Introduction of a new mobile-bearing total knee prosthesis - Minimum three year follow-up of an RCT comparing it with a fixed-bearing device

Knee

Volumn 14, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 448-451

  Beard, D J ^a   Pandit, H ^a   Price, A J ^a   Butler Manuel, P A ^b   Dodd, C A F ^c   Murray, D W ^a   Goodfellow, J W ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^b East Sussex Healthcare NHS Trust   (United Kingdom)

^c NUFFIELD ORTHOPAEDIC CENTRE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Controlled; Randomised; TKR; Trial

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLICK; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COHORT ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FIXED BEARING KNEE PROSTHESIS; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; KNEE INSTABILITY; KNEE PROSTHESIS; MALE; MOBILE BEARING KNEE PROSTHESIS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; VALIDATION PROCESS;

AGED; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; JOINT INSTABILITY; KNEE PROSTHESIS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 36248972585     PISSN: 09680160     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.knee.2007.08.004     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Price A., Rees J., Beard D., Juszczak E., Carter S., White S., et al. A mobile-bearing total knee prosthesis compared with a fixed-bearing prosthesis. JBJS B 85-B-1 (2003) 62-67
2. Price A., Rees J., Beard D., Robinson B., McLardy-Smith P., Dodd C., et al. In-vivo fluoroscopic assessment of patello-femoral kinematics: a comparison of unicompartmental and total knee replacements. AAOS 69th Annual Meeting. Dallas, Texas (2002)
3. Insall J., Dorr L., Scott R., and Scott W. Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop 248 (1989) 13-14
4. Dawson J., Fitzpatrick R., Murray D., and Carr A. Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg 80-B-1 (1998) 63-69
5. Price A.J., Rees J.L., Beard D., Juszczak E., Carter S., White S., et al. A mobile-bearing total knee prosthesis compared with a fixed-bearing prosthesis. A multicentre single-blind randomised controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Br 85-1 (2003) 62-67
6. Hansson U., Toksvig-Larsen S., Jorn L.P., and Ryd L. Mobile vs. fixed meniscal bearing in total knee replacement: a randomised radiostereometric study. Knee 12-6 (2005) 414-418
7. Russo A., Montagna L., Bragonzoni L., Visani A., and Marcacci M. Changes in knee motion over the first 3 years with a mobile-bearing prosthesis. Knee 13-4 (2006) 301-306
8. Lonner J.H., Siliski J.M., and Scott R.D. Prodromes of failure in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 14-4 (1999) 488-492 Vol.
9. Knight J.L., Atwater R.D., and Guo J. Early failure of the porous coated anatomic cemented unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Aids to diagnosis and revision. J Arthroplasty 12-1 (1997) 11-20
10. Figgie HE, 3rd, Goldberg VM, Heiple KG, Moller HS, 3rd, Gordon NH. The influence of tibial-patellofemoral location on function of the knee in patients with the posterior stabilized condylar knee prosthesis. Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery American Volume 1035;68-7:1035-40.
11. Boesen M.P., Jensen T.T., and Husted H. Secondary knee instability caused by fracture of the stabilizing insert in a dual-articular total knee. J Arthroplasty 19-7 (2004) 941-943