Comparison of the PFC Sigma Fixed-Bearing and Rotating-Platform Total Knee Arthroplasty in the Same Patient: Short-Term Results

Journal of Arthroplasty

Volumn 19, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 35-39

  Ranawat, Amar S ^a   Rossi, Roberto ^b   Loreti, Ivano ^c   Rasquinha, Vijay J ^a   Rodriguez, Jose A ^a   Ranawat, Chitranjan S ^a  

^a Ranawat Orthopaedic Center   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TURIN   (Italy)

^c RIZZOLI ORTHOPAEDIC INSTITUTE   (Italy)

Author keywords

Fixed bearing; Mobile bearing; Patient outcomes; Rotating platform; Total knee arthroplasty

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; JOINT MOBILITY; KNEE PAIN; KNEE RADIOGRAPHY; KNEE SOCIETY SCORE; MALE; OSTEOLYSIS; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PROSTHESIS INFECTION; PROSTHESIS LOOSENING; SCORING SYSTEM; SUBLUXATION; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT;

EID: 1642540072     PISSN: 08835403     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2003.08.010     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Buechel FF, Pappas MJ: The New Jersey low-contact-stress knee replacement system: biomechanical rationale and review of the first 123 cemented cases. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 105:197, 1986
2. Ranawat CS, Flynn WF Jr, Deshmukh RG: Impact of modern technique on long-term results of total condylar knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 309:131, 1994
3. Ranawat CS, Ranawat AS: Total knee replacement rehabilitation protocol: author's perspective. J Arthroplasty 18 (Suppl 1):27, 2003
4. Insall JN, Dorr LD, Scott RD, et al: Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop 248:13, 1989
5. Ewald FC: The Knee Society total knee arthroplasty roentgenographic evaluation scoring system. Clin Orthop 248:9, 1989
6. Buechel FF Sr, Bucchel FF Jr, Pappas MJ, et al: Twenty-year evaluation of meniscal bearing and rotating platform knee replacements. Clin Orthop 388:41, 2001
7. Buechel FF, Pappas MJ: Long-term survivorship analysis of cruciate-sparing versus cruciate-sacrificing knee prostheses using meniscal bearings. Clin Orthop 260:162, 1990
8. Callaghan JJ, Squire MW, Goetz DD, et al: Cemented rotating-platform total knee replacement: a nine- to twelve-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 82:705, 2000
9. Diduch DR, Insall JN, Scott WN, et al: Total knee replacement in young, active patients: long-term follow-up and functional outcome. J Bone Joint Surg Am 79:575, 1997
10. Kaper BP, Smith PN, Bourne RB, et al: Medium-term results of a mobile bearing total knee replacement. Clin Orthop 367:201, 1999
11. Ritter MA, Campbell E, Faris PM, et al: Long-term survival analysis of the posterior cruciate condylar total knee arthroplasty: a 10 year evaluation. J Arthroplasty 4:293, 1989
12. Scahi PA, Thornhill TS, Scott RD: Total knee arthroplasty with the PFC system: results at a minimum of ten year and survivorship analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 80:850, 1998
13. Scott RD, Volatile TB: Twelve year experience with posterior cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 205:100, 1986
14. Stern SH, Insall JN: Posterior stabilized prosthesis: results after follow-up of nine to twelve years. J Bone Joint Surg Am 74:980, 1992
15. Ranawat CS, Boachie-Adjei O: Survivorship analysis and results of total condylar knee arthroplasty: eight-to 11-year followup period. Clin Orthop 226:6, 1988
16. Bartel DB, Bicknell VL, Wright TM: The effect of conformity, thickness, and material on stresses in ultra-high molecular weight components for total joint replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 68:1041, 1986
17. Parks NL, Engh GA, Topoleski LD, et al: Modular tibial insert micro-motion: a concern with contemporary knee implants. Clin Orthop 356:10, 1998
18. Engh GA: Failure of the polyethylene bearing surface of a total knee replacement within four years: a case report. J Bone Joint Surg Am 70:1093, 1988
19. Jones VC, Barton DC, Fitzpatrick DP, et al: An experimental model of tibial counterface polyethylene wear in mobile knees: the influence of design and kinematics. Biomed Mater Eng 9:189, 1999
20. Blunn GW, Walker PS, Joshi A, et al: The dominance of cyclic sliding and producing wear in total knee replacements. Clin Orthop 273:253, 1991
21. D'Lima DD, Trice M, Urquhart AG, et al: Comparison between the kinematics of fixed and rotating bearing knee prostheses. Clin Orthop 380:151, 2001
22. D'Lima DD, Trice M, Urquhart AG, et al: Tibiolemoral Conformity and kinematics of rotating-bearing knee prostheses. Clin Orthop 386:235, 2001
23. Komistek RD, Ranawat CS, et al: In vivo kinematic analysis for subjects having either fixed or mobile bearing posterior stabilized knee prosthesis. Presented at the ORS, New Orleans, LA, February 2003
24. Szivek JA, Anderson PL, Benjamin JB: Average and peak contact stress distribution evaluation of total knee arthroplasties. J Arthroplasty 11:952, 1996
25. Kim YH, Kook HK, Kim JS, et al: Comparison of fixed-bearing and mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasties. Clin Orthop 392:101, 2001
26. Callaghan JJ: Mobile-bearing knee replacement: clinical results. A review of the literature. Clin Orthop 392:221, 2001