Learning to learn from Benchmark assessment data: How teachers analyze results

Peabody Journal of Education

Volumn 85, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 226-245

  Oláh, Leslie Nabors ^a   Lawrence, Nancy R ^b   Riggan, Matthew ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^b The 21 Century Partnership for STEM Education Advancing Science   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77951724018     PISSN: 0161956X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01619561003688688     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Bangert-Drowns, R. L., Kulik, J. A., & Morgan, M. T. (1991). The instructional effect of feedback in test-like events. Review of Educational Research, 61, 213-238.
2. Baroody, A. J., Feil, Y., & Johnson, A. R. (2007). An alternative reconceptualization of conceptual and procedural knowledge. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 38, 115-131.
3. Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), 7-75.
4. Bulkley, K. E., Christman, J. B., Goertz, M. E., & Lawrence, N. R. (2010/this issue). Building with benchmarks: The role of the district in Philadelphia's benchmark assessment system. Peabody Journal of Education, 85(2), 186-204.
5. Fuchs, L. S., & Fuchs, D. (1986). Effects of systematic formative evaluation: A meta-analysis. Exceptional Children, 53, 199-208.
6. Kluger, A. N., & DeNisi, A. (1996). The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 254-284.
7. Nabors Olah, L., Lawrence, N., Goertz, M., Weathers, J., Riggan, M., & Anderson, J. (2007, April). Testing to the test? Expectations and supports from interim assessment use. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.
8. Perie, M., Marion, S., Gong, B., & Wurtzel, J. (2007). The role of interim assessments in a comprehensive assessment system: A policy brief. Washington, DC: The Aspen Institute.
9. School District of Philadelphia. (2006). A year at a glance: Planning and scheduling timelines, 2006-2007. Philadelphia: Author.