The effects of two cavity preparation methods on the longevity of glass ionomer cement restorations: An evaluation after 12 months

Journal of the American Dental Association

Volumn 133, Issue 6, 2002, Pages 744-751

  Yip, Kevin H K ^a   Smales, Roger J ^b,c   Gao, Wei ^d   Peng, Dong ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ADELAIDE   (Australia)

^c Beijing Medical University ^*  (Australia)

^d PEKING UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FUJI IX; GLASS IONOMER; KETAC MOLAR APLICAP; KETAC-MOLAR APLICAP;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTAL SURGERY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MOLAR TOOTH; NONPARAMETRIC TEST;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; DENTAL CAVITY PREPARATION; DENTAL RESTORATION WEAR; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; FEMALE; GLASS IONOMER CEMENTS; HUMANS; MALE; MOLAR; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC;

EID: 0036616288     PISSN: 00028177     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.14219/jada.archive.2002.0272     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Frencken J, Makoni F. A treatment technique for tooth decay in deprived communities. World Health 1994;478:15-7.
2. Phantumvanit P, Songpaisan Y, Pilot T, Frencken JE. Atraumatic restorative treatment (ART): a three-year community field trial in Thailand - survival of one-surface restorations in the permanent dentition. J Public Health Dent 1996;56(special issue):141-5.
3. Frencken J, Makoni F, Sithole WD, Hackenitz I. Three-year survival of one-surface ART restorations and glass-ionomer sealants in a school oral health programme in Zimbabwe. Caries Res 1998;32:119-26.
4. Mallow PK, Durward CS, Klaipo M. Restoration of permanent teeth in young rural children in Cambodia using the atraumatic restorative technique (ART) and Fuji II glass ionomer cement. Int J Paediatr Dent 1998;8:35-40.
5. Holmgren CJ, Lo EC, Hu DY, Wan HC. ART restorations and sealants placed in Chinese school children: results after three years. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2000;28:314-20.
6. Phantumvanit P, Songpaisan Y, Frencken JE, Pilot T. Survival of ART-sealant in 3-year community field trial (abstract 2721). J Dent Res 1998;77:972.
7. Frencken J, Songpaisan Y, Phantumvanit P, Pilot T. An atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) technique: evaluation after one year. Int Dent J 1994;44:460-4.
8. Frencken JE, Makoni F, Sithole WD. Atraumatic restorative treatment and glass-ionomer sealants in a school oral health programme in Zimbabwe: evaluation after 1 year. Caries Res 1996;30:428-33.
9. Ho TF, Smales RJ, Fang DT. A 2-year clinical study of two glass ionomer cements used in the atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) technique. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1999;27:195-201.
10. Gryst MEI, Mount GJ. The use of glass ionomer in special needs patients. Oral Health 2000;90(9):43-5.
11. Mandari GJ, Truin GJ, van't Hof MA, Frencken JE. Effectiveness of three minimal intervention approaches for managing dental caries: survival of restorations after 2 years. Caries Res 2001;35:90-4.
12. Yip HK, Smales RJ, Yu C, Gao XJ, Deng DM. Comparison of atraumatic restorative treatment and conventional cavity preparations for glass-ionomer restorations in primary molars: one-year results. Quintessence Int 2002;33:17-21.
13. Fang DT. In vivo and in vitro aspects of glass ionomer cements used for the atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) technique (MDS research dissertation). Hong Kong: The University of Hong Kong; 1998.
14. Frencken J, Phantumvanit P, Pilot T. Manual of atraumatic restorative treatment technique of dental caries. 2nd ed. WHO Collaborating Centre for Oral Health Services Research. Geneva, Switzerland: Groningen; 1994.
15. Smales RJ, Creaven PJ. Evaluation of three clinical methods for assessing amalgam and resin restorations. J Prosthet Dent 1985;54: 340-6.
16. Ryge G, Snyder M. Evaluating the clinical quality of restorations. JADA 1973;87:369-77.
17. Wassell RW, Walls AW, McCabe JF. Direct composite inlays versus conventional composite restorations: three year clinical results. Br Dent J 1995;179:343-9.
18. van Amerongen WE, Rahimtoola S. Is ART really atraumatic? Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1999;27:431-5.
19. Frencken JE, Holmgren CJ. Atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) for dental caries. Nijmegen, Netherlands: STI Book b.v.; 1999:86-93.
20. Smith AJ, Chimimba PD, Kalf-Scholte S, Bouma J. Clinical pilot study on new dental filling materials and preparation procedures in developing countries. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1990;18:309-12.
21. Mickenautsch S, Rudolph MJ, Ogunbodede EO, Frencken JE. The impact of the ART approach on the treatment profile in a mobile dental system (MDS) in South Africa. Int Dent J 1999;49:132-8.
22. Smales RJ, Gao W, Ho FT. In vitro evaluation of sealing pits and fissures with newer glass-ionomer cements developed for the ART technique. J Clin Pediatr Dent 1997;21:321-3.
23. Seppa L, Forss H. Resistance of occlusal fissures to demineralization after loss of glass ionomer sealants in vitro. Pediatr Dent 1991;13:39-42.
24. Anusavice KJ. Does ART have a place in preservative dentistry? Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1999;27:442-8.
25. Weerheijm KL, Groen HJ. The residual caries dilemma. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1999;27:436-41.
26. American Dental Association Council on Scientific Affairs. Acceptance program guidelines for composite resins for posterior restorations. Chicago: American Dental Association; 1989.