Primary task demands modulate P3a amplitude

Cognitive Brain Research

Volumn 9, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 53-60

  Harmony, Thaliía ^a   Bernal, Jorge ^b   Fernández, Thalía ^b   Silva Pereyra, Juan ^a   Fernández Bouzas, Antonio ^b   Marosi, Erzseébet ^b   Rodríguez, Mario ^b   Reyes, Alfonso ^b  

^a CENTRO DE FÍSICA APLICADA Y TECNOLOGÍA AVANZADA   (Mexico)

^b UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL AUTÓNOMA DE MÉXICO   (Mexico)

Author keywords

Attention; Cross modal task; Dual task; Event related brain potential; N100; P3a

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; AUDITORY STIMULATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; EVOKED AUDITORY RESPONSE; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TASK PERFORMANCE; VERBALIZATION; VISUAL STIMULATION;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADULT; ATTENTION; COGNITION; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVENT-RELATED POTENTIALS, P300; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; REACTION TIME; VERBAL LEARNING;

EID: 0033980315     PISSN: 09266410     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0926-6410(99)00044-0     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. [1] K. Ahlo, D.L. Woods, A. Algazi, R. Näätänen, Intermodal selective attention: II. Effects of attentional load on processing of auditory and visual stimuli in central space, Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 82 (1992) 356-368.
2. [2] K. Ahlo, C. Escera, R. Díaz, E. Yago, J.M. Serra, Effects of involuntary auditory attention on visual task performance and brain activity, NeuroReport 8 (1997) 3233-3237.
3. [3] M.D. Comerchero, J. Polich, P3a, perceptual distinctiveness, and stimulus modality, Brain Res. Cogn. Brain Res. 7 (1998) 41-48.
4. [4] E. Courchesne, R.Y. Courchesne, S.A. Hillyard, The effect of stimulus deviation on P3 waves to easily recognized stimuli, Neuropsychologia 16 (1978) 189-199.
5. [5] E. Donchin, M.G.H. Coles, Is the P300 component a manifestation of context updating?, Behav. Brain Sci. 11 (1988) 357-374.
6. [6] C.C. Duncan, W.H. Kaye, Effects of clonidine on event-related potential measures of information processing, in: R. Johnson, J.W. Rohrbaugh, R. Parasuraman (Eds.), Current Trends in Event-Related Potential Research, Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. Suppl. 40 (1987) 527-531.
7. [7] J.B. Isreal, C.D. Wickens, E. Donchin. The dynamics of P300 during dual-task performance, in: H.H. Kornhuber, L. Deecke (Eds.), Motivation, Motor and Sensory Processes of the Brain: Electrical Potentials, Behaviour and Clinical Use. Progress in Brain Research, Vol. 54, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1980, pp. 416-421.
8. [8] I.P. Jaaskelainen, E. Schroeger, R. Näätänen, Electrophysiological indices of acute effects of ethanol on involuntary attention shifting, Psychopharmacology (Berlin) 141 (1999) 16-21.
9. [9] E.L. Jocoy, J.E. Arruda, K.M. Estes, Y. Yagi, K.L. Coburn, Concurrent visual task effects on evoked and emitted auditory P300 in adolescents, Int. J. Psychophysiol. 30 (1998) 319-328.
10. [10] J. Katayama, J. Polich, Stimulus context determines P3a and P3b, Psychophysiology 35 (1998) 23-33.
11. [11] R.T. Knight, Decreased response to novel stimuli after prefrontal lesions in man, Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 59 (1984) 9-20.
12. [12] R. Näätänen, Attention and Brain Function, Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc., Hillsdale, NJ, 1992.
13. [13] A.C. Papanicolau, J. Johnstone, Probe evoked potentials: theory, method and applications, Int. J. Neurosci. 24 (1984) 107-131.
14. [14] T.W. Picton, The P300 wave of the human event-related potential, J. Clin. Neurophysiol. 9 (1992) 456-479.
15. [15] M.D. Rugg, C.D. Pickles, D.D. Potter, M.C. Doyle, B. Pentland, R.C. Roberts, Cognitive brain potentials in a three-stimulus auditory "oddball" task after closed head injury, Neuropsychologia 31 (1993) 373-393.
16. [16] M. Sams, P. Paavilainen, K. Alho, R. Näätänen, Auditory frequency discrimination and event-related potentials, Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 62 (1985) 437-448.
17. [17] E. Schroeger, C. Woll, Behavioral and electrophysiological effects of task-irrelevant sound change: a new distraction paradigm, Brain Res. Cogn. Brain Res. 7 (1998) 71-87.
18. [18] M. Schubert, S. Johannes, M. Koch, B.M. Wieringa, R. Dengler, T.F. Munte, Differential effects of two motor tasks on ERPs in an auditory classification task: evidence of shared cognitive resources, Neurosci. Res. 30 (1998) 125-134.
19. [19] E. Snyder, S.A. Hillyard, Long-latency evoked potentials to irrelevant deviant stimuli, Behav. Biol. 16 (1976) 319-331.
20. [20] N.K. Squires, K.C. Squires, S.A. Hillyard, Two varieties of longlatency positive waves evoked by unpredictable auditory stimuli in man, Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 38 (1975) 387-401.
21. [21] C.D. Wickens, Processing resources in attention, in: R. Parasurman, D.R. Davies (Eds.), Varieties of Attention, Academic Press, Orlando, FL, 1984, pp. 63-102.
22. [22] D.L. Woods, K. Alho, A. Algazi, Intermodal selective attention: I. Effects on event-related potentials to lateralized auditory and visual stimuli, Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 82 (1992) 341-355.