Evidence for conjoint retention of information encoded from spatial adjunct displays

Contemporary Educational Psychology

Volumn 21, Issue 3, 1996, Pages 221-239

  Robinson, Daniel H ^a   Katayama, Andrew D ^a   Fan, Ai Chun ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0030186812     PISSN: 0361476X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/ceps.1996.0020     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. BADDELEY, A. (1986). Working memory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
2. BADDELEY, A. (1992). Is working memory working? The Fifteenth Bartlett Lecture. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 44a, 1-31.
3. BADDELEY, A. D., & HITCH, G. J. (1974). Working memory. In G. Bower (Ed.), Recent advances in learning and motivation (Vol. 8, pp. 47-90). New York: Academic Press.
4. BEHRENS, J. T., MULVENON, S. W., ROBINSON, D. H., WHITE, M. C., & STOCK, W. A. (1990, June). Quantitative textual and graphic information affect recall across representations. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Society, Dallas, TX.
5. CLARK, J. M., & PAIVIO, A. (1991). Dual coding theory and education. Educational Psychology Review, 3, 149-210.
6. CORKILL, A. J. (1992). Advance organizers: Facilitators of recall. Educational Psychology Review, 4, 33-67.
7. DARCH, C., & GERSTEN, R. (1986). Direction-setting activities in reading comprehension: A relation of two approaches. Learning Disabled Quarterly, 9, 235-243.
8. EGGEN, P., & KAUCHAK, D. (1994). Educational psychology: Classroom connections. New York: MacMillan.
9. GATHERCOLE, S. E., & BADDELEY, A. D. (1993). Working memory and language. Hove, U.K.: Erlbaum.
10. HERBER, H. L., & SANDERS, P. L. (1969). Research in reading in the content areas: first year report. Syracuse University: Reading and Language Arts Center.
11. KRULEY, P., SCIAMA, S. C., & GLENBERG, A. M. (1994). On-line processing of textual illustrations in the visuospatial sketchpad: Evidence from dual-task studies. Memory & Cognition, 22, 261-272.
12. KULHAVY, R. W., STOCK, W. A., PETERSON, S. E., PRIDEMORE, D. R., & KLEIN, J. D. (1992). Using maps to retrieve text: A test of Conjoint Retention. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 17, 56-70.
13. KULHAVY, R. W., LEE, B. J., & CATERINO, L. C. (1985). Conjoint Retention of maps and related discourse. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 10, 28-37.
14. LAMBIOTTE, J. G., DANSEREAU, D. F., CROSS, D. R., & REYNOLDS, S. B. (1989). Multirelational semantic maps. Educational Psychology Review, 1, 331-367.
15. LEVIE, W. H. (1987). Research on pictures: A guide to the literature. In D. M. Willows & H. A. Houghton (Eds.), The psychology of illustration: I. Basic research (pp. 1-50). New York: Springer-Verlag.
16. LEVIN, J. R., & MAYER, R. E. (1992). Understanding illustrations in text. In B. Britton (Ed.) Learning from textbooks (pp. 95-113). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
17. PAIVIO, A. (1986). Mental representation: A dual coding approach. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.
18. ROBINSON, D. H., & KIEWRA, K. A. (1995). Visual argument: Graphic organizers are superior to outlines in improving learning from text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87, 455-467.
19. ROBINSON, D. H., & SCHRAW, G. (1994). Computational efficiency through visual argument: Do graphic organizers communicate relations in text too effectively? Contemporary Educational Psychology, 19, 399-415.
20. WINN, W. (1991). Learning from maps and diagrams. Educational Psychology Review, 3, 211-247.