Survival of ART and amalgam restorations in permanent teeth of children after 6.3 years

Journal of Dental Research

Volumn 85, Issue 7, 2006, Pages 622-626

  Frencken, J E ^a   Taifour, D ^b   Van't Hof, M A ^a  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b Ministry of Higher Education   (Syrian Arab Republic)

Author keywords

Amalgam; Atraumatic restorative; Glass ionomer; Restorations; Survival; Treatment

Indexed keywords

EID: 33746116551     PISSN: 00220345     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/154405910608500708     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Burke FJ, Cheung SW, Mjör IA, Wilson NH (1999). Restoration longevity and analysis of reasons for the placement and replacement of restorations provided by vocational dental practitioners and their trainers in the United Kingdom. Quintessence Int 30:234-342.
2. Efron B (1982). The jackknife, the bootstrap and other resampling plans. Philadelphia: SIAM-NSF.
3. Frencken JE, Holmgren CJ (2004). ART: a minimal intervention approach to manage dental caries. Dent Update 31:295-298, 301.
4. Frencken JE, Pilot T, Songpaisan Y, Phantumvanit P (1996). Atraumatic restorative treatment (ART): rationale, technique, and development. J Public Health Dent 56(Spec Iss 3):135-140.
5. Greenwood M (1926). The "errors of sampling" of the survivorship tables. Appendix 1. In: Reports on public health and medical subjects. No. 33. London, UK: Her Majesty's Stationery Office.
6. Holmgren CJ, Lo EC, Hu D, Wan H (2000). ART restorations and sealants placed in Chinese school children-results after three years. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 28:314-320.
7. Landis JR, Koch GG (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159-174.
8. Lo EC, Luo Y, Fan MW, Wei SH (2001). Clinical investigation of two glass-ionomer restoratives used with the atraumatic restorative treatment approach in China: two-year results. Caries Res 35:458-463.
9. Mandari GJ, Frencken JE, van 't Hof MA (2003). Six-year success rates of occlusal amalgam and glass-ionomer restorations placed using three minimal intervention approaches. Caries Res 37:246-253.
10. Mjör IA, Burke FJ, Wilson NH (1997). The relative cost of different restorations in the UK. Br Dent J 182:286-289.
11. Phantumvanit P, Songpaisan Y, Pilot T, Frencken JE (1996). Atraumatic restorative treatment (ART): a three-year community field trial in Thailand-survival of one-surface restorations in the permanent dentition. J Public Health Dent 56(Spec Iss 3):141-145.
12. Taifour D (2002). Effectiveness of the ART approach in a child population in Syria (dissertation). Nijmegen, the Netherlands: Radboud University.
13. Taifour D, Frencken JE, Beiruti N, van 't Hof MA, Truin GJ (2002). Effectiveness of glass-ionomer (ART) and amalgam restorations in the deciduous dentition-results after 3 years. Caries Res 36:437-444.
14. Taifour D, Frencken JE, Beiruti N, van 't Hof MA, Truin GJ, Van Palenstein Helderman WH (2003). Comparison between restorations in the permanent dentition produced by hand and rotary instrumentation-survival after 3 years. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 31:122-128.