Fixed-bearing versus mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty: A prospective randomized clinical and radiological study;Prothèse totale du genou : étude prospective randomisée comparant les plateaux tibiaux fixes et mobiles

Revue de Chirurgie Orthopedique et Reparatrice de l'Appareil Moteur

Volumn 94, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 247-251

  Ladermann A ^a   Saudan, M ^a   Riand, N ^a   Fritschy, D ^a  

^a GENEVA UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Fixed; Mobile; Tibial Platform; Total knee arthroplasty

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTHRITIS; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; JOINT CHARACTERISTICS AND FUNCTIONS; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; MALE; METHODOLOGY; PAIN; PROSTHESIS; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTHRITIS; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PAIN; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 43049181562     PISSN: 00351040     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.rco.2007.04.004     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Colizza W.A., Insall J.N., and Scuderi G.R. The posterior stabilized total knee prosthesis. Assessment of polyethylene damage and osteolysis after a 10-year-minimum follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am 77 (1995) 1713-1720
2. Diduch D.R., Insall J.N., Scott W.N., Scuderi G.R., and Font-Rodriguez D. Total knee replacement in young, active patients. Long-term follow-up and functional outcome. J Bone Joint Surg Am 79 (1997) 575-582
3. Ranawat C.S., Luessenhop C.P., and Rodriguez J.A. The press-fit condylar modular total knee system. J Bone Joint Surg Am 79 (1997) 342
4. Buechel Sr. F.F., Buechel Jr. F.F., Pappas M.J., and D'alessio J. Twenty-year evaluation of meniscal bearing and rotating platform knee replacements. Clin Orthop 388 (2001) 41-50
5. Callaghan J.J., Squire M.W., Goetz D.D., Sullivan P.M., and Johnston R.C. Cemented rotating-platform total knee replacement: a nine to twelve-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 82 (2000) 705-711
6. Kaper B.P., Smith P.N., Bourne R.B., Rorabeck C.H., and Robertson D. Medium term results of a mobile-bearing total knee replacement. Clin Orthop 367 (1999) 201-209
7. Sorrells R.B., Stiehl J.B., and Voorhorst P.E. Midterm results of mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty in patients younger than 65 years. Clin Orthop 390 (2001) 182-189
8. Buechel F.F., and Pappas M.J. The New Jersey low-contact stress knee replacement system: biomechanical rationale and review of the first 123 cemented cases. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 105 (1986) 197-204
9. Delport H.P., Banks S.A., De Schepper J., and Bellemans J. A kinematic comparison of fixed- and mobile-bearing knee replacements. J Bone Joint Surg Br 88 (2006) 1016-1021
10. Werner F., Foster D., and Murray D.G. The influence of design on the transmission of torque across knee prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg Am 60 (1978) 342-348
11. Russo A., Montagna L., Bragonzoni L., Zampagni M.L., and Marcacci M. Fixation of total knee arthroplasty improved by mobile bearing design. Clin Orthop 437 (2005) 186-195
12. Bottlang M., Erne O.K., Lacatusu E., Sommers M.B., and Kessler O. A mobile-bearing knee prosthesis can reduce strain at the proximal tibia. Clin Orthop 447 (2006) 105-111
13. Cartier P.H., Landreau P.H., Sanouiller J.L., and Laude F. Résultats des prothèses totales de genou LCS à plateau rotatoire. Recul de 5 à 12 ans. Rev Chir Orthop 83 suppl 2 (1997) 32-33
14. Mont M.A., Yoon T.R., Krackow K.A., and Hungerford D.S. Eliminating patellofemoral complications in total knee arthroplasty: clinical and radiographic results of 121 consecutive cases using the Duracon system. J Arthroplasty 14 (1999) 446-455
15. Buechel F.F., and Pappas M.J. New Jersey low contact stress knee replacement system. Ten-year evaluation of meniscal bearings. Orthop Clin North Am 20 (1989) 147-177
16. Keblish P. Results and complications of the LCS (low contact stress) knee system. Acta Orthop Belg 57 Suppl. 2 (1991) 124-127
17. Jordan L.R., Olivo J.L., and Voorhorst P.E. Survivorship analysis of cementless meniscal bearing total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 338 (1997) 119-123
18. Bhan S., Malhotra R., Kiran E.K., Shukla S., and Bijjawara M. A comparison of fixed-bearing and mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty at a minimum follow-up of 4.5 years. J Bone Joint Surg Am 10 (2005) 2290-2296
19. Pagnano M.W., Trousdale R.T., Stuart M.J., Hanssen A.D., and Jacofsky D.J. Rotating platform knees did not improve patellar tracking: a prospective, randomized study of 240 primary total knee arthroplasties. Clin Orthop 428 (2004) 221-227
20. Kim Y.H., Kook H.K., and Kim J.S. Comparison of fixed-bearing and mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasties. Clin Orthop 392 (2001) 101-115
21. Price A.J., Rees J.L., Beard D., Juszczak E., Carter S., White S., et al. A mobile-bearing total knee prosthesis compared with a fixed-bearing prosthesis. A multicentre single-blind randomised controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Br 85 (2003) 62-67
22. Ranawat C.S., Komistek R.D., Rodriguez J.A., Dennis D.A., and Anderle M. In vivo kinematics for fixed and mobile-bearing posterior stabilized knee prostheses. Clin Orthop 418 (2004) 184-190
23. Woolson S.T., and Northrop G.D. Mobile- vs. fixed-bearing total knee arthroplasty: a clinical and radiologic study. J Arthroplasty 19 (2004) 135-140
24. Jacobs W., Anderson P., Limbeek J., and Wymenga A. Mobile bearing vs fixed bearing prostheses for total knee arthroplasty for post-operative functional status in patients with osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2 (2004) CD003130
25. Aglietti P., Baldini A., Buzzi R., Lup D., and De Luca L. Comparison of mobile-bearing and fixed-bearing total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized study. J Arthroplasty 20 (2005) 145-153
26. Watanabe T., Tomita T., Fujii M., Hashimoto J., Sugamoto K., and Yoshikawa H. Comparison between mobile-bearing and fixed-bearing knees in bilateral total knee replacements. Int Orthop 29 (2005) 179-181
27. Luring C., Bathis H., Oczipka F., Trepte C., Lufen H., Perlick L., et al. Two-year follow-up on joint stability and muscular function comparing rotating versus fixed bearing TKR. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 14 (2005) 1-7
28. Hansson U., Toksvig-Larsen S., Jorn L.P., and Ryd L. Mobile vs. fixed meniscal bearing in total knee replacement: a randomised radiostereometric study. Knee 12 (2005) 414-418
29. Biau D., Mullins M.M., Judet T., and Piriou P. Mobile versus fixed-bearing total knee arthroplasty: mid-term comparative clinical results of 216 prostheses. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 14 (2006) 927-933
30. Insall J.N., Windsor R.E., Scott W.N., et al. Surgery of the Knee (1993), Churchill Livingstone, New York
31. Ware Jr. J., Kosinski M., and Keller S.D. A 12-item short-form health survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care 34 (1996) 220-233
32. Insall J.N., Dorr L.D., Scott R.D., and Scott W.N. Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop 248 (1989) 13-14
33. Insall J.N., Ranawat C.S., Aglietti P., and Shine J. A comparison of four models of total knee-replacement prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg Am 58 (1976) 754-765
34. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd edition. (1988), Lawrence Earlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ
35. Akagi M., Matsusue Y., Mata T., Asada Y., Horiguchi M., Iida H., et al. Effect of rotational alignment on patellar tracking in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 366 (1999) 155-163
36. Anouchi Y.S., Whiteside L.A., Kaiser A.D., and Milliano M.T. The effects of axial rotational alignment of the femoral component on knee stability and patellar tracking in total knee arthroplasty demonstrated on autopsy specimens. Clin Orthop 287 (1993) 170-177
37. Berger R.A., Rubash H.E., Seel M.J., Thompson W.H., and Crossett L.S. Determining the rotational alignment of the femoral component in total knee arthroplasty using the epicondylar axis. Clin Orthop 286 (1993) 40-47