Peri-prosthetic bone mineral density after total knee arthroplasty

Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - Series B

Volumn 88, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 606-613

  Abu Rajab, R B ^a   Watson, W S ^a   Walker, B ^a   Roberts, J ^a   Gallacher, S J ^a   Meek, R M D ^a  

^a SOUTHERN GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BONE CEMENT;

ADULT; AGED; ANALYSIS OF COVARIANCE; ARTICLE; BONE DENSITOMETRY; BONE DENSITY; BONE STRESS; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COHORT ANALYSIS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DUAL ENERGY X RAY ABSORPTIOMETRY; FEMALE; FEMUR; FEMUR NECK; FOLLOW UP; FRACTURE FIXATION; HUMAN; IMPLANT; KNEE FUNCTION; LUMBAR SPINE; MALE; MORBIDITY; OSTEOLYSIS; OSTEOPENIA; OSTEOPOROSIS; POSTOPERATIVE CARE; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTHESIS; SCORING SYSTEM; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; BONE CEMENTS; BONE DENSITY; BONE DISEASES, METABOLIC; CEMENTATION; DENSITOMETRY, X-RAY; FEMALE; FEMUR; FEMUR NECK; HUMANS; KNEE PROSTHESIS; LUMBAR VERTEBRAE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOPOROSIS; SEX FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 33646830819     PISSN: 0301620X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.88B5.16893     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Buechel FF Sr, Buechel FF Jr, Pappas MJ, D'Alessio J. Twenty-year evaluation of meniscal bearing and rotating platform knee replacements. Clin Orthop 2001;388: 41-50.
2. Robertson DD, Mintzner CM, Weissman BN, et al. Distal loss of femoral bone following total knee arthroplasty: measurement with visual and computer-processing of roentgenograms and dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1994;76-A:66-76.
3. Van Lenthe GH, de Waal Malefijt MC, Huiskes R. Stress shielding after total knee replacement may cause bone resorption in the distal femur. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1997;79-B:117-22.
4. van Loon CJ, Oyen WJ, de Waal Malefijt MC, Verdonschot N. Distal femoral bone mineral density after total knee arthroplasty: a comparison with general bone mineral density. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2001;121:282-5.
5. Tissakht M, Ahmed AM, Chan KC. Calculated stress-shielding in the distal femur after total knee replacement corresponds to the reported location of bone loss. J Orthop Res 1996;14-5:778-85.
6. Petersen MM, Olsen C, Lauritzen JB, Lund B. Changes in bone mineral density of the distal femur following uncemented total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 1995; 10:7-11.
7. Mintzer CM, Robertson DD, Rackemann S, et al. Bone loss in the distal anterior femur after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 1990;260:135-43.
8. Seki T, Omori G, Koga Y, et al. Is bone density in the distal femur affected by use of cement and by femoral component design in total knee arthroplasty? J Orthop Sci 1999;4:180-6.
9. Soininvaara TA, Miettinen HJ, Jurvelin JS, et al. Periprosthetic femoral bone loss after total knee arthroplasty: 1-year follow-up study of 69 patients. Knee 2004;11:297-302.
10. Bohr HH, Lund B. Bone mineral density of the proximal tibia following uncemented arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 1987;2:309-12.
11. Lonner JH, Klotz M, Levitz C, Lotke PA. Changes in bone density after cemented total knee arthroplasty: influence of stem design. J Arthroplasty 2001;16:107-11.
12. Regner LR, Carlsson LV, Karrholm JN, et al. Bone mineral and migratory patterns in uncemented total knee arthroplasties: a randomized 5-year follow-up study of 38 knees. Acta Orthop Scand 1999;70:603-8.
13. Soininvaara TA, Miettinen HJ, Jurvelin JS, et al. Periprosthetic tibial bone mineral density changes after total knee arthroplasty: one-year follow-up study of 69 patients. Acta Orthop Scand 2004;75:600-5.
14. Petersen MM, Nielsen PT, Lauritzen JB, Lund B. Changes in bone mineral density of the proximal tibia after uncemented total knee arthroplasty: a 3-year follow-up of 25 knees. Acta Orthop Scand 1995;66:513-16.
15. Kroger H, Miettinen H, Arnala I, et al. Evaluation of periprosthetic bone using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry: precision of the method and effect of operation on bone mineral density. J Bone Miner Res 1996;11:1526-30.
16. Soininvaara T, Kroger H, Jurvelin JS, et al. Measurement of bone density around total knee arthroplasty using fan-beam dual energy x-ray absorptiometry. Calcif Tissue Int 2000;67:267-72.
17. Cameron HU, Cameron G. Stress-relief osteoporosis of the anterior femoral condyles in total knee replacement: a study of 185 patients. Orthop Rev 1987;16: 449-56.
18. Li MG, Nilsson KG. No relationship between postoperative changes in bone density at the proximal tibia and the migration of the tibial component 2 years after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2001;16:893-900.
19. Insall JN, Dorr LD, Scott RD, Scott WN. Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop 1989;248:13-14.
20. Dawson J, Fitzpatrick R, Murray D, Carr A. Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1998;80-B:63-9.
21. Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis 1987;40:373-83.
22. Trevisan C, Bigoni M, Denti M, Marinoni EC, Ortolani S. Bone assessment after total knee arthroplasty by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry: analysis protocol and reproducibility. Calcif Tissue Int 1998;62:359-61.
23. Stewart A, Black AJ. Bone mineral density in osteoarthritis. Curr Opin Rheumatol 2000;12:464-7.
24. Barrack RL, Nakamura SJ, Hopkins SG, Rosenzweig S. Early failure of cementless mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2004;19(Suppl 2):101-6.
25. Thompson NW, McAlinden MG, Breslin E, et al. Periprosthetic tibial fractures after cementless low contact stress total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2001;16: 984-90.
26. Liow RY, Walker K, Wajid MA, Bedi G, Lennox CM. Functional rating for knee arthroplasty: comparison of three scoring systems. Orthopaedics 2003;26:143-9.