On the tautology of the matching law in consumer behavior analysis

Behavioural Processes

Volumn 84, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 390-399

  Curry, Bruce ^a   Foxall, Gordon R ^a   Sigurdsson, Valdimar ^b  

^a CARDIFF UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b REYKJAVIK UNIVERSITY   (Iceland)

Author keywords

Consumer behavior analysis; Matching law; Tautology; Translational extensions

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIORAL RESPONSE; CONSUMPTION BEHAVIOR; COST; NUMERICAL MODEL;

ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR CONTROL; BEHAVIORAL SCIENCE; CONSUMER ATTITUDE; DECISION MAKING; DEPENDENT VARIABLE; ECONOMICS; HUMAN; INDEPENDENT VARIABLE; REINFORCEMENT; THEORETICAL MODEL;

ALGORITHMS; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; HUMANS; MODELS, ECONOMETRIC; REGRESSION ANALYSIS;

EID: 77951979390     PISSN: 03766357     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.beproc.2010.02.009     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Alferink L.A., Critchfield T.S., Hitt J.L., Higgins W.J. Generality of the matching law as a descriptor of shot selection in basketball. J. Appl. Behav. Anal. 2009, 42:595-608.
2. Alhadeff D.A. Microeconomics and Human Behavior: Toward a New Synthesis of Economics and Psychology 1982, University of California Press, Berkeley, CA.
3. Baum W.M. On two types of deviation from the matching law: bias and under-matching. J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 1974, 22:231-242.
4. Baum W.M. Matching, undermatching, and overmatching in studies of choice. J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 1979, 23:45-53.
5. Baum W.M., Nevin J.A. Maximization theory: some empirical problems. Behav. Brain Sci. 1981, 4:389-390.
6. Commons M., Herrnstein R.J., Rachlin H. Quantitative Analyses of Behavior, vol. II. Matching and Maximizing Accounts 1982, Ballinger, Cambridge, MA.
7. Critchfield T.S., Paletz E.M., MacAleese K.R., Newland M.C. Punishment in human choice: direct or competitive suppression?. J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 2003, 80:1-27.
8. Davidson M., McCarthy D. The Matching Law: A Research Review 1988, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
9. de Villiers P.A. Choice in concurrent schedules and a quantitative formulation of the law of effect. Handbook of Operant Behavior 1977, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ. W.K. Honig, J.E.R. Staddon (Eds.).
10. de Villiers P.A. Toward a quantitative theory of punishment. J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 1980, 33:15-25.
11. de Villiers P.A., Herrnstein R.J. Toward a law of response strength. Psychol. Bull. 1976, 83:1131-1153.
12. DiClemente D.F., Hantula D.A. Optimal foraging online: increasing sensitivity to delay. Psychol. Market. 2003, 20:785-809.
13. Ehrenberg A.S.C. Repeat Buying: Facts. Theory and Applications 1988, Oxford University Press, New York.
14. Fagerstrøm, A., in press. The motivating effect of antecedent stimuli on the web shop: a conjoint analysis of the impact of antecedent stimuli at the point of online purchase. J. Org. Behav. Manage.
15. Fagerstrøm, A., Arntzen, E., Foxall, G.R., submitted for publication. Matching Analysis of On-line Consumer Choice.
16. Farley J. Reinforcement and punishment effects on concurrent schedules: a test of two models. J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 1980, 33:311-326.
17. Foxall G.R. The substitutability of brands. Manage. Decis. Econ. 1999, 20:241-257.
18. Foxall G.R. The marketing firm. J. Econ. Psychol. 1999, 20:207-234.
19. Foxall G.R., Schrezenmaier T.C. The behavioural economics of consumer brand choice: establishing a methodology. J. Econ. Psychol. 2003, 24:675-695.
20. Foxall G.R. Consumer Psychology in Behavioral Perspective 1990/2004, Routledge, New York, (reprinted 2004 by Beard Books, Frederick, MD).
21. Foxall G.R. Consumer Behavior Analysis 2002, Routledge, New York.
22. Foxall G.R., James V.K. Behavior analysis of consumer brand choice: a preliminary analysis. Eur. J. Behav. Anal. 2001, 2:209-220.
23. Foxall G.R., James V. The behavioral ecology of brand choice: how and what do consumers maximize?. Psychol. Market. 2003, 20:811-836.
24. Foxall, G.R., James, V.K., Oliveira-Castro, J.M., Ribier, S., in press-a. Product substitutability and the matching law. Psychol. Rec.
25. Foxall G.R., Oliveira-Castro J.M., Schrezenmaier T.C. The behavioral economics of consumer brand choice: patterns of reinforcement and utility maximization. Behav. Proc. 2004, 65:235-260.
26. Foxall G.R., Oliveira-Castro J.M., James V.K., Schrezenmaier T.C. The Behavioral Economics of Brand Choice 2007, Palgrave Macmillan, New York.
27. Foxall, G.R., James, V.K., Chang, W., Oliveira-Castro, J.M., in press-b. Substitutability and independence: matching analyses of brands and products. J. Org. Behav. Manage.
28. Green L., Freed D.E. The substitutability of reinforcement. J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 1993, 60:141-158.
29. Green L., Rachlin H. Economic substitutability of electrical brain stimulation, food, and water. J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 1991, 55:133-143.
30. Greene W.H. Econometric Analysis 2008, Pearson/Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ. sixth edition.
31. Hantula D.A., DiClemente D.F., Rajala A.K. Outside the box: the analysis of consumer behavior. Organizational Change 2001, 203-223. Context Press, Reno, NV. L. Hayes, J. Austin, R. Houmanfar, M. Clayton (Eds.).
32. Herrnstein R.J. Relative and absolute strength of response as a function of frequency of reinforcement. J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 1961, 4:267-272.
33. Herrnstein R.J. On the law of effect. J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 1970, 13:243-266.
34. Herrnstein R.J. Melioration as behavioral dynamism. Quantitative Analyses of Behavior, vol. II. Matching and Maximizing Accounts 1982, 433-458. Ballinger, Cambridge, MA. M. Commons, R.J. Herrnstein, H. Rachlin (Eds.).
35. Herrnstein R.J. Rational choice theory: Necessary but not sufficient. Am. Psychol. 1990, 45:356-367.
36. Herrnstein R.J. The Matching Law: Papers in Psychology and Economics 1997, Harvard, Cambridge, MA. H. Rachlin, D. Laibson (Eds.).
37. Hursh S., Silberberg A. Economic demand and essential value. Psychol. Rev. 2008, 115:186-198.
38. Iacobucci D., Churchill G.A. Marketing Research: Methodological Foundations 2009, South Western Educational Publishing, Cincinnati, OH.
39. Kagel J.H., Battalio R.C., Green L. Economic Choice Theory: An Experimental Analysis of Animal Behavior 1995, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
40. Kagel J.H., Battalio R.C., Green L., Rachlin H. Consumer demand theory applied to choice behavior of rats. Limits to Action: The Allocation of Individual Behavior 1980, 237-267. Academic, New York. J.E.R. Staddon (Ed.).
41. Killeen P. The matching law. J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 1972, 17:489-495.
42. Logue A.W. The living legacy of the Harvard Pigeon Lab: quantitative analysis in the wide world. J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 2002, 77:357-366.
43. McDowell J.J. On the falsifiability of matching theory. J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 1986, 45:63-74.
44. McDowell J.J. On the classic and modern theories of matching. J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 2005, 84:111-127.
45. Martens B.K., Houk J.L. The application of Herrnstein's law of effect to disruptive and on-task behavior of a retarded adolescent girl. J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 1989, 51:17-27.
46. Meehl P.E. On the circularity of the law of effect. Psychol. Bull. 1950, 47:52-75.
47. Miller H.L. Matching-based hedonic scaling in the pigeon. J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 1976, 26:335-347.
48. Oliveira-Castro, J.M., Foxall, G.R., James, V.K., in press. Economic demand as a function of reinforcement and punishment. J. Org. Behav. Manage.
49. Oliveira-Castro J.M., Foxall G.R., Schrezenmaier T.C. Patterns of consumer response to retail price differentials. Serv. Ind. J. 2005, 25:309-327.
50. Oliveira-Castro J.M., Foxall G.R., Schrezenmaier T.C. Consumer brand choice: individual and group analyses of demand elasticity. J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 2006, 85:147-166.
51. Rachlin H. On the tautology of the matching law. J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 1971.
52. Rachlin H., Battalio R., Kagel J., Green L. Maximization theory in behavioral psychology. Behav. Brain Sci. 1981, 4:371-417.
53. Reed D.D., Critchfield T.S., Martens B.K. The generalized matching law in elite sport competition: football play calling as operant choice. J. Appl. Behav. Anal. 2006, 39:281-297.
54. Romanowich P., Bourret J., Vollmer T.R. Further analysis of the matching law to describe two- and three-point shot allocation by professional basketball players. J. Appl. Behav. Anal. 2007, 40:311-315.
55. Romero S., Foxall G.R., Schrezenmaier T.C., Oliveira-Castro J.M., James V.K. Deviations from matching in consumer choice. Eur. J. Behav. Anal. 2006, 7:15-40.
56. Schwartz B., Lacey H. What applied studies of human operant conditioning tell us about humans and about operant conditioning. Human Operant Conditioning and Behavior Modification 1988, John Wiley and Sons Ltd., Chichester. G. Davey, C. Cullen (Eds.).
57. Sigurdsson, V., 2008. Relative Sales and Matching Analysis of Consumers' Brand Choices in Open Settings. Un-published doctoral thesis. Cardiff University.
58. Sigurdsson V., Saevarsson H., Foxall G.R. Brand-placement and consumer choice: an in-store experiment. J. Appl. Behav. Anal. 2009, 42:741-744.
59. Sigurdsson, V., Foxall, G.R., Saevarsson, H., in press. In-store experimental approach to pricing and consumer behavior. J. Org. Behav. Manage.
60. Sigurdsson, V., Engilbertsson, H., Foxall, G.R., in press. The effects of a point-of-purchase display on relative sales: an in-store experimental evaluation. J. Org. Behav. Manage.
61. Smith C.L., Hantula D.A. Pricing effects on foraging in a simulated Internet shopping mall. J. Econ. Psychol. 2003, 24:653-674.
62. Limits to Action: The Allocation of Individual Behavior 1980, Academic, New York. J.E.R. Staddon (Ed.).
63. St.Peter C.C.S., Vollmer T.R., Bourret J.C., Borrero C.S.W., Sloman K.N., Rapp J.T. On the role of attention in naturally occurring matching relations. J. Appl. Behav. Anal. 2005, 38:429-443.
64. Vollmer T.R., Bourret J. An application of the matching law to evaluate the allocation of two- and three-point shots by college basketball players. J. Appl. Behav. Anal. 2000, 33:137-150.
65. Vaughan W., Herrnstein R.J. Stability, melioration, and natural selection. Advances in behavioural economics 1987, vol. 1:185-215. Ablex, Norwood, NJ.