The CONSORT statement: Revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials

Lancet

Volumn 357, Issue 9263, 2001, Pages 1191-1194

  Moher, David ^a   Schulz, Kenneth F ^b   Altman, Douglas G ^c   Lepage, Leah ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^d CHILDREN S HOSPITAL OF EASTERN ONTARIO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DATA ANALYSIS; DOCUMENT EXAMINATION; FOLLOW UP; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZATION; RELIABILITY; REVIEW; SAMPLE; SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE; TECHNIQUE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VALIDATION PROCESS;

EID: 0035857966     PISSN: 01406736     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)04337-3     Document Type: Review

References (30)

1. Empirical evidence of bias: Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials
2. Does the quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses?
3. Content and quality of 2000 controlled trials in schizophrenia over 50 years
4. Putting trials on trial - The costs and consequences of small trials in depression: A systematic review of methodology
5. Size and quality of randomised controlled trials in head injury: Review of published studies
6. Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials: The CONSORT statement
7. CONSORT: An important step toward evidence-based health care
8. Better reporting of randomized controlled trials: The CONSORT statement
9. The quest for unbiased research: Randomized clinical trials and the CONSORT reporting guidelines
10. CMAJ endorses the CONSORT statement
11. News from the international committee of medical journal editors
12. Use of CONSORT statement and quality of reports of randomized trials: A comparative before and after evaluation?
13. The value of patient flow charts in reports of randomized controlled trials: Bibliographic study
14. Beyond CONSORT: Need for improved reporting standards for clinical trials
15. Current controlled trials: An opportunity to help improve the quality of clinical research
16. Guidelines for statistical reporting in articles for medical journals: Amplifications and explanations
17. The revised CONSORT statement for reporting randomized trials: Explanation and elaboration
18. Extending the CONSORT statement to cluster randomised trials: For discussion
19. What is meant by intention-to-treat analysis? Survey of published randomized controlled trials
20. Intention-to-treat analysis is related to methodological quality
21. Analysis of clinical trials by treatment actually received: Is it really an option?
22. Towards evidence based radiation oncology: Improving the design, analysis, and reporting of clinical outcome studies in radiotherapy
23. MRC uses checklist similar to CONSORT's
24. Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: The QUOROM statement
25. Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: A proposal for reporting
26. Recommendations for reporting cost-effectiveness analysis
27. The quality of reporting in published cost-utility analyses, 1976-1997
28. The scandal of poor medical research