An approach for evaluating the technical quality of interim assessments

Peabody Journal of Education

Volumn 85, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 163-185

  Li, Ying ^a   Marion, Scott ^b   Perie, Marianne ^b   Gong, Brian ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

^b National Center for the Improvement of Assessment   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77951748501     PISSN: 0161956X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01619561003685304     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education. (1999). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
2. Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2006). Developing a theory of formative assessment. In J. Gardner (Ed.), Assessment and learning (pp. 81-100). London: Sage.
3. Herman, J. L., & Baker, E. L. (2005). Making benchmark testing work. Assessment to Promote Learning, 63, 48-54.
4. Messick, S. (1989). Validity. In R. L. Linn (Ed.), Educational measurement (3rd ed., pp. 13 103). New York: American Council on Education, Macmillan.
5. National Research Council. (1999). High stakes: testing for tracking, promotion, and graduation. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
6. New Mexico Public Education Department Division of Assessment and Accountability. (2006). Consumer guide to formative assessments. Santa Fe, NM: Author.
7. Perie, M., Marion, S. F., & Gong, B. (2007). Moving towards a comprehensive assessment system: A framework for considering interim assessments. Dover, NH: The National Center for the Improvement of Educational Assessment, Inc. Available at http://www.nciea.org.
8. Perie, M., Marion, S. F., & Gong, B. (2009). Moving towards a comprehensive assessment system: A framework for considering interim assessments. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 28(3), 5-13.
9. Shepard, L. A. (2000). The role of assessment in a learning culture. Educational Researcher, 29(7), 4-14.
10. Shepard, L. A. (2006, June). Can benchmark assessments be formative?: Distinguishing formative assessment from formative program evaluation. Paper presented at the CCSSO Large Scale Assessment Conference, San Francisco, CA.
11. South Carolina State Board of Education. (2006). 2007-08 formative assessment list for South Carolina: Stage one submission cover sheet. Columbia, SC: Author.
12. Stecher, B. M., Epstein, S., Hamilton, L. S., Marsh, J. A., Robyn, A., McCombs, J. S., et al. (2008). Pain and gain: Implementing No Child Left Behind in three states, 2004-2006. Santa Monica, CA: Rand.
13. Webb, N. L. (1999, August). Alignment of science and mathematics standards and assessments in four states (Research Monograph No. 18). Washington, DC: Council of Chief State School Officers.