What the marketplace has brought us: Item-by-item teaching with little instructional insight

Peabody Journal of Education

Volumn 85, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 246-257

  Shepard, Lorrie A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77951703980     PISSN: 0161956X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01619561003708445     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998) Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy, and Practice, 5(1), 7-74.
2. Blanc, S., Christman, J. B., Liu, R., Mitchell, C., Travers, E., & Bulkley, K. E. (2010/this issue). Learning to learn from data: Benchmarks and instructional communities. Peabody Journal of Education, 85(2), 205-225.
3. Bulkley, K. E., Christman, J. B., Goertz, M. E., & Lawrence, N. R. (2010/this issue). Building with benchmarks: The role of the district in Philadelphia's benchmark assessment system. Peabody Journal of Education, 85(2), 186-204.
4. Burch, P. (2010/this issue). The bigger picture: Institutional perspectives on interim assessment technologies. Peabody Journal of Education, 85(2), 147-162.
5. Deci, E. L., Koestner, R., & Ryan, R. M. (1999). A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 627-668.
6. Deming, W. E. (1986). Out of the crisis. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Center for Advanced Engineering Study.
7. Dweck, C. S. (1999). Self-theories: Their role in motivation, personality, and development. Philadelphia: Taylor & Francis.
8. Elmore, R. (2003). Accountability and capacity. In M. Carnoy, R. Elmore, & L. S. Siskin, The new accountability: High schools and high-stakes testing (pp. 195-209). New York: Routledge Falmer.
9. Farley, T. (2009, September 27). Reading incomprehension. New York Times. Retrieved October 3, 2009, from http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/28/opinion/28farley.html?_r=1&emc=eta1
10. Fisher, L. (2007). Learning about fractions from assessment. In A. H. Schoenfeld (Ed.), Assessing mathematical proficiency (pp. 195-211). New York: Cambridge University Press.
11. Halverson, R. (2010/this issue). School formative feedback systems. Peabody Journal of Education, 85(2), 130-146.
12. Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81-112.
13. Herman, J. L. (2008). Accountability and assessment: Is public interest in K-12 education being served? In K. E. Ryan & L. A. Shepard (Eds.), The future of test-based educational accountability (pp. 211-231). New York: Routledge.
14. Herman, J. L., & Baker, E. L. (2005). Making benchmark testing work. Educational Leadership, 63, 48-54.
15. Kluger, A. N., & DeNisi, A. (1996). The effect of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 254-284
16. Koretz, D., & Hamilton, L. S. (2006). Testing for accountability in K-12. In R. L. Brennan (Ed.), Educational measurement (4th ed., pp. 531-578). Westport, CT: American Council on Education/Praeger.
17. Li, Y., Marion, S., Perie, M., & Gong, B. (2010/this issue). An approach for evaluating the technical quality of interim assessments. Peabody Journal of Education, 85(2), 163-185.
18. Mazur, E. (1997). Peer instruction: A user's manual. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
19. Mehrens, W. A., & Kaminski, J. (1989). Methods for improving standardized test scores: Fruitful, fruitless, or fraudulent? Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 8(1), 14-22.
20. Office of Economic Co-operation and Development. (2005). Formative assessment: Improving learning in secondary classrooms. Paris: OECD Publishing.
21. Nabors Olah, L. N., Lawrence, N. R., & Riggan, M. (2010/this issue). Learning to learn from benchmark assessment data: How teachers analyze results. Peabody Journal of Education, 85(2), 226-245.
22. Pellegrino, J. W., Chudowsky, N., & Glaser, R. (Eds.). (2001). Knowing what students know: The science and design of educational assessment. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
23. Perie, M., Marion, S., & Gong, B. (2009). Moving toward a comprehensive assessment system: A framework for considering interim assessments. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 28(3), 5-13.
24. Polikoff, M., Porter, A. C., & Smithson, J. (2009). The role of state student achievement tests in standards-based reform. Working Paper. Philadelphia: Graduate School of Education, University of Pennsylvania.
25. Scriven, M. S. (1967). The methodology of evaluation. In R. Tyler, R. Gagne, & M. Scriven (Eds.), Perspectives of curriculum evaluation (pp. 39-83). Chicago: Rand McNally.
26. Scriven, M. S. (1974). Evaluation perspectives and procedures. In W. J. Popham (Ed.), Evaluation in education: Current applications (pp. 3-33). Berkeley, CA: McCutcheon
27. Shepard, L. A. (2008). Formative assessment: Caveat emptor. C. A. Dwyer (Ed.), The future of assessment: Shaping teaching and learning (pp. 279-303). New York: Erlbaum.
28. Shute, V. J. (2008). Focus on formative feedback. Review of Educational Research, 78(1), 153-189.
29. Stallman, A. C., & Pearson, P. D. (1990). Formal measures of early literacy. In L. M. Morrow & J. K. Smith (Eds.), Assessment for instruction in early literacy (pp. 7-44). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
30. U. S. Congress, Office of Technology Assessment. (1992). Testing in American schools: Asking the right questions (OTA-SET-519). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.