Uncemented rotating-platform total knee replacement: A five to twelve-year follow-up study

Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery

Volumn 86, Issue 10, 2004, Pages 2156-2162

  Sorrells, R Barry ^a   Voorhorst, Paul E ^a,b   Murphy, Jeffrey A ^a,b   Bauschka, Maryrose P ^a,c   Greenwald, A Seth ^a,c  

^a Joint Replacement Clinic   (United States)

^b Synthes Technical Center   (United States)

^c Lutheran Hospital Cleveland   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CEMENT;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FEMUR; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; IMPLANT; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; KNEE PROSTHESIS; KNEE RADIOGRAPHY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PATELLA; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PROSTHESIS; SURVIVAL; SURVIVAL RATE; TIBIA; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 5344246581     PISSN: 00219355     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2106/00004623-200410000-00005     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Argenson JN, O'Connor JJ. Polyethylene wear in meniscal knee replacement. A one to nine-year retrieval analysis of the Oxford knee. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1992;74:228-32.
2. Buechel FF, Pappas MJ, Makris G. Evaluation of contact stress in metal-backed patellar replacements. A predictor of survivorship. Clin Orthop. 1991;273:190-7.
3. Goodfellow JW, O'Connor J. Clinical results of the Oxford knee. Surface arthroplasty of the tibiofemoral joint with a meniscal bearing prosthesis. Clin Orthop. 1986;205:21-42.
4. Matsuda S, White SE, Williams VG 2nd, McCarthy DS, Whiteside LA. Contact stress analysis in meniscal bearing total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 1998;13:699-706.
5. Bert JM. Dislocation/subluxation of meniscal bearing elements after New Jersey low-contact stress total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop. 1990;254:211-5.
6. Weaver JK, Derkash RS, Greenwald AS. Difficulties with bearing dislocation and breakage using a movable bearing total knee replacement system. Clin Orthop. 1993;290:244-52.
7. Callaghan JJ, Squire MW, Goetz DD, Sullivan PM, Johnston RC. Cemented rotating-platform total knee replacement. A nine to twelve-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000;82:705-11.
8. Buechel FF Sr, Buechel FF Jr, Pappas MJ, D'Alessio J. Twenty-year evaluation of meniscal bearing and rotating platform knee replacements. Clin Orthop. 2001;388:41-50.
9. Jordan LR, Olivo JL, Voorhorst PE. Survivorship analysis of cementless meniscal bearing total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop. 1997;338:119-23.
10. Hartford JM, Hunt T, Kaufer H. Low contact stress mobile bearing total knee arthroplasty: results at 5 to 13 years. J Arthroplasty. 2001;16:977-83.
11. Buechel FF. A simplified evaluation system for the rating of knee function. Orthop Rev. 1982;11:97-101.
12. Bach CM, Nogler M, Steingruber IE, Ogon M, Wimmer C, Gobel G, Krismer M. Scoring systems in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop. 2002;399:184-96.
13. Kaplan EL, Meier P. Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. J Am Stat Assoc. 1958;53:457-81.
14. Dorey F, Amstutz HC. The validity of survivorship analysis in total joint arthro-plasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1989;71:544-8.
15. Buechel FF, Pappas MJ. The New Jersey LCS knee replacement system: biomechanical rationale and comparison of cemented and noncemented results (a two to five-year follow-up). Contemp Orthop. 1987;14:52-60.
16. Greenwald AS, Bacon RK, Smith TS. FDA pre-market application (p830055) LCS meniscal bearing knee simulator studies. 1984.
17. Heim CS, Postak PD, Plaxton NA, Greenwald AS. Classification of mobile-bearing knee designs: mobility and constraint. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001;83 Suppl 2:32-7.
18. Morra EA, Postak PD, Greenwald AS. The effects of walking gait on UHM-WPE damage in mobile bearing knee systems: a finite element study. Read at the Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons; 2001 Feb 28-Mar 4; San Francisco, CA.
19. Buechel FF, Pappas MJ. Long-term survivorship analysis of cruciate-sparing versus cruciate-sacrificing knee prostheses using meniscal bearings. Clin Orthop. 1990;260:162-9.
20. Buechel FF, Pappas MJ. New Jersey low contact stress knee replacement system. Ten-year evaluation of meniscal bearings. Orthop Clin North Am. 1989;20:147-77. Erratum in: Orihop Clin North Am. 1989;20:preceding 519.
21. Haas BD, Komistek RD, Dennis DA. In vivo kinematics of the low contact stress rotating platform total knee. Orthopedics. 2002;25(2 Suppl):s219-26.
22. Stiehl JB, Dennis DA, Komistek RD, Keblish PA. In vivo kinematic analysis of a mobile bearing total knee prosthesis. Clin Orthop. 1997;345:60-6.
23. Stiehl JB, Dennis DA, Komistek RD, Crane HS. In vivo determination of condylar lift-off and screw-home in a mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 1999;14:293-9.
24. Stiehl JB, Dennis DA, Komistek RD, Keblish PA. In vivo kinematic comparison of posterior cruciate ligament retention or sacrifice with a mobile bearing total knee arthroplasty. Am J Knee Surg. 2000;13:13-8.
25. Walker PS, Komistek RD, Barrett DS, Anderson D, Dennis DA, Sampson M. Motion of a mobile bearing knee allowing translation and rotation. J Arthroplasty. 2002;17:11-9.
26. Stern SH, Insall JN, Posterior stabilized prosthesis. Results after follow-up of nine to twelve years. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1992;74:980-6.
27. Gill GS, Joshl AB, Mills DM. Total condylar knee arthroplasty. 16- to 21-year results. Clin Orthop. 1999;367:210-5.
28. Ranawat CS, Flynn WF Jr, Saddler S, Hansraj KK, Maynard MJ. Long-term results of the total condylar knee arthroplasty. A 15-year survivorship study. Clin Orthop. 1993;286:94-102.
29. Deshmukh RG, Hayes JH, Pinder IM. Does body weight influence outcome after total knee arthroplasty? A 1-year analysis. J Arthroplasty. 2002;17:315-9.
30. Diduch DR, Insall JN, Scott WN, Scuderl GR, Font-Rodriguez D. Total knee replacement in young, active patients. Long-term follow-up and functional outcome. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1997;79:575-82.
31. Scuderl GR, Insall JN, Windsor RE, Moran MC. Survivorship of cemented knee replacements. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1989;71:798-803.
32. Font-Rodriguez DE, Scuderl GR, Insall JN. Survivorship of cemented total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop. 1997;345:79-86.
33. Brick GW, Scott RD. The patellofemoral component of total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop. 1988;231:163-78.
34. Thomas WH, Ewald FC, Poss R, Sledge CB. Duopatellar total knee arthroplasty. Orthop Trans. 1980;4:329-30.
35. Kobori M, Kamisato S, Yoshida M, Kobori K. Revision of failed metal-backed patellar component of Miller/Galante-I total knee prosthesis. J Orthop Sci. 2000;5:436-8.
36. Healy WL, Wasllewski SA, Takel R, Oberlander M. Patellofemoral complications following total knee arthroplasty. Correlation with implant design and patient risk factors. J Arthroplasty. 1995;10:197-201.
37. Peters JD, Engh GA, Corpe RS. The metal-backed patella. An invitation for failure? J Arthroplasty. 1991;6:221-8.
38. Sorrells RB, Stiehl JB, Voorhorst PE. Midterm results of mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty in patients younger than 65 years. Clin Orthop. 2001;390:182-9.