Less anterior knee pain with a mobile-bearing prosthesis compared with a fixed-bearing prosthesis

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research

Volumn 466, Issue 8, 2008, Pages 1959-1965

  Breugem, Stefan J M ^a   Sierevelt, Inger N ^a   Schafroth, Matthias U ^a   Blankevoort, Leendert ^a   Schaap, Gerard R ^a   Van Dijk, C Niek ^a  

^a ACADEMIC MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DOUBLE BLIND PROCEDURE; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS; KNEE PAIN; KNEE PROSTHESIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PAIN ASSESSMENT; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; ARTHRALGIA; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; HEALTH SURVEY; JOINT CHARACTERISTICS AND FUNCTIONS; KNEE; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PROSTHESIS;

ADULT; ARTHRALGIA; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; DOUBLE-BLIND METHOD; FEMALE; HEALTH STATUS INDICATORS; HUMANS; KNEE JOINT; KNEE PROSTHESIS; MALE; PAIN MEASUREMENT; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR;

EID: 48849087691     PISSN: 0009921X     EISSN: 15281132     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11999-008-0320-6     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (32)

1. P Aglietti A Baldini R Buzzi D Lup L De Luca 2005 Comparison of mobile-bearing and fixed-bearing total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized study J Arthroplasty. 20 145 153
2. A Baldini JA Anderson P Zampetti H Pavlov TP Sculco 2006 A new patellofemoral scoring system for total knee arthroplasty Clin Orthop Relat Res. 452 150 154
3. RL Barrack T Schrader AJ Bertot MW Wolfe L Myers 2001 Component rotation and anterior knee pain after total knee arthroplasty Clin Orthop Relat Res. 392 46 55
4. RL Barrack MW Wolfe DA Waldman M Milicic AJ Bertot L Myers 1997 Resurfacing of the patella in total knee arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized, double-blind study J Bone Joint Surg Am. 79 1121 1131
5. S Bhan R Malhotra EK Kiran S Shukla M Bijjawara 2005 A comparison of fixed-bearing and mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty at a minimum follow-up of 4.5 years J Bone Joint Surg Am. 87 2290 2296
6. D Biau MM Mullins T Judet P Piriou 2006 Mobile versus fixed-bearing total knee arthroplasty: mid-term comparative clinical results of 216 prostheses Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 14 927 933
7. ME Boeckstyns M Backer 1989 Reliability and validity of the evaluation of pain in patients with total knee replacement Pain. 38 29 33
8. VA Brander SD Stulberg AD Adams RN Harden S Bruehl SP Stanos T Houle 2003 Predicting total knee replacement pain: a prospective, observational study Clin Orthop Relat Res. 416 27 36
9. JJ Callaghan JN Insall AS Greenwald DA Dennis RD Komistek DW Murray RB Bourne CH Rorabeck LD Dorr 2001 Mobile-bearing knee replacement: concepts and results Instr Course Lect. 50 431 449
10. KY Chiu TP Ng WM Tang P Lam 2001 Bilateral total knee arthroplasty: one mobile-bearing and one fixed-bearing J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 9 45 50
11. J Dawson R Fitzpatrick D Murray A Carr 1998 Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total knee replacement J Bone Joint Surg Br. 80 63 69
12. DR Diduch JN Insall WN Scott GR Scuderi D Font-Rodriguez 1997 Total knee replacement in young, active patients: long-term follow-up and functional outcome J Bone Joint Surg Am. 79 575 582
13. GP Duffy RT Trousdale MJ Stuart 1998 Total knee arthroplasty in patients 55 years old or younger: 10- to 17-year results Clin Orthop Relat Res. 356 22 27
14. BD Haas RD Komistek JB Stiehl DT Anderson EJ Northcut 2002 Kinematic comparison of posterior cruciate sacrifice versus substitution in a mobile bearing total knee arthroplasty J Arthroplasty. 17 685 692
15. D Haverkamp SJ Breugem IN Sierevelt L Blankevoort CN van Dijk 2005 Translation and validation of the Dutch version of the Oxford 12-item knee questionnaire for knee arthroplasty Acta Orthop. 76 347 352
16. G Hawker C Melfi J Paul R Green C Bombardier 1995 Comparison of a generic (SF-36) and a disease specific (WOMAC) (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index) instrument in the measurement of outcomes after knee replacement surgery J Rheumatol. 22 1193 1196
17. A Henricson T Dalen KG Nilsson 2006 Mobile bearings do not improve fixation in cemented total knee arthroplasty Clin Orthop Relat Res. 448 114 121
18. JN Insall LD Dorr RD Scott WN Scott 1989 Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system Clin Orthop Relat Res. 248 13 14
19. YH Kim SH Yoon JS Kim 2007 The long-term results of simultaneous fixed-bearing and mobile-bearing total knee replacements performed in the same patient J Bone Joint Surg Br. 89 1317 1323
20. R Maniar 2006 Rationale for the posterior-stabilized rotating-platform knee Orthopedics. 29 9 suppl S23 S27
21. E Most G Li S Schule P Sultan SE Park S Zayontz HE Rubash 2003 The kinematics of fixed- and mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty Clin Orthop Relat Res. 416 197 207
22. HE Muoneke AM Khan KA Giannikas E Hagglund TH Dunningham 2003 Secondary resurfacing of the patella for persistent anterior knee pain after primary knee arthroplasty J Bone Joint Surg Br. 85 675 678
23. DW Murray SJ Frost 1998 Pain in the assessment of total knee replacement J Bone Joint Surg Br. 80 426 431
24. MW Pagnano RT Trousdale MJ Stuart AD Hanssen DJ Jacofsky 2004 Rotating platform knees did not improve patellar tracking: a prospective, randomized study of 240 primary total knee arthroplasties Clin Orthop Relat Res. 428 221 227
25. N Popovic R Lemaire 2003 Anterior knee pain with a posterior-stabilized mobile-bearing knee prosthesis: the effect of femoral component design J Arthroplasty. 18 396 400
26. AJ Price JL Rees D Beard E Juszczak S Carter S White R de Steiger CA Dodd M Gibbons P McLardy-Smith JW Goodfellow DW Murray 2003 A mobile-bearing total knee prosthesis compared with a fixed-bearing prosthesis: a multicentre single-blind randomised controlled trial J Bone Joint Surg Br. 85 62 67
27. AS Ranawat R Rossi I Loreti VJ Rasquinha JA Rodriguez CS Ranawat 2004 Comparison of the PFC Sigma fixed-bearing and rotating-platform total knee arthroplasty in the same patient: short-term results J Arthroplasty. 19 35 39
28. GR Scuderi HD Clarke 2004 Cemented posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty J Arthroplasty. 19 4 suppl 1 17 21
29. GR Scuderi JN Insall NW Scott 1994 Patellofemoral pain after total knee arthroplasty J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2 239 246
30. SH Stern JN Insall 1992 Posterior stabilized prosthesis: results after follow-up of nine to twelve years J Bone Joint Surg Am. 74 980 986
31. DJ Wood AJ Smith D Collopy B White B Brankov MK Bulsara 2002 Patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized trial J Bone Joint Surg Am. 84 187 193
32. ST Woolson GD Northrop 2004 Mobile- vs. fixed-bearing total knee arthroplasty: a clinical and radiologic study J Arthroplasty. 19 135 140