropsychological assessment, 4th ed., EUA: Oxford University Press, 2004.
93. Jääskeläinen I, Varonen R, Näätänen R, Pekkonen E. Decay of cortical pre-attentive sound discrimination in middled aged. Neuroreport 1999; 10:123-126.
94. Ahveninen J, Escera C, Polo M, Grau C, Jääskeläinen I. Acute and chronic effects of alcohol on preattentive auditory processing as reflected by mismatch negativity. Audiol Neurootol 2000; 5:303-311.
95. Ahveninen J, Jääskeläinen I, Pekkonen E, Hallberg A, Hietanen M, Näätänen R, Schröger E, Sillanaukee P. Increased distractibility by task-irrelevant sound changes in abstinent alcoholics. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 2000; 24:1850-1854.
96. Kaasinen V, Rinne J. Functional imaging studies of dopamine system and cognition in normal aging and Parkinson's disease. Neurosc Biobehav Rev 2002; 26:758-793.
97. Berti S, Roeber U, Schröger E. Bottom-up influences on working memory: behavioral and electrophysiological distraction varies with distractor strength. Exp Psychol 2004; 51:249-257.
98. Bendixen A, Roeber U, Schröger E. Regularity extraction and application in dynamic auditory processing sequences. J Cog Neurosc 2007; 19:1664-1677.
99. Winkler I, Tervaniemi M, Schröger E, Wolff C, Näätä nen R. Preattentive processing of auditory spatial information in humans. Neurosci Letters 1998; 242:49-52.
100. Csépe V. On the origin and development of the mismatch negativity. Ear Hear 1995; 16:91-104.
101. Lang A, Earola O, Korpilahti B, Holopainen I, Salo S, Aaltonen O. Practical issues in the clinical application of mismatch negativity. Ear Hear 1995; 16:118-130.
102. Batty M, Taylor M. Visual categorization during childhood: an ERP study. Psychophysiology 2002; 38:482-490.
103. Bertoli S, Smurzynski J, Probst R. Temporal resolution in young and elderly subejcts as measured by mismatch negativity and a psychoacoustic gap deteciotn task. Clin Neurophysiol 2002; 113:396-406.
104. Cooper R, Todd J, McGill K, Michie P. Auditory sensory memory and the aging brain: a mismatch negativity study. Neurobiol Aging 2006; 27:91-104.
105. Czigler I, Pató L, Poszet E, László B. Age and novelty: event-related potentials to visual stimuli within an auditory oddball-visual detection task. Int J Psychophysiol 2006; 62:290-299.
106. Madden D, Langley L. Age-related changes in selective attention an perceptual load during visual search. Psychol Aging 2003; 18:54-67.
107. Polo M, Newton P, Rogers D, Escera C, Butler S. ERPs and behavioral indices of long-term preattentive and attentive deficits after closed head injury. Neuropsychologia 2002; 40:2350-2359.
108. Polo M, Yago E, Gual A, Grau C, Alho K, Escera C. Abnormal activation of cerebral networks of orienting to novelty in chronic alcoholics. Psychophysiology 1999; 36:S90.
109. Polo M, Escera C, Yago E, Alho K, Gual A, C G. Electrophysiological evidence of abnormal activation of the cerebral network of involuntary attention in alcoholism. Clin Neurophysiol 2003; 114:134-146.
110. Gumenyuk V, Korzyukov O, Escera C, Hämäläinen M, Huotilainen M, Häyrinen T, Oksanen H, Näätänen R, von Wendt L, Alho K. Electrophysiological evidence of enhanced distractibility in ADHD children. Neurosci Lett 2005; 374(3):212-217.