|
Volumn 81, Issue 4-5, 2010, Pages 1431-1437
|
Comparison between phase-transfer and cloud-point methodologies for the micellar extraction of biogenic amines
|
Author keywords
Biogenic amines; Cloud point extraction; Matrix effects; Phase transfer extraction; Surfactant based extractions
|
Indexed keywords
BEER;
CHLORINE COMPOUNDS;
EXTRACTION;
IONIC STRENGTH;
POLYETHYLENE OXIDES;
SURFACE ACTIVE AGENTS;
BIOGENIC AMINES;
CLOUD POINT EXTRACTIONS;
CLOUD POINT TECHNIQUE;
DERIVATIZATION REACTION;
EXTRACTION PROCEDURE;
MATRIX EFFECTS;
MICELLAR EXTRACTION;
PHASE TRANSFER;
AMINES;
BIOGENIC AMINE;
DANSYL CHLORIDE;
DETERGENT;
ION;
MACROGOL DERIVATIVE;
MICELLE;
NONIDET P-40;
SURFACTANT;
CALIBRATION;
CHEMISTRY;
COMPARATIVE STUDY;
FOOD ANALYSIS;
FOOD CONTAMINATION;
MICELLE;
PH;
REGRESSION ANALYSIS;
REPRODUCIBILITY;
TEMPERATURE;
TIME;
BIOGENIC AMINES;
CALIBRATION;
DANSYL COMPOUNDS;
DETERGENTS;
FOOD ANALYSIS;
FOOD CONTAMINATION;
HYDROGEN-ION CONCENTRATION;
IONS;
MICELLES;
POLYETHYLENE GLYCOLS;
REGRESSION ANALYSIS;
REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;
SURFACE-ACTIVE AGENTS;
TEMPERATURE;
TIME FACTORS;
|
EID: 77952105675
PISSN: 00399140
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1016/j.talanta.2010.02.043 Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (6)
|
References (39)
|