Information technology project evaluation: An integrated data envelopment analysis and balanced scorecard approach

Expert Systems with Applications

Volumn 37, Issue 8, 2010, Pages 5931-5938

  Asosheh, Abbas ^a   Nalchigar, Soroosh ^b   Jamporazmey, Mona ^b  

^a TARBIAT MODARES UNIVERSITY   (Iran)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEHRAN   (Iran)

Author keywords

Balanced scorecard (BSC); Data envelopment analysis (DEA); Imprecise data; Project selection; Ranking

Indexed keywords

BALANCED SCORECARD (BSC); BALANCED SCORECARD APPROACH; BALANCED SCORECARDS; COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE; EVALUATION CRITERIA; EVALUATION PROCESS; IMPRECISE DATA; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY PROJECTS; INTEGRATED DATA; INTEGRATED DEA MODEL; IT MANAGEMENT; IT PROJECT; NEW APPROACHES; NON-PARAMETRIC TECHNIQUES; OPTIMAL SELECTION; ORDINAL DATA; ORGANIZATIONAL INNOVATION; PROJECT SELECTION; QUALITATIVE FACTORS; REAL WORLD DATA; STRATEGIC RESOURCE;

COMPETITION; DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS; DATA HANDLING; INNOVATION; LINEAR PROGRAMMING; PROJECT MANAGEMENT;

INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY;

EID: 77951208273     PISSN: 09574174     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2010.02.012     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Amin G.R., and Toloo M. Finding the most efficient DMUs in DEA: An improved integrated model. Computers and Industrial Engineering 52 (2007) 71-77
2. Badri M.A., Davis D., and Davis D. A comprehensive 0-1 goal programming model for project selection. International Journal of Project Management 19 (2001) 243-252
3. Banker R.D., Charnes A., and Cooper W.W. Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiency in data envelopment analysis. Management Science 30 (1984) 1078-1092
4. Bhagwat R., and Sharma M.K. Performance measurement of supply chain management: A balanced scorecard approach. Computers and Industrial Engineering 53 (2007) 43-62
5. Bremser W., and Chung Q.B. A framework for performance measurement in the e-business environment. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications 4 (2005) 395-412
6. Camanho A.S., and Dyson R.G. Cost efficiency measurement with price uncertainty: A DEA application to bank branch assessments. European Journal of Operational Research 161 (2005) 432-446
7. Campbell, D., Datar, S., Kulp, S., & Narayanan, V. (2002). Using the balanced scorecard as a control system for monitoring and revising corporate strategy. Working paper. Harvard NOM Research.
8. Chand D., Hachey J.H., Owhoso V., and Vasudevan S. A balanced scorecard based framework for assessing the strategic impacts of ERP systems. Computers in Industry 56 (2005) 558-572
9. Charnes A., Cooper W.W., and Rhodes E. Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research 2 (1978) 429-444
10. Chen C.T., and Cheng H.L. A comprehensive model for selecting information system project under fuzzy environment. International Journal of Project Management (2008) 10.1016/j.ijproman.2008.04.001
11. Chen X., Skully M., and Brown K. Banking efficiency in China: Application of DEA to pre- and post-deregulation eras: 1993-2000. China Economic Review 16 (2005) 229-245
12. Cooper W.W., Park K.S., and Yu G. IDEA and AR-IDEA: Models for dealing with imprecise data in DEA. Management Science 45 (1999) 597-607
13. Edirisinghe N.C.P., and Zhang X. Generalized DEA model of fundamental analysis and its application to portfolio optimization. Journal of Banking and Finance 31 (2007) 3311-3335
14. Eilat H., Golany B., and Shtub A. R&D project evaluation: An integrated DEA and balanced scorecard approach. Omega (2006) 10.1016/j.omega.2006.05.002
15. Emrouznejad A., Tavares G., and Parker B. A bibliography of data envelopment analysis (1978-2003). Socio-Economic Planning Sciences 38 (2007) 159-229
16. Ertay T., Ruan D., and Tuzkaya U.R. Integrating data envelopment analysis and analytic hierarchy for the facility layout design in manufacturing systems. Information Sciences 176 (2006) 237-262
17. Han C.H., Kim J.K., Choi S.H., and Kim S.H. Determination of information system development priority using quality function development. Computers and Industrial Engineering 35 (1998) 241-244
18. Hasan H., and Tibbits H. Strategic management of electronic commerce: An adaption of the balanced scorecard". Electronic Networking Applications and Policy 10 5 (2000)
19. Holtsnider B., and Jaffe D. IT manager's handbook: Getting your new job done. 2nd ed. (2007), Morgan Kaufmann Publishers
20. Ittner C., Larcker D., and Randall T. Performance implications of strategic performance measurement in financial services firms. Accounting, Organizations and Society 28 (2003) 715-741
21. Johnes J. Measuring teaching efficiency in higher education: An application of data envelopment analysis to economics graduates from UK Universities 1993. European Journal of Operational Research 174 (2006) 443-456
22. Kaplan R.S., and Norton D.P. The balanced scorecard: Measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review January-February (1992) 71-79
23. Kaplan R.S., and Norton D. The balanced scorecard - translating strategy into action (1996), Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA
24. Kaplan R.S., and Norton D. The strategy-focused organization (2001), Harvard Business School Press, Harvard
25. Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (2004). Organizational capital: Leadership, alignment, and teamwork. Balanced Scorecard Report. Article Reprint B0403A, March-April, 1-7.
26. Kengpol A., and Tuominen M. A framework for group decision support systems: An application in the evaluation of information technology for logistics firms. International Journal of Production Economics 101 (2006) 159-171
27. Keyes J. Implementing the it balanced scorecard, aligning IT with corporate strategy (2005), Auerbach Publications Taylor and Francis Group
28. Kim S.H., Park C.G., and Park K.S. An application of data envelopment analysis in telephone offices evaluation with partial data. Computers and Operations Research 26 (1999) 59-72
29. Lee J.W., and Kim S.H. An integrated approach for interdependent information system project selection. International Journal of Project Management 19 (2001) 111-118
30. Liu F.H.F., and Hai H.L. The voting analytic hierarchy process method for selecting supplier. International Journal of Production Economics 97 (2005) 308-317
31. Liu S.T. A fuzzy DEA/AR approach to the selection of flexible manufacturing systems. Computers and Industrial Engineering 54 (2008) 66-76
32. Mahmudi, J., Nalchigar, S., & Ebrahimi, S. B. (2008). Selecting the most efficient information system project using data envelopment analysis: Case Study of Iran Ministry of Commerce. In Proceeding of 2008 international joint conference on e-Commerce, e-Administration, e-Society, and e-Education, March.
33. Maltz A., Shenhar A., and Reilly R. Beyond the balanced scorecard: Refining the search for organizational success measures. Long Range Planning 36 (2003) 187-204
34. Mannino M., Hong S.N., and Choi I.J. Efficiency evaluation of data warehouse operations. Decision Support Systems 44 (2008) 883-898
35. Marchewka J.T. Information technology project management, providing measurable organizational value (2003), John Wiley and Sons
36. Rickards R.C. BSC and benchmark development for an e-commerce SME. Benchmarking: An International Journal 14 (2007) 222-250
37. Ruiz-Mercader J., Merono-Cerdan A.L., and Sabater-Sanchez R. Information technology and learning: Their relationship and impact on organisational performance in small businesses. International Journal of Information Management 26 (2006) 16-29
38. Santhanam R., and Kyparisis J. A multiple criteria decision model for information system project selection. Computers and Operations Research 22 (1995) 807-816
39. Schniederjans M.J., and Santhanam R. A multi-objective constrained resource information system project selection method. European Journal of Operational Research 70 (1993) 244-253
40. Schniederjans M.J., and Wilson R.L. Using the analytic hierarchy process and goal programming for information system project selection. Information and Management 20 (1991) 333-342
41. Shafer S.M., and Byrd T.A. A framework for measuring the efficiency of organizational investments in information technology using data envelopment analysis. Omega 28 (2000) 125-141
42. Sowlati T., Paradi J.C., and Suld C. Information systems project prioritization using data envelopment analysis. Mathematical and Computer Modeling 41 (2005) 1279-1298
43. Toloo M., and Nalchigar S. A new integrated DEA model for finding most BCC-efficient DMU. Applied Mathematical Modelling (2008) 10.1016/j.apm.2008.02.001
44. Tseng S.M. The effects of information technology on knowledge management systems. Expert Systems with Applications 35 (2008) 150-160
45. Wang J.J., and Yang D.L. Using a hybrid multi-criteria decision aid method for information systems outsourcing. Computers and Operations Research 34 (2007) 3691-3700
46. Weber C.A., Current J.R., and Desai A. Non-cooperative negotiation strategies for vendor selection. European Journal of Operational Research 108 (1998) 208-223
47. Wen H.J., Lim B., and Huang H.L. Measuring e-commerce efficiency: A data envelopment analysis (DEA) approach. Industrial Management and Data Systems 103/9 (2003) 703-710
48. Wong-On-Wing B., Guo L., Li W., and Yang D. Reducing conflict in balanced scorecard evaluations. Accounting, Organizations and Society 32 (2007) 363-377
49. Zhu J. Imprecise data envelopment analysis (IDEA): A review and improvement with an application. European Journal of Operational Research 144 (2003) 513-529