Clinical Evaluation of Efficacy and Safety of a New Method for Chemo-Mechanical Removal of Caries: A Multi-Centre Study

Caries Research

Volumn 33, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 171-177

  Ericson, Dan ^a   Zimmerman, M ^c   Raber, H ^d   Gotrick B ^b   Bornstein, R ^c   Thorell, J ^e  

^a LUND UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b LUND UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

^c KAROLINSKA INSTITUTE   (Sweden)

^d Eastman Dental Institute Stockholm   (Sweden)

^e Biolin Medical   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Carisolv; Chemo mechanical removal; Clinical trial; Dental caries; Efficacy; Multi centre study

Indexed keywords

CARISOLV; GLUTAMIC ACID; LEUCINE; LYSINE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; CHILD; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL EQUIPMENT; DENTAL SURGERY; FEMALE; GEL; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; MULTICENTER STUDY; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PRESCHOOL CHILD; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; QUESTIONNAIRE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; VISCOSITY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL CAVITY PREPARATION; DENTAL INSTRUMENTS; FEMALE; GELS; GLUTAMIC ACID; HUMANS; LEUCINE; LYSINE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; QUESTIONNAIRES; VISCOSITY;

EID: 0033129114     PISSN: 00086568     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1159/000016513     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Anusavice KJ, Kincheloe JE: Comparison of pain associated with mechanical and chemo-mechanical removal of caries. J Dent Res 1987; 66:1680-1683.
2. Berggren U, Meynert G: Dental fear and avoidance: Causes, symptoms and consequences. J Am Dent Assoc 1984;108:247-251.
3. Ericson D: In vitro efficacy of a new gel for chemo-mechanical caries removal (abstract 360). J Dent Res 1998;77:1252.
4. Frenken JE, Pilot T, Songpaisan Y, Phantumvanit P: Atraumatic restorative treatment (ART): Rationale, technique, and development. J Public Health Dent 1996;56:135-140.
5. Green RM, Green A: Adult attitudes to dentistry among dental attenders in South Wales. Br Dent J 1985;159:157-160.
6. Habib CM, Kronman J, Goldman M: A chemical evaluation of collagen and hydroxyproline after treatment with GK-101 (N-chloroglycine). Pharmacol Ther Dent 1975;2:209-215.
7. Hand RE, Smith ML, Harrison JW: Analysis of the effect of dilution on the necrotic tissue dissolution property of sodium hypochlorite. J Endod 1978;4:60-64.
8. Horowitz AM: Introduction to the symposium on minimal intervention techniques for caries. J Public Health Dent 1996;56:133-134.
9. Keller U, Hibst R: Effects of Er:YAG laser in caries treatment: A clinical pilot study. Lasers Surg Med 1997;20:32-38.
10. Kidd EA, Joyston-Bechal S, Beighton D: The use of a caries detector dye during cavity preparation: A microbiological assessment. Br Dent J 1993;10:174:245-248.
11. Kronman JH, Goldman M, Habib CM, Mengel L: Electron microscopic evaluation of altered collagen structure induced by N-chloroglycine (GK-101). J Dent Res 1977;56:1539-1545.
12. Leksell E, Ridell K, Cvek M, Méjare I: Pulp exposure after stepwise versus direct complete excavation of deep carious lesions in young posterior permanent teeth. Endod Dent Traumatol 1996;12:192-196.
13. McCune RJ: Report on a symposium on chemomechanical caries removal: A multicentre study. Compend Cont Educ Dent 1986;7:151-159.
14. Matsumoto K, Nakamura Y, Mazeki K, Kimura Y: Clinical dental application of Er:YAG laser for class V cavity preparation. J Clin Laser Med Surg 1996;4:123-127.
15. Moritz A, Gutknecht N, Schoop U, Goharkhay K, Wernisch J, Sperr W: Alternatives in enamel conditioning: A comparison of conventional and innovative methods. J Clin Laser Med Surg 1996;14:133-136.
16. Schutzbank SG, Galaini J, Kronman JH, Goldman M, Clarke REA: A comparative in vitro study of the effect of GK-101 and GK101E in caries removal. J Dent Res 1978;57:861-864.
17. Shovelton S: The maintenance of pulp vitality. Br Dent J 1972;133:95-101.
18. Stanley HR, Swedlow H: Biological effects of various cutting methods in cavity preparation: The part pressure plays in pulpal response. J Am Dent Assoc 1960;61:450-456.
19. Strid L, Hedward C: Patent SE 8704832. 1989.
20. Tavares M, Soparkar PM, De Paola PF: Evaluation of a chemomechanical method of caries removal in root surface lesions. Quintessence Int 1988;19:29-32.
21. Yip HK, Beeley JA, Stevenson AG: Mineral content of the dentine remaining after chemomechanical caries removal. Caries Res 1995a, 29:111-117.
22. Yip HK, Stevenson AG, Beeley JA: The specificity of caries detector dyes in cavity preparation. Br Dent J 1994;176:417-421.
23. Yip HK, Stevenson AG, Beeley JA: An improved reagent for chemomechanical caries removal in permanent and deciduous teeth: An in vitro study. J Dent 1995b;23:197-204.
24. Zink JH, McInnes-Ledoux, Capdeboscq C, Weinberg R: Chemomechanical caries removal: A clinical evaluation. J Oral Rehabil 1988;15: 23-33.