Age-related changes in selective attention and perceptual load during visual search

Psychology and Aging

Volumn 18, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 54-67

  Madden, David J ^a   Langley, Linda K ^a  

^a DUKE UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE; AGED; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISTRACTIBILITY; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; NORMAL HUMAN; PERCEPTION; REACTION TIME; TASK PERFORMANCE; THEORY; VISUAL ACUITY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; AGING; ATTENTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 0037336347     PISSN: 08827974     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0882-7974.18.1.54     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Anderson, N. D. (1999). The attentional demands of encoding and retrieval in younger and older adults: 2. Evidence from secondary task reaction time distributions. Psychology and Aging, 14, 645-655.
2. Bacon, W. F., & Egeth, H. E. (1994). Overriding stimulus-driven attentional capture. Perception & Psychophysics, 55, 485-496.
3. Burke, D. M. (1997). Language, aging, and inhibitory deficits: Evaluation of a theory. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 52B, P254-P264.
4. Cerella, J. (1985). Age-related decline in extrafoveal letter perception. Journal of Gerontology, 40, 727-736.
5. Craik, F. I. M., & Byrd, M. (1982). Aging and cognitive deficits: The role of attentional resources. In F. I. M. Craik & S. Trehub (Eds.), Aging and cognitive processes (pp. 191-211). New York: Plenum.
6. Eriksen, B. A., & Eriksen, C. W. (1974). Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task. Perception & Psychophysics, 16, 143-149.
7. Eriksen, C. W. (1995). The flankers task and response competition: A useful tool for investigating a variety of cognitive problems. Visual Cognition, 2, 101-118.
8. Eriksen, C. W., & Schultz, D. W. (1979). Information processing and visual search: A continuous flow conception and experimental results. Perception & Psychophysics, 25, 249-263.
9. Eriksen, C. W., & Yeh, Y.-Y. (1985). Allocation of attention in the visual field. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 11, 583-597.
10. Folk, C. L., & Lincourt, A. E. (1996). The effects of age on guided conjunction search. Experimental Aging Research, 22, 99-118.
11. Flowers, J. H. (1990). Priming effects in perceptual classification. Perception & Psychophysics, 47, 135-148.
12. Grice, G. R., & Gwynne, J. W. (1985). Temporal characteristics of noise conditions producing facilitation and interference. Perception & Psychophysics, 37, 495-501.
13. Hahn, S., & Kramer, A. F. (1995). Attentional flexibility and aging: You don't need to be 20 years of age to split the beam. Psychology and Aging, 10, 597-609.
14. Handy, T. C., & Mangun, G. R. (2000). Attention and spatial selection: Electrophysiological evidence for modulation by perceptual load. Perception & Psychophysics, 62, 175-186.
15. Harpur, L. L., Scialfa, C. T., & Thomas, D. M. (1995). Age differences in feature search as a function of exposure duration. Experimental Aging Research, 21, 1-15.
16. Hartley, A. A. (1992). Attention. In F. I. M. Craik & T. A. Salthouse (Eds.), The handbook of aging and cognition (pp. 3-50). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
17. Hasher, L., Zacks, R. T., & May, C. P. (1999). Inhibitory control, circadian arousal, and age. In D. Gopher & A. Koriat (Eds.), Attention and performance XVII: Cognitive regulation of performance: Interaction of theory and application (pp. 653-675). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
18. Humphrey, D. G., & Kramer, A. F. (1997). Age differences in visual search for feature, conjunction, and triple-conjunction targets. Psychology and Aging, 12, 704-717.
19. Juola, J. F., Koshino, H., Warner, C. B., McMickell, M., & Peterson, M. (2000). Automatic and voluntary control of attention in young and older adults. American Journal of Psychology, 113, 159-178.
20. Kane, M. J., Hasher, L., Stoltzfus, E. R., Zacks, R. T., & Connelly, S. L. (1994). Inhibitory attentional mechanisms and aging. Psychology and Aging, 9, 103-112.
21. Kramer, A. F., Humphrey, D. G., Larish, J. F., Logan, G. D., & Strayer, D. L. (1994). Aging and inhibition: Beyond a unitary view of inhibitory processing in attention. Psychology and Aging, 9, 491-512.
22. Langley, L. K., Overmier, J. B., Knopman, D. S., & Prod'Homme, M. M. (1998). Inhibition and habituation: Preserved mechanisms of attentional selection in aging and Alzheimer's disease. Neuropsychology, 12, 353-366.
23. Lavie, N. (1995). Perceptual load as a necessary condition for selective attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 451-468.
24. Lavie, N., & Cox, S. (1997). On the efficiency of visual selective attention: Efficient visual search leads to inefficient distractor rejection. Psychological Science, 8, 395-398.
25. Lavie, N., & Fox, E. (2000). The role of perceptual load in negative priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 1038-1052.
26. Lavie, N., & Tsal, Y. (1994). Perceptual load as a major determinant of the locus of selection in visual attention. Perception & Psychophysics, 56, 183-197.
27. Madden, D. J. (1992). Selective attention and visual search: Revision of an allocation model and application to age differences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 821-836.
28. Madden, D. J. (2001). Speed and timing of behavioral processes. In J. E. Birren & K. W. Schaie (Eds.), Handbook of the psychology of aging (5th ed., pp. 288-312). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
29. Madden, D. J., & Gottlob, L. R. (1997). Adult age differences in strategic and dynamic components of focusing visual attention. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 4, 185-210.
30. Madden, D. J., Pierce, T. W., & Allen, P. A. (1996). Adult age differences in the use of distractor homogeneity during visual search. Psychology and Aging, 11, 454-474.
31. Madden, D. J., & Plude, D. J. (1993). Selective preservation of selective attention. In J. Cerella, J. Rybash, W. Hoyer, & M. L. Commons (Eds.), Adult information processing: Limits on loss (pp. 273-300). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
32. Maylor, E. A., & Lavie, N. (1998). The influence of perceptual load on age differences in selective attention. Psychology and Aging, 13, 563-573.
33. McDowd, J. M., & Shaw, R. J. (2000). Attention and aging: A functional perspective. In F. I. M. Craik & T. A. Salthouse (Eds.), The handbook of aging and cognition (2nd ed., pp. 221-292). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
34. Plude, D. J., & Hoyer, W. J. (1986). Age and the selectivity of visual information processing. Psychology and Aging, 1, 4-10.
35. Posner, M. I., & Snyder, C. R. R. (1975). Facilitation and inhibition in the processing of signals. In P. M. A. Rabbitt & S. Dornic (Eds.), Attention and performance V (pp. 669-682). New York: Academic Press.
36. Pratt, J., & Bellomo, C. N. (1999). Attentional capture in younger and older adults. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 6, 19-31.
37. Proctor, R. W., & Fober, G. W. (1985). Repeated-stimulus superiority and inferiority effects in the identification of letters and digits. Perception & Psychophysics, 38, 125-134.
38. Rees, G., Frith, C. D., & Lavie, N. (1997). Modulating irrelevant motion perception by varying attentional load in an unrelated task. Science, 278, 1616-1619.
39. Salthouse, T. A. (1992). What do adult age differences in the digit symbol substitution test reflect? Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 47, P121-P128.
40. Salthouse, T. A. (1996). The processing-speed theory of adult age differences in cognition. Psychological Review, 103, 403-428.
41. Santee, J. L., & Egeth, H. E. (1982). Do reaction time and accuracy measure the same aspects of letter recognition? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 8, 489-501.
42. Schneider, W. (1988). Micro Experimental Laboratory: An integrated system for IBM PC compatibles. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 20, 206-217.
43. Scialfa, C. T., & Harpur, L. L. (1994). Effects of similarity and duration on age differences in visual search. Canadian Journal on Aging, 13, 51-65.
44. Sullivan, M. P. (1999). The functional interaction of visual-perceptual and response mechanisms during selective attention in young adults, young-old adults, and old-old adults. Perception and Psychophysics, 61, 810-825.
45. Taylor, D. A. (1977). Time course of context effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 106, 404-426.
46. Theeuwes, J., & Burger, R. (1998). Attentional control during visual search: The effect of irrelevant singletons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 1342-1353.
47. Wechsler, D. (1981). Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale - Revised. New York: Psychological Corporation.
48. Wolfe, J. M. (1998). Visual search. In H. Pashler (Ed.), Attention (pp. 13-73). East Sussex, UK: Psychology Press.
49. Wright, L. L., & Elias, J. W. (1979). Age differences in the effects of perceptual noise. Journal of Gerontology, 34, 704-708.
50. Yantis, S., & Jones, E. (1991). Mechanisms of attentional selection: Temporally modulated priority tags. Perception & Psychophysics, 50, 166-178.
51. Zacks, J. L., & Zacks, R. T. (1993). Visual search times assessed without reaction times: A new method and an application to aging. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 4, 798-813.
52. Zeef, E. J., & Kok, A. (1993). Age-related differences in the timing of stimulus and response processes during visual selective attention: Performance and psychophysiological analysis. Psychophysiology, 30, 138-151.
53. Zeef,E. J., Sonke, C. J., Kok, A., Buiten, M. M., & Kenemans, J. L. (1996). Perceptual factors affecting age-related differences in focused attention: Performance and psychophysiological analysis. Psychophysiology, 33, 555-565.