Mid-term results with a highly congruous mobile-bearing knee prosthesis

Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy

Volumn 18, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 170-180

  Lemaire, Roger G ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LIÈGE   (Belgium)

^b NONE   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Congruous; Knee arthroplasty; Mid term results; Mobile bearing

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CONVALESCENCE; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; JOINT CHARACTERISTICS AND FUNCTIONS; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; KNEE PROSTHESIS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSTHESIS; SURVIVAL;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; KNEE PROSTHESIS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; SURVIVAL ANALYSIS;

EID: 77951252938     PISSN: 09422056     EISSN: 14337347     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00167-009-0883-0     Document Type: Article

References (73)

1. Callaghan JJ, Insall JN, Greenwald AS et al (2001) Mobile-bearing knee replacement: concepts and results. Instr Course Lect 50: 431-449.
2. Lemaire R (2001) Mobile bearing knee prostheses (in French) In: Lemaire R and Witvoet J (eds) Total knee prostheses. Cahiers d'Enseignement de la SOFCOT 81: 57-70.
3. Vertullo CJ, Easley ME, Scott WN, Insall JN (2001) Mobile bearings in primary knee arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 9: 355-364.
4. Banks SA, Markovich GD, Hodge WA (1997) In vivo kinematics of cruciate-retaining and -substituting knee arthroplasties. J Arthroplasty 12: 297-304.
5. Banks S, Bellemans J, Nozaki H et al (2003) Knee motions during maximum flexion in fixed and mobile-bearing arthroplasties. Clin Orthop Relat Res 410: 131-138.
6. Dennis DA, Komistek RD, Mahfouz MR, Haas BD, Stiehl JB (2003) Multicenter determination of in vivo kinematics after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 416: 37-57.
7. Insall JN, Dorr LD, Scott RD, Scott WN (1989) Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 248: 13-14.
8. Ewald FC (1989) The Knee Society total knee arthroplasty roentgenographic evaluation and scoring system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 248: 9-12.
9. Murray DW, Carr AJ, Bulstrode C (1993) Survival analysis of joint replacements. J Bone Joint Surg Br 75: 697-704 Comment in J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1997; 79: 878.
10. Rothman KJ (1978) Estimation of confidence limits for the cumulative probability of survival in life table analysis. J Chronic Dis 31: 557-560.
11. Beard DJ, Pandit H, Price AJ et al (2007) Introduction of a new mobile-bearing total knee prosthesis: minimum three year follow-up of an RTC comparing it with a fixed-bearing device. Knee 12: 448-451.
12. Price AJ, Rees JL, Beard D et al (2003) A mobile-bearing total knee prosthesis compared with a fixed-bearing prosthesis: a multicentre single-blind randomised controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Br 85: 62-67.
13. Metsovitis S, Tsakonas A, Hantzidis P, Tapsis K, Ploumis A, Toptsis K (2004) Rotaglide total knee arthroplasty. 4-12 years postoperative follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Br 86(Suppl II): 192.
14. Morgan M, Brooks S, Nelson RA (2007) Total knee arthroplasty in young active patients using a highly congruent fully mobile prosthesis. J Arthroplasty 22: 525-530.
15. Hudd A, Kunasingam K, Ricketts D, Bush J (2009) A 5 to 8 year follow-up study of the Rotaglide mobile bearing total knee arthroplasty. Int Orthop 33: 675-678.
16. Horwitz MD, Awan S, Chatoo MB, Stott DJ, Powles DP (2009) An 8- to 10-year review of the Rotaglide total knee replacement. Int Orthop 33: 111-115.
17. Wilson CJ, Fitzgerald B, Tait GR (2003) Five year review of the Rotaglide total knee arthroplasty. Knee 10: 167-171.
18. Aglietti P, Baldini A, Buzzi R, Lup D, De Luca L (2005) Comparison of mobile-bearing and fixed-bearing total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 20: 145-153.
19. Jacobs WCH, Anderson PG, Limbeek J, Wymenga AAB (2004) Mobile bearing vs fixed bearing prostheses for total knee arthroplasty for post-operative functional status in patients with osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis. [Systematic Review] Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2): CD003130.
20. KAT Trial Group, Johnston L, MacLennan G, McCormack K, Ramsay C, Walker A (2009) The knee arthroplasty trial (KAT) design features, baseline characteristics, and two-year functional outcomes after alternative approaches to knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 91: 134-141.
21. Biau D, Mullins MM, Judet T, Piriou P (2006) Mobile versus fixed-bearing total knee arthroplasty: mid-term comparative clinical results of 216 prostheses. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 14: 927-933.
22. Kim YK, Kook HK, Kim JS (2001) Comparison of fixed-bearing and mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasties. Clin Orthop Relat Res 392: 101-115.
23. Lädermann A, Saudan M, Riand N, Fritschy D (2008) Fixed-bearing versus mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized clinical and radiological study. Rev Chir Orthop Réparatrice Appar Mot 94: 247-251.
24. Wylde V, Learmonth I, Potter A, Bettinson K, Lingard E (2008) Patient-reported outcomes after fixed- versus mobile-bearing total knee replacement: a multi-centre randomised controlled trial using the Kinemax total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 90: 1172-1179.
25. Ranawat AS, Rossi R, Loreti I et al (2004) Comparison of the PFC-Sigma fixed-bearing and rotating-platform total knee arthroplasty in the same patient: short-term results. J Arthroplasty 19: 35-39.
26. Bhan S, Malhotra R, Kiran K, Shukla S, Bijjawara M (2005) A comparison of fixed-bearing and mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty at a minimum follow-up of 4. 5 years. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87: 2290-2296.
27. Hasegawa M, Sudo A, Uchida A (2009) Staged bilateral mobile-bearing and fixed-bearing total knee arthroplasty in the same patients: a prospective comparison of a posterior-stabilized prosthesis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 17: 237-243.
28. Kim YH, Yoon SH, Kim JS (2007) The long-term results of simultaneous fixed-bearing and mobile-bearing total knee replacements performed in the same patient. J Bone Joint Surg Br 89: 1317-1323.
29. Watanabe T, Tomita T, Fujii M, Hashimoto J, Sugamoto K, Yoshikawa H (2005) Comparison between mobile-bearing and fixed-bearing knees in bilateral total knee replacements. Int Orthop 29: 179-181.
30. Cheng CK, Huang CH, Liau JJ, Huang CH (2003) The influence of surgical malalignment on the contact pressures of fixed and mobile bearing knee prostheses-a biomechanical study. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 18: 231-236.
31. McEwen HM, Fisher J, Goldsmith AA et al (2001) Wear of fixed bearing and rotating platform mobile bearing knees subjected to high levels of internal and external tibial rotation. J Mater Sci: Mater Med 12: 1049-1052.
32. Breugem SJ, Sierevelt IN, Schafroth MU et al (2008) Less anterior knee pain with a mobile-bearing prosthesis compared with a fixed-bearing prosthesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 466: 1959-1965.
33. Yang CC, McFadden LA, Dennis DA, Kim RH, Sharma A (2008) Lateral retinacular release rates in mobile- versus fixed-bearing TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res 466: 2656-2661.
34. Matsuda S, White SE, Williams VG, McCarthy DS et al (1998) Contact stress analysis in meniscal bearing total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 13: 699-706.
35. Sathasivam S, Walker PS, Campbell PA, Rayner K (2001) The effect of contact area on wear in relation to fixed bearing and mobile bearing knee replacements. J Biomed Mater Res 58: 282-290.
36. Fisher J, McEwen H, Tipper J et al (2006) Wear-simulation analysis of rotating-platform mobile-bearing knees. Orthopedics 29(9 Suppl): S36-S41.
37. Grupp TM, Kaddick C, Schwiesau J, Maas A, Stulberg SD (2009) Fixed and mobile bearing total knee arthroplasty-Influence on wear generation, corresponding wear areas, knee kinematics and particle composition. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 24: 210-217.
38. Haider H, Garvin K (2008) Rotating platform versus fixed-bearing total knees: an in vitro study of wear. Clin Orthop Relat Res 466: 2677-2685.
39. Colmar M, Nordin JY (2007) Total knee arthroplasty with the Ceragyr prosthesis: The experience of the GUEPAR Group. Presented at the GUEPAR Meeting, Paris, March 2007. Available at http://www. guepar. org/04-evenements/evenements. asp.
40. Conditt MA, Stein JA, Noble PC (2004) Factors affecting the severity of backside wear of modular tibial inserts. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86: 305-311.
41. Wasielewski RC (2002) The causes of insert backside wear in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop RelatRes 404: 232-246.
42. Dennis DA, Komistek RD (2006) Mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty: design factors in minimizing wear. Clin Orthop Relat Res 452: 70-77.
43. Delport HP, Banks SA, De Schepper J, Bellemans J (2006) A kinematic comparison of fixed and mobile-bearing knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 88: 1016-1021.
44. Bellemans J, D'Hooghe P, Vandenneucker H, van Damme G, Victor J (2006) Soft tissue balance in total knee arthroplasty: does stress relaxation occur perioperatively? Clin Orthop Relat Res 452: 49-52.
45. McPherson EJ, Cushner FD, Schiff CF, Friedman RJ (1994) Natural history of uncorrected flexion contractures following total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 9: 499-502.
46. Abu-Rajab RB, Watson WS, Walker B et al (2006) Peri-prosthetic bone mineral density after total knee arthroplasty. Cemented versus cementless fixation. J Bone Joint Surg Br 88: 606-613.
47. Castel E, Roger B, Camproux A, Saillant G (1999) Mobility of a polyethylene tibial insert in a mobile total knee prosthesis. (in French). Rev Chir Orthop Répar Appar Mot 85: 33-41.
48. Aigner C, Radl R, Pechmann M, Rehak P, Windhager R (2003) In vivo assessment of mobility of meniscal bearings with ultrasound. Orthopäde 32: 287-291.
49. Wasielewski RC, Komistek RD, Zingde SM, Sheridan KC, Mahfouz MR (2008) Lack of axial rotation in mobile-bearing knee designs. Clin Orthop Relat Res 466: 2662-2668.
50. Russo A, Montagna L, Bragonzoni L, Visani A, Marcacci M (2006) Changes in knee motion over the first 3 years with a mobile-bearing prosthesis. Knee 13: 301-306.
51. Bick B, Georis P, Poux X, Lemaire R (2004) In vivo kinematic behaviour of a mobile-bearing knee prosthesis with or without AP translation: a comparative computer-aided radiological study. Presented at the 6th EFORT meeting, Helsinki, 2004. J Bone Joint Surg Br 86(Suppl III): 272.
52. Chiavetta J, Fehring TK, Odum S, Griffin W, Mason JB (2006) Importance of a balanced-gap technique in rotating-platform knees. Orthopedics 29(9 Suppl): S45-S48.
53. Vyskocil P, Gerber C, Bamert P (1999) Radiolucent lines and component stability in knee arthroplasty. Standard versus fluoroscopically-assisted radiographs. J Bone Joint Surg Br 81: 24-26.
54. Caracciolo B, Giaquinto S (2005) Determinants of the subjective functional outcome of total joint arthroplasty. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 41: 169-176.
55. Fisher DA, Dierckman B, Watts MR, Davis K (2007) Looks good but feels bad: factors that contribute to poor results after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 22(6 Suppl 2): 39-42.
56. Fortin PR, Clarke AE, Joseph L et al (1999) Outcomes of total hip and knee replacement: preoperative functional status predicts outcomes at six months after surgery. Arthritis Rheum 42: 1722-1728.
57. Lingard EA, Riddle DL (2007) Impact of psychological distress on pain and function following knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89: 1161-1169.
58. Nuelle DG, Mann K (2007) Minimal incision protocols for anesthesia, pain management, and physical therapy with standard incisions in hip and knee arthroplasties: the effect on early outcomes. J Arthroplasty 22: 20-25.
59. Kim YH, Kim JS (2004) Comparison of anterior-posterior-glide and rotating-platform low contact stress mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86: 1239-1247.
60. Aigner C, Windhager R, Pechmann M, Rehak P, Engeleke K (2004) The influence of an anterior-posterior gliding mobile bearing on range of motion after total knee arthroplasty. A prospective, randomized, double-blinded study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86: 2257-2262.
61. Callaghan JJ, Squire MW, Goetz DD, Sullivan PM, Johnston RC (2000) Cemented rotating-platform total knee replacement. A nine to twelve-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 82: 705-711.
62. Dennis DA, Komistek RD, Scuderi GR, Zingde S (2007) Factors affecting flexion after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 464: 53-60.
63. Oakeshott R, Stiehl JB, Komistek RA, Anderson DT, Haas BD (2003) Kinematic analysis of a posterior cruciate retaining mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 18: 1029-1037.
64. Buechel FF, Buechel FF Jr, Pappas MJ, D'Alesio J (2001) Twenty-year evaluation of meniscal bearing and rotating platform knee replacements. Clin Orthop Relat Res 88: 41-50.
65. Hooper G, Rothwell A, Frampton C (2009) The low contact stress mobile-bearing total knee replacement: A prospective study with a minimum follow-up of ten years. J Bone Joint Surg Br 91: 58-63.
66. Huang CH, Ma HM, Lee YM, Ho FY (2003) Long-term results of low contact stress mobile-bearing total knee replacements. Clin Orthop Relat Res 416: 265-270.
67. Sorrells RB, Voorhorst PE, Murphy JA, Bauschka MP, Greenwald AS (2004) Uncemented rotating- platform total knee replacement: a five to twelve-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86: 2156-2162.
68. Silvestre Munoz A, Almeida Herrero F, Lopez Lozano R, Argüelles Linares F (2008) Comparison of mobile- and fixed-bearing cemented total knee arthroplasty. Acta Orthop Belg 74: 801-806.
69. Nizard RS, Biau D, Porcher R, Ravaud P, Bizot P, Hannouche D, Sedel L (2005) A meta-analysis of patellar replacement in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 432: 196-203.
70. Parvizi J, Rapuri VR, Saleh KJ et al (2005) Failure to resurface the patella during total knee arthroplasty may result in more knee pain and secondary surgery. Clin Orthop Relat Res 438: 191-196.
71. Pakos EE, Ntzani EE, Trikalinos TA (2005) Patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty. A meta-analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87: 1438-1445.
72. Goutallier D, Manicom O, van Driessche S (2008) Total knee arthroplasty with bicruciate preservation: comparison versus the same posterostabilized design at eight years follow-up. Rev Chir Orthop Réparatrice Appar Mot 94: 585-595.
73. Popovic N, Lemaire R (2003) Anterior knee pain with a posterior-stabilized mobile knee prosthesis. The effect of femoral component design. J Arthroplasty 18: 396-400.