Information technology acceptance in a sample of government employees: A test of the technology acceptance model

Interacting with Computers

Volumn 12, Issue 5, 2000, Pages 427-443

  Roberts, Peter ^a   Henderson, Ron ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CANBERRA   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PERSONNEL; USER INTERFACES;

TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE MODEL (TAM);

HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION;

EID: 0033882557     PISSN: 09535438     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0953-5438(98)00068-X     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Benson D.H. A field study of end user computing: Findings and issues. MIS Quarterly. 7:1983;35-45.
2. J.W. Verity, G. Lewis, G., Computers: The new look. Business Week, 1987, pp. 78-85.
3. T. McCarroll, T. What new age? Time Magazine, 1991, pp. 52-54.
4. Millman Z., Hartwick J. The impact of automated office systems on middle managers an their work. MIS Quarterly. 11:1987;479-491.
5. Clegg C., Axtell C., Damodaran L., Farbey B., Hull R., Lloyed-Jones R., Nicholls J., Sell R., Tomlinson C. Information technology: A study of performance and the role of human and organizational factors. Ergonomics. 40:1997;851-871.
6. Henderson R., Deane F.P., Ward M.J. Occupational differences in computer-related anxiety: Implications for the implementation of a computerized patient management information system. Behaviour and Information Technology. 14:1995;23-31.
7. Hirschheim R., Newman M. Information systems and user resistance: Theory and practice. The Computer Journal. 31:1988;398-408.
8. Ives B., Olson M.H. User involvement and MIS success: a review of research. Management Science. 30:1984;586-603.
9. Kay A.R., Sutton M.J.D. Productivity and quality of working life for office principals and the implications for office automation. Office: Technology and People. 2:1985;267-286.
10. Zmud R.W. Individual differences and MIS success: A review of the empirical literature. Management Science. 25:1979;966-979.
11. Harrison A.W., Rainer K. An examination of the factor structures and concurrent validities for the computer attitude scale, the computer anxiety rating scale and the computer self-efficacy scale. Journal of Educational and Psychological Measurement. 52:1992;735-745.
12. F.P. Deane, R.D. Henderson, K. Barrelle, A. Saliba, D. Mahar, Construct validity of computer anxiety as measured by the computer attitude scale, in: Y. Anzai, K. Ogawa, H. Mony (Eds.), Advances in Human Factors/Ergonomics: Symbiosis of Human and Artifact, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1991, pp. 581-586.
13. Dukes R.L., Discenza R., Couger D. Convergent validity of four computer anxiety scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement. 49:1989;195-203.
14. Henderson R., Deane F., Barrelle K., Mahar D. Computer anxiety: Correlates norms and problem definition in health care and banking employees using the computer attitude scale. Interacting with computers. 7:1995;181-193.
15. Igbaria M., Chakrabarti A. Computer anxiety and attitudes towards microcomputer use. Behaviour and Information Technology. 9:1990;229-241.
16. Bagozzi R.P., Davis F.D., Warshaw P.R. Development and test of a theory of technological learning and usage. Human Relations. 45:1992;659-686.
17. Igbaria M., Torasker K. Impact of end-user computing on the individual: An integrated model. Information Technology and People. 6:1994;271-292.
18. Davis F.D., Bagozzi R.P., Warshaw P.R. Extrinsic and intrinsic motivation to use computers in the workplace. Journal of Applied Psychology. 22:1989;1111-1132.
19. Hudiburg R.A. Relating computer-associated stress to computerphobia. Psychological Reports. 67:1990;311-314.
20. Murphy C.A., Coover D., Owen S.V. Development and validation of the computer self-efficacy scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement. 49:1989;893-899.
21. Bailey J.E., Pearson S.W. Development of a tool for measuring and analyzing computer user satisfaction. Management Science. 29:1983;530-544.
22. Rushinek A., Rushinek S.F. What makes users happy? Communications of the ACM. 29:1986;594-598.
23. F.J. Landy, H. Rastegary, S. otowidlo, S., Human-computer interactions in the workplace: psychosocial aspects of VDT use, in: M. Frese, E. Ulich, W. Dzida (Eds.), Human Computer Interaction in the workplace, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1987, pp. 3-22.
24. Davis F.D., Bagozzi R.P., Warshaw P.R. User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science. 35:1989;982-1003.
25. Davis F.D., Bagozzi R.P., Warshaw P.R. Extrinsic and intrinsic motivation to use computers in the workplace. Journal of Applied Social Psychology. 22:1992;1111-1132.
26. M. Fishbein, I. Ajzen, Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: an introduction to research and theory, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1985.
27. I. Ajzen, Attitudes, Personality and behavior, Open University Press, Milton Keynes, 1988.
28. Sheppard B.H., Hartwick J., Warshaw P. A theory of reasoned action: A meta-analysis of past research with recommendations for modification and future research. Journal of Consumer Research. 15:1998;325-343.
29. Tesser A., Shaffer D.R. Attitudes and attitude change. Annual Review of Psychology. 41:1990;479-523.
30. Ajzen I., Madden T. Prediction of goal-directed behaviour: attitudes, intentions and perceived behavioural control. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 22:1986;453-474.
31. Davis F.D. User acceptance of information technology: System characteristics, user perceptions and behavioral impacts. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies. 38:1993;475-487.
32. Igbaria M., Schiffman S.J., Wieckowski T.J. The respective roles of perceived usefulness and perceived fun in the acceptance of microcomputer technology. Behaviour and Information Technology. 13:1994;349-361.
33. Loyd B.H., Gressard C.P. Reliability and factorial validity of computer attitude scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement. 44:1984;501-505.
34. Bandalos D., Benson J. Testing the factor structure invariance of a computer attitude scale over two grouping conditions. Educational and Psychological Measurement. 50:1990;49-60.
35. LaLomia M.J., Sidowski J.B. Measurement of computer anxiety: A review. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction. 5:1993;239-266.
36. Igbaria M., Parasuraman S. A path analytic study of individual characteristics, computer anxiety and attitudes towards Microcomputers. Journal of Management. 15:1989;373-388.
37. Davis F.D. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly. 13:1989;319-340.
38. I. Ajzen, M. Fishbein, M., Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1980.
39. DeLone W.H. Determinants of success for computer usage in small business. MIS Quarterly. 12:1988;51-61.
40. Igbaria M., Pavri F.N., Huff S.D. Microcomputer applications: An empirical look at usage. Information and Management. 16:1989;187-196.
41. Hotelling (1940).
42. G.V. Glass, K.D. Hopkings, Statistical Methods in Education and Psychology, 2nd ed., Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1984.
43. D.A. Adams, R.R. Nelson, P.A. Todd, Perceived usefulness, ease of use and usage of information technology: a replication, MIS Quarterly/June, 1992, pp. 227-247.
44. R.H. Fazio, How do attitudes guide behavior? In: R.M Sorrentino, E.T. Higgins (Eds.), The Handbook of Motivation and Cognition: Foundations of Social Behavior, Academic Press, New York, 1986, pp. 204-243.
45. H.C. Triandis, Attitude and Attitude Change, Wiley, New York, 1971.
46. H.C. Triandis, Interpersonal Behaviour, Brooks/Cole, Monterey, CA, 1971.
47. Paré G., Elam J. Discretionary use of personal computers by knowledge workers: testing of a social psychological theoretical model. Behaviour and Information technology. 14:1995;215-228.