Top-down control over involuntary attention switching in the auditory modality

Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

Volumn 10, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 630-637

  Sussman, E ^a   Winkler, I ^b,c   Schroger E ^d  

^a ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b INSTITUTE OF EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE   (Hungary)

^c UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

^d UNIVERSITY OF LEIPZIG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0344453368     PISSN: 10699384     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03196525     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. AHVENINEN, J., JÄÄSKELÄINEN, I. P., PEKKONEN, E., HALLBERG, A., HIETANEN, M., NÄÄTÄNEN, R., SCHRÖGER, E., & SILLANAUKEE, P. (2000). Increased distractibility by task-irrelevant sound changes in abstinent alcoholics. Alcoholism: Clinical & Experimental Research, 24, 1850-1854.
2. ALHO, K., ESCERA, C., DIAZ, R., YAGO, E., & SERRA, J. M. (1997). Effects of involuntary auditory attention on visual task performance and brain activity. NeuroReport, 8, 3233-3237.
3. BERTI, S., & SCHRÖGER, E. (2001). A comparison of auditory and visual distraction effects: Behavioral and event-related indices. Cognitive Brain Research, 11, 265-273.
4. COLES, M. G. H., SMID, M., SCHEFFERS, M. K., & OTTEN, L. J. (1995). Mental chronometry and the study of human information processing. In M. D. Rugg & M. G. H. Coles (Eds.), Electrophysiology of mind: Event-related brain potentials and cognition (pp. 86-131). New York: Oxford University Press.
5. COURCHESNE, E., HILLYARD, S. A., & GALAMBOS, R. (1975). Stimulus novelty, task relevance, and the visual evoked potential in man. Electroencephalography & Clinical Neurophysiology, 39, 131-143.
6. CSÉPE, V., KARMOS, G., & MOLNAR, M. (1987). Evoked potential correlates of stimulus deviance during wakefulness and sleep in cat-animal model of mismatch negativity. Electroencephalography in Clinical Neurophysiology, 66, 571-578.
7. DONCHIN, E., & COLES, M. (1988). Is the P300 component a manifestation of context updating? Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 11, 357-374.
8. DRIVER, J., & BAYLIS, G. C. (1991). Target-distractor separation and feature integration in visual attention to letters. Acta Psychologica, 76, 101-119.
9. DUNCAN-JOHNSON, C. C., & DONCHIN, E. (1977). On quantifying surprise: The variation of event-related potentials with subjective probability. Psychophysiology, 14, 456-467.
10. ESCERA, C., ALHO, K., SCHRÖGER, E., & WINKLER, I. (2000). Involuntary attention and distractibility as evaluated with event-related brain potentials. Audiology & Neuro-Otology, 5, 151-166.
11. ESCERA, C., ALHO, K., WINKLER, I., & NÄÄTÄNEN, R. (1998). Neural mechanisms of involuntary attention switching to novelty and change in the acoustic environment. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 10, 590-604.
12. ESCERA, C., YAGO, E., & ALHO, K. (2001). Electrical responses reveal the temporal dynamics of brain events during involuntary attention switching. European Journal of Neuroscience, 14, 877-883.
13. FOLK, C. L., & REMINGTON, R. W. (1996). When knowledge doesn't help: Limitations on the flexibility of attentional control. In A. F. Kramer, M. G. H. Coles, & G. D. Logan (Eds.), Converging operations in the study of visual selective attention (pp. 271-295). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
14. FOLK, C. L., & REMINGTON, R. W. (1998). Selectivity in distraction by irrelevant featural singletons: Evidence for two forms of attentional capture. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 24, 847-858.
15. FOLK, C. L., REMINGTON, R. W., & JOHNSTON, J. C. (1992). Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 18, 1030-1044.
16. FRIEDMAN, D., CYCOWICZ, Y. M., & GAETA, H. (2001). The novelty P3: An event-related brain potential (ERP) sign of the brain's evaluation of novelty. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 25, 355-373.
17. GIARD, M. H., PERRIN, F., PERNIER, J., & BOUCHET, P. (1990). Brain generators implicated in processing of auditory stimulus deviance: A topographic event-related potential study. Psychophysiology, 27, 627-640.
18. GRATTON, G., BOSCO, C. M., KRAMER, A. F., COLES, M. G. H., WICKENS, C. D., & DONCHIN, E. (1990). Event-related brain potentials as indices of information extraction and response priming. Electroencephalography & Clinical Neurophysiology, 75, 419-432.
19. HALGREN, E., BAUDENA, P., CLARKE, J. M., HEIT, G., LIEGEOIS, C., CHAUVEL, P., & MUSOLINO, A. (1995). Electroencephalography & Clinical Neurophysiology, 94, 191-220.
20. JAVITT, D. C., STEINSCHNEIDER, M., SCHROEDER, C. E., & AREZZO, J. C. (1996). Detection of stimulus deviance within primate primary auditory cortex: Intracranial mechanisms of mismatch negativity (MMN) generation. Brain Research, 667, 192-200.
21. JOHNSON, R., JR., & DONCHIN, E. (1978). On how P300 amplitude varies with the utility of the eliciting stimuli. Electroencephalography & Clinical Neurophysiology, 44, 424-437.
22. JONIDES, J., & YANTIS, S. (1988). Uniqueness of abrupt visual onset in capturing attention. Perception & Psychophysics, 43, 346-354.
23. KNIGHT, R. T. (1991). Evoked potential studies of attention capacity in human frontal lobe lesions. In H. S. Levin, H. M. Eisenberg, & A. L. Benton (Eds.), Frontal lobe function and dysfunction (pp. 139-153). New York: Oxford University Press.
24. KNIGHT, R. T., & SCABINI, D. (1998). Anatomic bases of event-related potentials and their relationship to novelty detection in humans. Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology, 15, 3-13.
25. KRAMER, A. F., & JACOBSON, A. (1991). Perceptual organization and focused attention: The role of objects and proximity in visual processing. Perception & Psychophysics, 50, 267-284.
26. KROPOTOV, J. D., NÄÄTÄNEN, R., SEVOSTIANOV, A. V., ALHO, K., REINKAINEN, K., & KROPOTOVA, O. V. (1995). Mismatch negativity to auditory stimulus change recorded directly from the human temporal cortex. Psychophysiology, 32, 418-422.
27. LYYTINEN, H., BLOMBERG, A. P., & NÄÄTÄNEN, R. (1992). Event-related potentials and autonomic responses to a change in unattended auditory stimuli. Psychophysiology, 29, 523-534.
28. MÜLLER, H. J., & RABBITT, P. M. A. (1989). Reflexive and voluntary orienting of visual attention: Time course of activation and resistance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 15, 315-330.
29. NÄÄTÄNEN, R. (1992). Attention and brain function. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
30. NÄÄTÄNEN, R., & WINKLER, I. (1999). The concept of auditory stimulus representation in cognitive neuroscience. Psychological Bulletin, 6, 826-859.
31. NAGAHAMA, Y., OKADA, T., KATSUMI, Y., HAYASHI, T., YAMAUCHI, H., OYANAGI, C., KONISHI, J., FUKUYAMA, H., & SHIBASAKI, H. (2001). Dissociable mechanisms of attentional control within human prefrontal cortex. Cerebral Cortex, 11, 85-92.
32. OPITZ, B., RINNE, T., MECKLINGER, A., VON CRAMON, D. Y., & SCHRÖGER, E. (2002). Differential contribution of frontal and temporal cortices to auditory change detection: fMRI and ERP results. Neuro-Image, 15, 165-174.
33. PICTON, T. W., ALAIN, C., OTTEN, L., RITTER, W., & ACHIM, A. (2000). Mismatch negativity: Different water in the same river. Audiology & Neuro-Otology, 5, 111-139.
34. REMINGTON, R. W., FOLK, C. L., & McLEAN, J. P. (2001). Contingent attentional capture or delayed allocation of attention? Perception & Psychophysics, 63, 298-307.
35. REMINGTON, R. W., JOHNSTON, J. C., & YANTIS, S. (1992). Involuntary attentional capture by abrupt onsets. Perception & Psychophysics, 51, 279-290.
36. RINNE, T., ALHO, K., ILMONIEMI, R. J., VIRTANEN, J., & NÄÄTÄNEN, R. (2000). Separate time behaviors of the temporal and frontal MMN sources. NeuroImage, 12, 14-19.
37. RINNE, T., ANTILA, S., & WINKLER, I. (2001). MMN is unaffected by top-down predictive information. NeuroReport, 12, 2209-2213.
38. RITTER, W., SUSSMAN, E., DEACON, D., COWAN, N., & VAUGHAN, H. G., JR. (1999). Two cognitive systems simultaneously prepared for opposite events. Psychophysiology, 36, 835-838.
39. SAMS, M., & HARI, R. (1991). Magnetoencephalography in the study of human auditory information processing. In R. A. Zapulla et al. (Eds.), Windows on the brain: Neuropsychology's technical frontiers (Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, Vol. 620, pp. 102-117). New York: New York Academy of Sciences.
40. SCHERG, M., VAJSAR, J., & PICTON, T. W. (1989). A source analysis of the late human auditory evoked potentials. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 1, 336-355.
41. SCHRÖGER, E. (1997). On the detection of auditory deviations: A preattentive activation model. Psychophysiology, 34, 245-257.
42. SCHRÖGER, E., GIARD, M.-H., & WOLFF, C. (2000). Auditory distraction: Event-related potential and behavioral indices. Clinical Neurophysiology, 111, 1450-1460.
43. SCHRÖGER, E., & WOLFF, C. (1998a). Attentional orienting and reorienting is indicated by human event-related brain potentials. Neuro-Report, 9, 3355-3358.
44. SCHRÖGER, E., & WOLFF, C. (1998b). Behavioral and electrophysiological effects of task-irrelevant sound change: A new distraction paradigm. Cognitive Brain Research, 1, 71-87.
45. SPENCER, K. M., DIEN, J., & DONCHIN, E. (1999). A componential analysis of the ERP elicited by novel events using a dense electrode array. Psychophysiology, 36, 409-414.
46. SQUIRES, K. C., DONCHIN, E., HERNING, R. I., & McCARTHY, G. (1977). On the influence of task relevance and stimulus probability on event-related potential components. Electroencephalography & Clinical Neurophysiology, 42, 1-14.
47. SQUIRES, N. K., SQUIRES, K. C., & HILLYARD, S. A. (1975). Two varieties of long-latency positive waves evoked by unpredictable auditory stimuli in man. Electroencephalography & Clinical Neurophysiology, 38, 387-410.
48. SUTTON, S., BRAREN, M., ZUBIN, J., & JOHN, E. R. (1965). Evoked potential correlates of stimulus uncertainty. Science, 150, 1187-1188.
49. THEEUWES, J. (1991). Cross-dimensional perceptual selectivity. Perception & Psychophysics, 50, 184-193.
50. THEEUWES, J. (1992). Perceptual selectivity for color and form. Perception & Psychophysics, 51, 599-606.
51. THEEUWES, J. (1994). Stimulus-driven capture and attentional set: Selective search for color and visual abrupt onsets. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 20, 799-806.
52. THEEUWES, J., & BERGER, R. (1998). Attentional control during visual search: The effect of irrelevant singletons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 24, 1342-1353.
53. TREISMAN, A. M., & GELADE, G. (1980). A feature integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 97-136.
54. WOODS, D. L. (1990). The physiological basis of selective attention: Implications of event-related potential studies. In J. W. Rohrbaugh, R. Parasuranam, & R. Johnson, Jr. (Eds.), Event-related potentials: Basic issues and applications (pp. 178-209). New York: Oxford University Press.
55. YANTIS, S. (1993). Stimulus-driven attentional capture and attentional control settings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 19, 676-681.
56. YANTIS, S., & EGETH, H. E. (1999). On the distinction between salience and stimulus-driven attentional capture. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 25, 661-676.
57. YANTIS, S., & JONIDES, J. (1984). Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: Evidence from visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 10, 601-621.
58. YANTIS, S., & JONIDES, J. (1990). Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: Voluntary versus automatic allocation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 16, 121-134.