Regularity extraction and application in dynamic auditory stimulus sequences

Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience

Volumn 19, Issue 10, 2007, Pages 1664-1677

  Bendixen, Alexandra ^a   Roeber, Urte ^a   Schröger, Erich ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEIPZIG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; BEHAVIOR CHANGE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; EVOLUTIONARY ADAPTATION; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MISMATCH NEGATIVITY; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; STIMULUS RESPONSE;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADULT; ATTENTION; CEREBRAL CORTEX; DISCRIMINATION (PSYCHOLOGY); EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY; FEMALE; FIELD DEPENDENCE-INDEPENDENCE; HUMANS; MALE; PATTERN RECOGNITION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; PERCEPTUAL MASKING; PROBABILITY LEARNING; REACTION TIME; REFERENCE VALUES; SERIAL LEARNING; TIME PERCEPTION;

EID: 35148829891     PISSN: 0898929X     EISSN: 15308898     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1162/jocn.2007.19.10.1664     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Baldeweg, T. (2006). Repetition effects to sounds: Evidence for predictive coding in the auditory system. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 93-94.
2. Baldeweg, T., Klugman, A., Gruzelier, J., & Hirsch, S. R. (2004). Mismatch negativity potentials and cognitive impairment in schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Research, 69, 203-217.
3. Berti, S., Roeber, U., & Schröger, E. (2004). Bottom-up influences on working memory: Behavioral and electrophysiological distraction varies with distractor strength. Experimental Psychology, 51, 249-257.
4. Berti, S., & Schröger, E. (2001). A comparison of auditory and visual distraction effects: Behavioral and event-related indices. Cognitive Brain Research, 10, 265-273.
5. Berti, S., & Schröger, E. (2003). Working memory controls involuntary attention switching: Evidence from an auditory distraction paradigm. European Journal of Neuroscience, 17, 1119-1122.
6. Cowan, N., Winkler, I., Teder, W., & Näätänen, R. (1993). Memory prerequisites of the mismatch negativity in the auditory event-related potential (ERP). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 909-921.
7. Cross, E. M., & Chaffin, W. W. (1982). Use of the binomial theorem in interpreting results of multiple tests of significance. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 42, 25-34.
8. Delorme, A., & Makeig, S. (2004). EEGLAB: An open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 134, 9-21.
9. Escera, C., Alho, K., Schröger, E., & Winkler, I. (2000). Involuntary attention and distractibility as evaluated with event-related brain potentials. Audiology & Neuro-Otology, 5, 151-166.
10. Escera, C., Yago, E., & Alho, K. (2001). Electrical responses reveal the temporal dynamics of brain events during involuntary attention switching. European Journal of Neuroscience, 14, 877-883.
11. Friedman, D., Cycowicz, Y. M., & Gaeta, H. (2001). The novelty P3: An event-related brain potential (ERP) sign of the brain's evaluation of novelty. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 25, 355-373.
12. Haenschel, C., Vernon, D. J., Dwivedi, P., Gruzelier, J. H., & Baldeweg, T. (2005). Event-related brain potential correlates of human auditory sensory memory-trace formation. Journal of Neuroscience, 25, 10494-10501.
13. Horváth, J., Czigler, I., Sussman, E., & Winkler, I. (2001). Simultaneously active pre-attentive representations of local and global rules for sound sequences in the human brain. Cognitive Brain Research, 12, 131-144.
14. Horváth, J., & Winkler, I. (2004). How the human auditory system treats repetition amongst change. Neuroscience Letters, 368, 157-161.
15. Huotilainen, M., Kujala, A., & Alku, P. (2001). Long-term memory traces facilitate short-term memory trace formation in audition in humans. Neuroscience Letters, 310, 133-136.
16. Imada, T., Hari, R., Loveless, N., McEvoy, L., & Sams, M. (1993). Determinants of the auditory mismatch response. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 87, 144-153.
17. Jacobsen, T., & Schröger, E. (2001). Is there pre-attentive memory-based comparison of pitch? Psychophysiology, 38, 723-727.
18. Javitt, D. C., Grochowski, S., Shelley, A.-M., & Ritter, W. (1998). Impaired mismatch negativity (MMN) generation in schizophrenia as a function of stimulus deviance, probability, and interstimulus/interdeviant interval. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 108, 143-153.
19. Junghöfer, M., Elbert, T., Leiderer, P., Berg, P., & Rockstroh, B. (1997). Mapping EEG-potentials on the surface of the brain: A strategy for uncovering cortical sources. Brain Topography, 9, 203-217.
20. Knight, R. T., & Scabini, D. (1998). Anatomic bases of event-related potentials and their relationship to novelty detection in humans. Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology, 15, 3-13.
21. Linden, D. E. J. (2005). The P300: Where in the brain is it produced and what does it tell us? Neuroscientist, 11, 563-576.
22. Mager, R., Falkenstein, M., Störmer, R., Brand, S., Müller-Spahn, F., & Bullinger, A. H. (2005). Auditory distraction in young and middle-aged adults: A behavioural and event-related potential study. Journal of Neural Transmission, 112, 1165-1176.
23. McCarthy, G., & Wood, C. C. (1985). Scalp distributions of event-related potentials: An ambiguity associated with analysis of variance models. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 62, 203-208.
24. Müller, D., Widmann, A., & Schröger, E. (2005). Deviance-repetition effects as a function of stimulus feature, feature value variation, and timing: A mismatch negativity study. Biological Psychology, 68, 1-14.
25. Munka, L., & Berti, S. (2006). Examining task-dependencies of different attentional processes as reflected in the P3a and reorienting negativity components of the human event-related brain potential. Neuroscience Letters, 396, 177-181.
26. Näätänen, R. (1992). Attention and brain function. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
27. Näätänen, R., & Alho, K. (1997). Higher-order processes in auditory-change detection. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 1, 44-45.
28. Näätänen, R., Gaillard, A. W. K., & Mäntysalo, S. (1978). Early selective-attention effect on evoked potential reinterpreted. Acta Psychologica, 42, 313-329.
29. Näätänen, R., Jacobsen, T., & Winkler, I. (2005). Memory-based or afferent processes in mismatch negativity (MMN): A review of the evidence. Psychophysiology, 42, 25-32.
30. Näätänen, R., Tervaniemi, M., Sussman, E., Paavilainen, P., & Winkler, I. (2001). "Primitive intelligence" in the auditory cortex. Trends in Neurosciences, 24, 283-288.
31. Näätänen, R., & Winkler, I. (1999). The concept of auditory stimulus representation in cognitive neuroscience. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 826-859.
32. Oostenveld, R., & Praamstra, P. (2001). The five percent electrode system for high-resolution EEG and ERP measurements. Clinical Neurophysiology, 112, 713-719.
33. Opitz, B., Schröger, E., & von Cramon, D. Y. (2005). Sensory and cognitive mechanisms for preattentive change detection in auditory cortex. European Journal of Neuroscience, 21, 531-535.
34. Perrin, F., Pernier, J., Bertrand, O., & Echallier, J. F. (1989). Spherical splines for scalp potential and current density mapping. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 72, 184-187.
35. Perrin, F., Pernier, J., Bertrand, O., & Echallier, J. F. (1990). Corrigendum. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 76, 565.
36. Picton, T. W., Alain, C., Otten, L., Ritter, W., & Achim, A. (2000). Mismatch negativity: Different water in the same river. Audiology & Neuro-Otology, 5, 111-139.
37. Picton, T. W., Bentin, S., Berg, P., Donchin, E., Hillyard, S. A., Johnson, R., Jr., et al. (2000). Guidelines for using human event-related potentials to study cognition: Recording standards and publication criteria. Psychophysiology, 37, 127-152.
38. Roeber, U., Berti, S., Widmann, A., & Schröger, E. (2005). Response repetition vs. response change modulates behavioral and electrophysiological effects of distraction. Cognitive Brain Research, 22, 451-456.
39. Sams, M., Alho, K., & Näätänen, R. (1983). Sequential effects on the ERP in discriminating two stimuli. Biological Psychology, 17, 41-58.
40. Sams, M., Alho, K., & Näätänen, R. (1984). Short-term habituation and dishabituation of the mismatch negativity of the ERP. Psychophysiology, 21, 434-441.
41. Schröger, E. (2005). The mismatch negativity as a tool to study auditory processing. Acta Acustica united with Acustica, 91, 490-501.
42. Schröger, E., Giard, M.-H., & Wolff, C. (2000). Auditory distraction: Event-related potential and behavioral indices. Clinical Neurophysiology, 111, 1450-1460.
43. Schröger, E., & Wolff, C. (1998a). Attentional orienting and reorienting is indicated by human event-related brain potentials. NeuroReport, 9, 3355-3358.
44. Schröger, E., & Wolff, C. (1998b). Behavioral and electrophysiological effects of task-irrelevant sound change: A new distraction paradigm. Cognitive Brain Research, 7, 71-87.
45. Squires, K. C., Wickens, C., Squires, N. K., & Donchin, E. (1976). The effect of stimulus sequence on the waveform of the cortical event-related potential. Science, 193, 1142-1146.
46. Sussman, E., Winkler, I., & Schröger, E. (2003). Top-down control over involuntary attention switching in the auditory modality. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10, 630-637.
47. Winkler, I., Cowan, N., Csépe, V., Czigler, I., & Näätänen, R. (1996). Interactions between transient and long-term auditory memory as reflected by the mismatch negativity. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 8, 403-415.
48. Yago, E., Corral, M. J., & Escera, C. (2001). Activation of brain mechanisms of attention switching as a function of auditory frequency change. NeuroReport, 12, 4093-4097.