Comparison of atraumatic restorative treatment and conventional restorative procedures in a hospital clinic: Evaluation after 30 months

Quintessence International

Volumn 34, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 31-37

  Gao, Wei ^a   Peng, Dong ^a   Smales, Roger J ^b   Yip, Kevin H K ^c,d  

^a PEKING UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER   (China)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ADELAIDE   (Australia)

^c UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^d UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

Amalgam; Atraumatic restorative treatment; Fissure sealant; Glass ionomer cement

Indexed keywords

AMALGAM; FISSURE SEALANT; GLASS IONOMER; TOOTH CEMENT; DENTAL ALLOY; FUJI IX GP FAST; KETAC MOLAR; KETAC-MOLAR;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTAL CARE; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL CLINIC; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MALE; MOLAR TOOTH; TECHNIQUE; TOOTH COLOR; TREATMENT OUTCOME; CHEMISTRY; CHI SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; CLINICAL TRIAL; COLOR; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CORROSION; DENTAL SURGERY; ENDODONTICS; FOLLOW UP; INSTRUMENTATION; METHODOLOGY; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; SURFACE PROPERTY; TIME;

ADULT; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; COLOR; CORROSION; DENTAL AMALGAM; DENTAL CAVITY PREPARATION; DENTAL RESTORATION FAILURE; DENTAL RESTORATION WEAR; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; DENTAL SERVICE, HOSPITAL; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; GLASS IONOMER CEMENTS; HUMANS; MALE; MARGINAL ADAPTATION (DENTISTRY); MOLAR; PIT AND FISSURE SEALANTS; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 0037945462     PISSN: 00336572     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Frencken J, Makoni F. A treatment technique for tooth decay in deprived communities. World Health 1994;47: 15-17.
2. Phantumvanit P, Songpaisan Y, Pilot T, Frencken JE. Atraumatic restorative treatment (ART): A three-year community field trial in Thailand-Survival of one-surface restorations in the permanent dentition. J Public Health Dent 1996;56(special issue):141-145.
3. Frencken J, Makoni F, Sithole WD, Hackenitz I. Three-year survival of one-surface ART restorations and glass-ionomer sealants in a school oral health programme in Zimbabwe. Caries Res 1998;32:119-126.
4. Mallow PK, Durward CS, Klaipo M. Restoration of permanent teeth in young rural children in Cambodia using the atraumatic restorative (ART) technique and Fuji II glass ionomer cement. Int J Paediatr Dent 1998;8:35-40.
5. Holmgren CJ, Lo ECM, Hu DY, Wan HC. ART restorations and sealants placed in Chinese school children-Results after three years. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2000;28: 314-320.
6. Phantumvanit P, Songpaisan Y, Frencken JE, Pilot T. Survival of ART sealant in 3-year community field trial [abstract 2721]. J Dent Res 1998;77:972.
7. Frencken J, Songpaisan Y, Phantumvanit P, Pilot T. An atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) technique: Evaluation after one year. Int Dent J 1994;44:460-464.
8. Frencken JE, Makoni F, Sithole WD. Atraumatic restorative treatment and glass-ionomer sealants in a school oral health programme in Zimbabwe: Evaluation after 1 year. Caries Res 1996;30:428-433.
9. Ho TFT, Smales RJ, Fang TSD. A 2-year clinical study of two glass ionomer cements used in the atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) technique. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1999;27:195-201.
10. Gryst MEI, Mount GJ. The use of glass ionomer in special needs patients. Oral Health 2000;90:43-45.
11. Mandari GJ, Truin GJ, van't Hof MA, Frencken JE. Effectiveness of three minimal intervention approaches for managing dental caries: Survival of restorations after 2 years. Caries Res 2001;35:90-94.
12. Yip HK, Smales RJ, Yu C, Gao XJ, Deng DM. Comparison of atraumatic restorative treatment and conventional cavity preparations for glass-ionomer restorations in primary molars: One-year results. Quintessence Int 2002;33:17-21.
13. Fang DTS. In vivo and in vitro aspects of glass ionomer cements used for the atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) technique [thesis]. University of Hong Kong, 1998.
14. Frencken J, Phantumvanit P, Pilot T. Manual Atraumatic Restorative Treatment Technique of Dental Caries, ed 2. Groningen, The Netherlands: WHO Collaborating Centre for Oral Health Services Research, 1994.
15. Smales RJ, Creaven PJ. Evaluation of three clinical methods for assessing amalgam and resin restorations. J Prosthet Dent 1985;54:340-346.
16. Ryge G, Snyder M. Evaluating the clinical quality of restorations. J Am Dent Assoc 1973;87:369-377.
17. Wassell RW, Walls AWG, McCabe JF. Direct composite inlays versus conventional composite restorations: Three-year clinical results. Br Dent J 1995;179:343-349.
18. van Amerongen WE, Rahimtoola S. Is ART really atraumatic? Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1999;27:431-435.
19. Frencken JE, Holmgren CJ. Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (ART) for Dental Caries, ed 1. Nijmegen, The Netherlands: STI Book, 1999:86-93.
20. Smith AJE, Chimimba PD, Kalf-Scholte S, Bouma J. Clinical pilot study on new dental filling materials and preparation procedures in developing countries. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1990;18:309-312.
21. Frencken JE, Makoni F, Sithole WD. ART restorations and glass ionomer sealants in Zimbabwe: Survival after 3 years. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1998;26:372-381.
22. Smales RJ, Gao W, Ho FT. In vitro evaluation of sealing pits and fissures with newer glass-ionomer cements developed for the ART technique. J Clin Pediatr Dent 1997;21: 321-323.
23. Seppa L, Forss H. Resistance of occlusal fissures to demineralization after loss of glass ionomer sealants in vitro. Pediatr Dent 1991;13:39-42.
24. Anusavice KJ. Does ART have a place in preservative dentistry? Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1999;27:442-448.
25. Weerheijm KL, Groen HJ. The residual caries dilemma. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1999;27:436-441.
26. American Dental Association Council on Scientific Affairs. American Dental Association acceptance program guidelines for composite resins for posterior restorations. Chicago: American Dental Association, November 1989.