Designs of concept maps and their impacts on readers' performance in memory and reasoning while reading

Journal of Research in Reading

Volumn 33, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 128-147

  Tzeng, Jeng Yi ^a  

^a NATIONAL TSING HUA UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77951953096     PISSN: 01410423     EISSN: 14679817     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9817.2009.01404.x     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Anderson TH, Armbruster BB. Reader and text-Studying strategies. Reading expository material 1982, 219-242. Otto W, White S. In, (Eds.), (pp., New York, Academic Press
2. Ausubel DP. Educational psychology: A cognitive view 1968, New York, Holt, Rinehart and Winston
3. Bean TW, Sorter J, Singer H, Frazee C. Teaching students how to make predictions about events in history with a graphic organizer plus options guide. Journal of Reading 1986, 29:739-745.
4. Bos CS, Anders PL. Effects of interactive vocabulary instruction on the vocabulary learning and reading comprehension of junior-high learning disabled students. Learning Disability Quarterly 1990, 13:31-42.
5. Boyle JR. The effects of a cognitive mapping strategy on the literal and inferential comprehension of students with mild disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly 1996, 19:86-98.
6. Brainerd CJ, Gordon LL. Development of verbatim and gist memory for numbers. Developmental Psychology 1994, 30((2)):163-177.
7. Brainerd CJ, Reyna VF. Memory independence and memory interference in cognitive development. Psychological Review 1993, 100:42-67.
8. Brainerd CJ, Reyna VF. Fuzzy-trace theory and false memory. Current Directions in Psychological Science 2002, 11:164-169.
9. Chmielewski TL, Dansereau DF. Enhancing the recall of text: Knowledge mapping training promotes implicit transfer. Journal of Educational Psychology 1998, 90:407-413.
10. Cliburn JW. Concept maps to promote meaningful learning. Journal of College Science Teaching 1990, 19:212-217.
11. Dansereau DF. 1989, Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA
12. DiCecco VM, Gleason MM. Using graphic organizers to attain relational knowledge from expository text. Journal of Learning Disabilities 2002, 35:306-320.
13. Farah MJ. Knowledge from text and pictures: A neuropsychological perspective. Knowledge acquisition from text and pictures 1989, 59-71. Mandle MLevin JR. In, (Eds.), pp, Amsterdam, North-Holland
14. Graesser AC, Singer M, Trabasso T. Constructing inferences during narrative text comprehension. Psychological Review 1994, 101:371-395.
15. Guri-Rosenblit S. Effects of a tree diagram on students' comprehension of main ideas in an expository text with multiple themes. Reading Research Quarterly 1989, 24:236-247.
16. Hall RH, Dansereau DF, Skaggs LP. Knowledge maps and the presentation of related information domains. Journal of Experimental Education 1992, 61:5-18.
17. Heanen J, Schrijnemakers H. Suffrage, feudal, democracy, treaty... history's building blocks: Learning to teach historical concepts. Teaching History 2000, 98:22-29.
18. Jonassen DH, Reeves TC, Hong N, Harvey D, Peters K. Concept mapping as cognitive learning and assessment tools. Journal of Interactive Learning Research 1997, 8:289-308.
19. Kim A, Vaughn S, Wanzek J, Wei S. Graphic organizers and their effects on the reading comprehension of students with LD: A synthesis of research. Journal of Learning Disabilities 2004, 37:105-118.
20. Lambiotte JG, Dansereau DF, Cross DR, Reynolds SB. Multirelational semantic maps. Educational Psychology Review 1989, 1:331-367.
21. Lampinen JM, Leding JK, Reed KB, Odegard TN. Global gist extraction in children and adults. Memory 2006, 14:952-964.
22. Lee P. Historical knowledge and the national curriculum. Teaching history 1994, 41-48. Bourdillon H. In, (Ed.), pp, London, Routledge
23. Lee P, Shemilt D. A scaffold, not a cage: Progression and progression models in history. Teaching History 2003, 113:13-29.
24. Lee Y, Nelson DW. Viewing or visualising - Which concept map strategy works best on problem-solving performance. British Journal of Educational Technology 2005, 36:193-203.
25. Loman NL, Mayer RE. Signaling techniques that increase the understandability of expository prose. Journal of Educational Psychology 1983, 75:402-412.
26. Medland MB. Tools for knowledge analysis, synthesis, and sharing. Journal of Science Education and Technology 2007, 16:119-153.
27. Miller PH, Bjorklund DF. Contemplating fuzzy-trace theory: The gist of it. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 1998, 71:184-193.
28. Moore DW, Readence JE. A quantitative and qualitative review of graphic organizer research. Journal of Educational Research 1984, 78:11-17.
29. National curriculum working group final report (England and Wales). Teaching history 1994, 27-40. Bourdillon H. National Curriculum History Working Group and National Curriculum History Committee for Wales, In, (Ed.), pp, London, Routledge
30. Nesbit JC, Adesope OO. Learning with concept and knowledge maps: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research 2006, 76:413-448.
31. Neuschatz JS, Lampinen JM, Preston EL, Hawkins ER, Toglia MP. The effect of memory schemata on memory and the phenomenological experience of naturalistic situations. Applied Cognitive Psychology 2002, 16:687-708.
32. Novak J. Concept maps and Vee diagrams: Two metacognitive tools to facilitate meaningful learning. Instructional Science 1990, 19:29-52.
33. Novak J. Meaningful learning: The essential factor for conceptual change in limited or inappropriate propositional hierarchies leading to empowerment of learners. Science Education 2002, 86:548-571.
34. Novak JD, Gowin DB. Learning how to learn 1984, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press
35. Oakhill J, Garnham A, Vonk W. The on-line construction of discourse models. Language and Cognitive Processes 1989, 4:263-286.
36. O'Brien EJ, Albrecht JE. Comprehension strategies in the development of a mental model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1992, 18:777-784.
37. O'Donnell A. Searching for information in knowledge maps and texts. Contemporary Educational Psychology 1993, 18:222-239.
38. O'Donnell AM. Learning from knowledge maps: The effects of map orientation. Contemporary Educational Psychology 1994, 19:33-44.
39. O'Donnell AM, Dansereau DF, Hall RH. Knowledge maps as scaffolds for cognitive processing. Educational Psychology Review 2002, 14:71-86.
40. Rendas AB, Fonseca M, Pinto PR. Toward meaningful learning in undergraduate medical education using concept maps in a PBL pathophysiology course. Advances in Physiology Education 2006, 30:23-29.
41. Rewey KL, Dansereau DF, Peel JL. Knowledge maps and information processing strategies. Contemporary Educational Psychology 1991, 16:203-214.
42. Reyna VF, Kiernan B. Development of gist versus verbatim memory in sentence recognition: Effects of lexical familiarity, semantic content, encoding instructions, and retention interval. Developmental Psychology 1994, 30((2)):178-191.
43. Robinson DH, Katayama AD, Fan AC. Evidence for conjoint retention of information encoded from spatial adjunct displays. Contemporary Educational Psychology 1996, 21:221-239.
44. Robinson DH, Kiewra KA. Visual argument: Graphic organizers are superior to outlines in improving learning from test. Journal of Educational Psychology 1995, 87:455-467.
45. Robinson DH, Molina E. The relative involvement of visual and auditory working memory when studying adjunct displays. Contemporary Educational Psychology 2002, 27:118-131.
46. Robinson DH, Schraw G. Computational efficiency through visual argument: Do graphic organizers communicate relations in text too effectively? Contemporary Educational Psychology 1994, 19:399-415.
47. Van Dijk TA, Kintsch W. Strategies of discourse comprehension 1983, San Diego, CA, Academic Press
48. Van Drie J, Van Boxtel C. Developing conceptual understanding through talk and mapping. Teaching History 2003, 110:27-31.
49. Vekiri I. What is the value of graphical displays in learning? Educational Psychology Review 2002, 14:261-311.