Exploring technology diffusion: Case of information technologies

International Journal of Information Technology and Decision Making

Volumn 9, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 195-222

  Tanoglu, Ilda ^a   Basoglu, Nuri ^a   Daim, Tugrul ^b  

^a BOGAZICI UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering   (United States)

Author keywords

Decision making; Infusion; Perception; Technology adoption; Technology diffusion

Indexed keywords

EID: 77951686563     PISSN: 02196220     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1142/S0219622010003786     Document Type: Article

References (81)

1. Y. Peng, G. Kou, Y. Shi and Z. A. Chen, A descriptive framework for the field of data mining and knowledge discovery, Int. J. Inf. Technol. Decis. Mak. 7 (4) (2008).
2. K. Bagchi and S. Mukhopadhyay, Predicting global internet growth using augmented diffusion, fuzzy regression and neural network models, Int. J. Inf. Technol. Decis. Mak 5 (1) (2006) 155-171. (Pubitemid 44099608)
3. C. Huang, T. Zong and Z. Chen, Four models to calculate a fuzzy probability distribution with a small sample, Int. J. Inf. Technol. Decis. Mak. 6 (4) (2007) 611-623.
4. E. M. Rogers, Diffusion of Innovations, 1st edn. (The Free Press, New York, USA, 1962).
5. E. M. Rogers, Diffusion of Innovations, 4th edn. (The Free Press, New York, 1965).
6. T. H. Kwon and R. W. Zmud, Unifying the fragmented models of information systems implementation, in Critical Issues in Information Systems Research, eds. R. J. Boland Jr, R. A. Hirschheim (Wiley, New York, 1987).
7. T. M. Somers and K. G. Nelson, A taxonomy of players and activities across the ERP project life cycle, Inf. Manage. 41 (2004) 257-278.
8. V. C. Faltsman, Diffusion of technologies and the restructuring of the former Soviet economy, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 41 (3) (1992) 309-317.
9. C. W. I. Pistorius and J. M. Utterback, The death knells of mature technologies, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 50 (3) (1995) 133-151.
10. P. A. Geroski, Models of technology diffusion, Res. Policy 29 (2000).
11. F. Bass, A new product growth model for consumer durables, Manage. Sci. 15 (1969) 215-227.
12. M. Fishbein and I. Ajzen, Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research (Addison-Wesley Reading, Massachusetts, USA, 1975).
13. F. D. Davis, A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems: Theory and results, Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (1986).
14. I. Ajzen, The theory of planned behavior, Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 50 (1991) 179-211.
15. S. Taylor and P. A. Todd, Understanding information technology usage: A test of competing models, Inf. Syst. Res. 6 (1995) 144-176. (Pubitemid 126102974)
16. V. Venkatesh and F. D. Davis, A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies, Manage. Sci. 46 (2000) 186-204. (Pubitemid 30594361)
17. V. Venkatesh, M. G. Morris, G. B. Davis and F. D. Davis, User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view, MIS Quarterly 27 (2003).
18. M. Y. Siyal, B. S. Chowdhry and A. Q. Rajput, Socio-economic factors and their influence on the adoption of e-commerce by comsumers in singapore, Int. J. Inf. Technol. Decis. Mak. 5 (2) (2006) 317-329.
19. R. Cooper and R. W. Zmud, Information technology implementation research: A technological diffusion approach. Manage. Sci. 32 (1990) 123-139.
20. R. W. Zmud and L. E. Apple, Measuring information technology infusion, Prod. Innov. Manage. 9 (1992) 148-155.
21. L. B. Eder and M. Igbaria, Determinants of intranet diffusion and infusion, Omega: Int. J. Manage. Sci. 29 (2001) 233-242.
22. G. J. Castner and C. B. Ferguson, Development of a scale for measuring software diffusion, in 31st Hawaii Int. Conf. Syst. Sci. 6 (1998) 518-528.
23. F. Rowe, Are decision support systems getting people to conform? The impact of work organization and segmentation on user behavior in a French bank, J. Inf. Technol. 20 (2005) 103-116. (Pubitemid 40818708)
24. L. Mathiassen, I. Andersson and K. Hanson, Service provision in a software technology unit, J. Inf. Technol. 18 (2003) 195-209. (Pubitemid 37406518)
25. Z. Lee and J. Lee, An ERP implementation case study from a knowledge transfer perspective, J. Inf. Technol. 15 (2000) 281-288. (Pubitemid 33213772)
26. J. C. Brancheau and J. C. Wetherbe, The adoption of spreadsheet software: Testing innovation diffusion theory in the context of end-user computing, Inf. Syst. Res. 1 (2) (1990) 123-139.
27. H. A. Simon, The New Science of Management Decision (Harper and Row, New York, USA, 1960).
28. E. O'Donnell and J. S. David, How information systems influence user decisions: A research framework and literature review, Int. J. Account. Inf. Syst. 1 (2000) 178-203.
29. J. E. McGrath, Groups: Interaction and Performance (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, USA, 1994).
30. J. F. Yates, Judgment and Decision Making (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, USA, 1990).
31. J. Payne, J. Bettman and E. Johnson, The Adaptive Decision Maker (Cambridge University Press, New York, USA, 1993).
32. N. S. Thomaidis, The evaluation of information technology projects: A fuzzy mul-ticriteria decision-making approach, Int. J. Inf. Technol. Decis. Mak. 5 (1) (2006) 89-122. (Pubitemid 44099606)
33. S. Zahir, Eliciting ratio preferences for the analytic hierarchy process with visual interfaces: A new mode of preference measurement, Int. J. Inf. Technol. Decis. Mak. 5 (2) (2006) 245-261. (Pubitemid 44099655)
34. H. Mintzberg, The Nature of Managerial Work (Harper and Row, New York, USA, 1973).
35. I. Tanoglu and N. Basoglu, Exploring the relationship between information technology diffusion and managerial decision making, in Proc. Portland Int. Conf. Manage. Eng. Technol.'05, Oregon, USA, 2005.
36. E. F. Harrison, The Managerial DM Process, 3rd. edn. (Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston, USA, 1987).
37. I. Tanoglu and N. Basoglu, Information technology (IT) diffusion: An analysis of user behavior in the exploitation of IT, to appear in Proc. Portland Int. Conf. Manag. Eng. Technol.'06, Istanbul, Turkey, 2006.
38. K. C. Laudon and J. P. Laudon, Essentials of Management Information Systems: Managing the Digital Firm (Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, USA, 2003).
39. R. G. Fichman, Information technology diffusion: A review of empirical research, in Proc. Thirteenth Int. Conf. Inf. Syst. Dallas, TX (1992), pp. 195-206.
40. R. Schultheis and M. Sumner, Management Information Systems: The Manager's View, 4th edn. (McGraw-Hill, Irwin, USA, 1998).
41. K. A. Patterson, C. M. Grimm and T. M. Crosi, Adopting new technologies for supply chain management, Transp. Res. Part E: Logistics Transp. Rev. 39 (2) (2003) 95-121. (Pubitemid 36141468)
42. M. J. J. M. Candel and J. M. E. Pennings, Attitude-based models for binary choices: A test of choices involving an innovation, J. Econ. Psychol. 20 (5) (1999) 547-569.
43. P. Roberts and R. Henderson, Information technology acceptance in a sample of government employees: A test of the technology acceptance model, Interact. Comput. 12 (5) (2000) 427-443. (Pubitemid 30552334)
44. J. Lim, A conceptual framework on the adoption of negotiation support systems, Inf. Softw. Technol. 45 (8) (2003) 469-477.
45. J. H. Wu and S. C. Wang, What drives mobile commerce? An empirical evaluation of the revised technology acceptance model, Inf. Manage. 42 (5) (2004) 719-729.
46. M. Workman, Expert decision support system use, disuse, and misuse: A study using the theory of planned behavior, J. Comput. Human Behav. 21 (2005) 211-231.
47. E. Huang and M. H. Chuang, Extending the theory of planned behavior as a model to explain post-merger employee behavior of IS use, Comput. Human Behav. 23 (1) (2007) 240-257. (Pubitemid 44278492)
48. V. Peansupap and H. T. W. Derek, Factors enabling information and communication technology diffusion and actual implementation in construction organizations, Electron. J. Inf. Technol. Constr. 10 (2005) 193-218. (Pubitemid 41231553)
49. F. Tabak and S. H. Barr, Propensity to adopt technological innovations: The impact of personal characteristics and organizational context, J. Eng. Technol. Manage. 16 (3) (1999) 247-270. (Pubitemid 30519439)
50. V. S. Lai and L. Honglei, Technology acceptance model for internet banking: An invariance analysis, Inf. Manage. 42 (2) (2005) 373-386.
51. V. Venkatesh and F. D. Davis, A model of the antecedents of perceived ease of use: Development and test, Decis. Sci. 27 (1996) 451-481. (Pubitemid 127024023)
52. R. Agarwal and J. Prasad, The antecedents and consequents of user perceptions in information technology adoption, Decis. Support Syst. 22 (1) (1998) 15-29. (Pubitemid 128416339)
53. S. Y. Hung, C. Y. Ku and C. M. Chang, Critical factors of WAP services adoption: An empirical study, Electron. Comm. Res. Appl. 2 (1) (2003) 42-60.
54. M. J. Brosnan, Modeling technophobia: A case for word processing, Comput. Human Behav. 15 (2) (1999) 105-121.
55. A. G. M. Pijpers et al., Senior executives' use of information technology, Inf. Softw. Technol. 43 (2001) 959-971.
56. M. Y. Yi and Y. Hwang, Predicting the use of web-based information systems: Self-efficacy, enjoyment, learning, goal orientation, and the technology acceptance model, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 59 (2003) 431-449.
57. S. Liaw et al., Attitudes toward search engines as a learning assisted tool: Approach of Liaw and Huang's research model, Comput. Human Behav. 22 (2006) 177-190. (Pubitemid 41563023)
58. L. Chen, M. L. Gillenson and D. L. Sherrell, Enticing online consumers: An extended technology acceptance perspective, Inf. Manage. 39 (8) (2002) 705-719. (Pubitemid 34661516)
59. M. T. Dishaw and D. M. Strong, Extending the technology acceptance model with task-technology fit constructs, Inf. Manage. 36 (1) (1999) 9-21.
60. S. H. Kim et al., A methodology of constructing a decision path for IT investment, J. Strat. Inf. Syst. 9 (2000) 17-38.
61. H. Van der Heijden, Factors influencing the usage of websites: The case of a generic portal in The Netherlands, Inf. Manage. 40 (6) (2003) 541-549.
62. T. J. Andersen, Information technology, strategic decision-making approaches and organizational performance in different industrial settings, J. Strat. Inf. Syst. 10 (2001) 101-119.
63. J. S. Ash, Organizational factors that influence information technology diffusion in academic health sciences centers, J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 4 (2) (1997) 102-111.
64. A. Bajaj and S. R. Nidumolu, A feedback model to understand information system usage, Inf. Manage. 33 (4) (1998) 213-225. (Pubitemid 128424768)
65. M. E. Burkhardt, Social interaction effects following a technological change: A longitudinal investigation, Acad. Manage. J. 37 (1994) 869-896.
66. K. S. Cameron and R. E. Quinn, Diagnosing and Changing Organizational Culture (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1999).
67. W. Cheung, M. K. Chang and V. S. Lai, Prediction of internet and world wide web usage at work: A test of an extended triandis model, Decis. Support Syst. 30 (2000) 83-100. (Pubitemid 32033664)
68. C. M. Chiu, Applying means-end chain theory to eliciting system requirements and understanding users' perceptual orientations, Inf. Manage. 42 (3) (2005) 455-468.
69. J. G. Covin, D. P. Slevin and M. B. Heeley, Strategic DM in an intuitive vs. technocratic mode: Structural and environmental considerations, J. Bus. Res. 52 (1) (2001) 51-67.
70. S. C. Currall and T. A. Judge, Measuring trust between organizational boundary role persons, Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 64 (1995) 151-170.
71. M. S. Featherman and P. A. Pavlou, Predicting e-services adoption: A perceived risk facets perspective, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud., Special Issue on HCI and MIS, 59 (4) (2003) 397-522.
72. E. J. Garrity et al., An experimental investigation of web-based information systems success in the context of electronic commerce, Decis. Support Syst. 39 (3) (2005) 485-503.
73. E. E. Grandon and J. M. Pearson, Electronic commerce adoption: An empirical study of small and medium US businesses, Inf. Manage. 42 (1) (2004) 197-216.
74. C. L. Hsu and H. P. Lu, Why do people play on-line games? An extended TAM with social influences and flow experience, Inf. Manage. 41 (2004) 853-868.
75. S. S. Liaw and H. M. Huang, An investigation of user attitudes toward search engines as an information retrieval tool, Comput. Human Behav. 19 (6) (2003) 751-765.
76. B. P. Robichaux, Sex and beliefs about computer-based information systems: An examination of group support systems, Omega 22 (4) (1994).
77. H. M. Selim, An empirical investigation of student acceptance of course websites, Comput. Educ. 40 (4) (2003) 343-360.
78. R. K. Sinha and M. Chandrashekaran, A split hazard model for analyzing the diffusion of innovations, J. Mark. 29 (1992) 116-127.
79. B. Suh and I. Han, Effect of trust on customer acceptance of Internet banking, Electron. Commer. Res. Appl. 1 (3) (2003) 247-263.
80. J. M. Van der Heijden, T. Verhagen and M. R. Creemers, Understanding online purchase intentions, contributions from technology and trust perspectives, Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 12 (2003) 41-48. (Pubitemid 36420429)
81. V. Venkatesh, M. G. Morris and P. L. Ackerman, A longitudinal field investigation of gender differences in individual technology adoption decision-making processes, Organ. Behav. Human Decis. Process. 83 (2000) 33-60.