Viewing or visualising - Which concept map strategy works best on problem-solving performance?

British Journal of Educational Technology

Volumn 36, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 193-203

  Lee, Youngmin ^a   Nelson, David W ^a  

^a FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONCEPT MAP STRATEGY; INSTRUCTIONAL TECHNOLOGY COURSE; KNOWLEDGE-GENERATIVE GROUP;

KNOWLEDGE ACQUISITION; PROBLEM SOLVING;

CONFORMAL MAPPING;

EID: 33645933877     PISSN: 00071013     EISSN: 14678535     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2005.00452.x     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Alpert, S. R. & Grueneberg, K. (2000). Concept mapping with multimedia on the web. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia 9, 313-330.
2. Anderson, J. R. (1995). Cognitive psychology and its implications (4th ed.). NY: W. H. Freeman.
3. Berkowitz, S. (1986). Effects of instruction in text organization on sixth-grade students' memory for expository reading. Reading Research Quarterly 21, 161-178.
4. Clarke, J. H. (1990). Patterns of thinking: integrating learning skills in content teaching. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
5. Coleman, E. B. (1998). Using explanatory knowledge during collaborative problem solving in science. Journal of the Learning Sciences 7, 387-427.
6. Driscoll, M. P. (2000). Psychology of learning for instruction (2nd ed.). MA: Allyn & Bacon.
7. Ferry, B., Hedberg, J. & Harper, B. (1998). How do preservice teachers use concept maps to organize their curriculum content knowledge. Journal of Interactive Learning Research 9, 83-104.
8. Hayes, J. R. (1989). The complete problem solver (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
9. Horn, R. E. (1989). Mapping Hypertext: The Analysis, Organization, and Display of Knowledge for the Next Generation of On-Line Text and Graphics. Lexington, Massachusetts: The Lexington Institute.
10. Jo, I. (2001). The effects of concept mapping on college students' comprehension of expository text. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Florida State University.
11. Jonassen, D. H. (1989). Hypertext/hypermedia. NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
12. Jonassen, D. H. (1997). Instructional design models for well structured and ill structured problem-solving learning outcomes. Educational Technology Research and Development 45, 65-94.
13. Jonassen, D. H. (2000). Toward a design theory of problem solving. Educational Technology: Research & Development 48, 63-85.
14. Jonassen, D. H. (2001). Can You Train Your Employees to Solve Problems: If So, What Kind. Performance Improvement 40, 16-22.
15. Jonassen, D., Beissner, K. & Yacci, M. (1993). Structural knowledge: Techniques for representing, conveying, and acquiring structural knowledge. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
16. Jonassen, D. & Grabowski, B. (1993). Handbook of Individual Differences, learning and Instruction. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
17. Kahney, H. (1993). Problem solving: current issues (2nd ed.). Buckingham, England: Open University press.
18. Kenny, R. F., Grabowski, B. L., Middlemiss, M. & Van Neste-Kenny (1991). The Generative effects of graphic, organizers with computer-based interactive video by global an analytic thinkers. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for the Development of Computer Based Instruction Systems. St. Louise, MO.
19. Kirk, R. E. (1995). Experimental design: procedures for the behavioral sciences. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
20. Kommers, P. A. M., Grabinger, S. & Dunlap, J. C. (1996). Hypermedia learning environments: Instructional design and integration. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
21. Markow, P. G. & Loaning, R. A. (1998). Usefulness of concept maps in college chemistry laboratories: Students' perceptions and effects on achievement. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 35, 1015-1029.
22. Maurer, H., Scherbakov, N. (1996). Multimedia authoring for presentation and education: the official guide to HM-card. Germany: Addison Wesley Publishing Company.
23. Nickerson, R. S. (1994). The teaching of thinking and problem solving. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Thinking and problem solving (pp. 409-449). San Diego, CA: Academic press.
24. Novak, J. D., Gowin, D. B. & Johansen, G. T. (1983). The use of concept mapping and knowledge Vee mapping with junior high school science students. Science Education 67, 625-645.
25. Okebukola, P. A. (1990). Attaining meaningful learning of concepts in genetics and ecology: An examination of the potency of the concept mapping technique. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 27, 493-504.
26. Polya, G. (1973). How to solve it: A new aspect of mathematical method. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
27. Pressley, M. & McCormick, C. (1995). Cognition, Teaching, and Assessment. NY: HarperCollins College Publication.
28. Reed, S. K. (1982). Cognition: theory and application. Monterey. CA: Brooks/Cole Publishing Company.
29. Sherman, R. A. & Grueneberg, K. (2000). Concept mapping with multimedia on the web. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia 9, 313-331.
30. Shirk, H. N. (1992). Cognitive architecture in hypermedia instruction. In E. Barrett (Ed.), Sociomedia: multimedia, hypermedia and the social construction of knowledge (pp. 79-93). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
31. Silver, E. A. & Marshall, S. P. (1990). Mathematical and scientific problem solving: findings, issues, and instructional implications. In B. F. Jones & L. Idol (Eds), Dimensions of thinking and cognitive instruction (pp. 265-290). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
32. Smith, M. U. (1991). A view from biology. In M. U. Smith (Ed.), Toward a unified theory of problem solving (pp. 1-20). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
33. Stanton, N. A., Taylor, R. G. & Tweedie, L. A. (1992). Maps as navigation aids in hypertext: an empirical evaluation. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia 1, 431-444.
34. Sternberg, R. J. (1994). Thinking and problem solving. San Diego, CA: Academic press.
35. Sternberg, R. J. (1996). Cognitive psychology. Orlando, FL: Harcourt Brace College Pub.
36. Stoyanov, S. & Kommers, P. (1999). Agent support for problem solving through concept mapping. Journal of Interactive Learning Research 10, 401-425.
37. Stoyanov, S. (1997). Cognitive mapping as learning method in hypermedia design. Journal of Interactive Learning Research 8, 309-323.
38. Suthers, D. D. & Toth, E. T. (2001). Process and outcome studies of representational guidance for scientific inquiry. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (AERA), April 10-14, 2001, Seattle.
39. Wachter, L. N. (1993). An investigation of the effects of hierarchical concept mapping as a prefatory organizer on fourth-grade students' comprehension and retention of expository rose. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Pennsylvania State University.
40. Wang, H. (1995). Effects of format and student completion of concept mapping on college student's learning. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
41. Zhang, J. (1997). The nature of external representations in problem solving. Cognitive Science 21, 179-217.