Beyond the balanced scorecard: Refining the search for organizational success measures

Long Range Planning

Volumn 36, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 187-204

  Maltz, Alan C ^a   Shenhar, Aaron J ^a   Reilly, Richard R ^a  

^a STEVENS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FINANCE; MANAGEMENT; MANAGERS;

COMMERCIAL FIRMS;

STRATEGIC PLANNING;

CORPORATE STRATEGY; INDUSTRIAL PERFORMANCE; ORGANIZATIONAL FRAMEWORK; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT;

EID: 0037398254     PISSN: 00246301     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0024-6301(02)00165-6     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. R. Hayes and W. Abernathy, Managing our way to economic decline. Harvard Business Review 58, 67-77 (1980).
2. C. K. Brancato, New Corporate Performance Measures in The Conference Board, NewYork (1995).
3. G. Hamel and C. K. Prahalad, Competing for the Future in Harvard Business School Press, Boston (1994).
4. G. B. Murphy, J. W. Trailer and R. C. Hill, Measuring performance in entrepreneurship research, Journal of Business Research. 36, 15-23 (1996).
5. B. S. Chakravarthy, Measuring strategic performance, Strategic Management Journal, 7, 437-458 (1986);
6. T. J. Peters and R. Waterman, In Search of Excellence in Harper and Row, New York (1982).
7. R. S. Kaplan and D. P. Norton. The balanced scorecard-Measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review Jan.-Feb. (1982);
8. R. S. Kaplan and D. P. Norton. Putting the balanced scorecard to work. Harvard Business Review Sept.-Oct. (1993);
9. R. S. Kaplan and D. P. Norton The Balanced Scorecard, Harvard Business School Press, Boston (1996).
10. A. J. Shenhar and D. Dvir. Long term success dimensions in technology-based organizations. (chapter 32). Handbook of Technology Management. McGraw Hill, New York (1996).
11. R. S. Kaplan and D. P. Norton, The Strategy-Focused Organization: How Balanced Scorecard Companies Thrive in the New Business Environment in Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA (2000).
12. See also D. Dvir, E. Segev and A. Shenhar. Technology's varying impact on the success of strategic business units within the Miles and Snow typology. Strategic Management Journal 14 (1993).
13. A. A. Atkinson, J. H. Waterhouse and R. B. Wells. A stakeholder approach to strategic performance measurement. Sloan Management Review: 25-37 (1997).
14. M. Smith. Measuring organizational effectiveness. Management Accounting 34-36 (1998).
15. L. Strecker. Balanced scorecard at Best Foods. Presented at the SATM Roundtable. Hoboken, NJ (1999).
16. J. E. Delery and D. H. Doty, Modes of theorizing in strategic human resource Management: tests of universalistic, contingency, and configurational performance predictions, Academy of Management Journal 39, 802-835 (1996);
17. M. A. Huselid, The impact of human resource management practices on turnover, productivity, and corporate financial performance, Academy of Management Journal 38, 636-672 (1995);
18. S. L. Berman, A. C. Wicks, S. Kotha and T. M. Jones, Does stakeholder orientation matter? The relationship between stakeholder management models and firm financial performance, Academy of Management Journal 42, 488-506 (1999).
19. M. A. Youndt, S. A. Snell, J. W. Dean and D. P. Lepak, Human resource management, manufacturing strategy, and firm performance. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 836-866 (1996).
20. A. C. Maltz, Defining and Measuring Organizational Success: A Multidimensional Model, PhD Dissertation. Stevens Institute of Technology, Hoboken, NJ (2000).
21. References in this paragraph can be found at J. L. Stimpert and I. M. Duhaime. Seeing the big picture: The influence of industry, diversification, and business strategy on performance. Academy of Management Journal 40, 560-583 (1997);
22. S. A. Zahra. Technology strategy and financial performance: Examining themoderating role of the firm's competitive environment. Journal of Business Venturing 11, 189-219 (1996);
23. D. J. Ketchen, J. B. Thomas and C. C. Snow. Organizational configurations and performance: A comparison of theoretical approaches. Academy of Management Journal 1278-1313 (1993);
24. A. Gupta and V. Govindarajan. Business unit strategy, managerial characteristics, and business unit effectiveness at strategy implementation. Academy of Management Journal 27, 25-41 (1984);
25. D. Miller and P. Friesen. Strategy-making and environment: The third link. Strategic Management Journal 4, 221-235 (1983);
26. D. Miller. Relating Porter's business strategies to environment and structure: Analysis and performance implications. Academy of Management Journal 31, 280-308 (1988);
27. P. P. McDougall, J. G. Covin, R. B. Robinson and L. Herron. The effects of industry growth and strategic breadth on new venture performance and strategy content. Strategic Management Journal 15, 537-554 (1994);
28. T. C. Powell. Untangling the relationship between strategic planning and performance: The role of contingency factors. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences 11, 124-139 (1994);
29. T. C. Powell. How much does industry matter? An alternative empirical test. Strategic Management Journal 17, 323-334 (1996).
30. References in this paragraph can be found at Huselid (1995) (see Ref 13 above); J. B. Arthur. Effects of human resource systems on manufacturing performance and turnover. Academy of Management Journal 37, 670-687 (1994);
31. J. Pfeffer. Competitive Advantage Through People. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA (1994);
32. J. P. MacDuffie. Human resource bundles and manufacturing performance: Organizational logic and flexible production systems in the world auto industry. Industrial and Labor Relations Review 48, 197-221 (1995).
33. R. M. Kanter, Collaborative advantage: the art of alliances. Harvard Business Review, July-August 96-108 (1994).
34. B. R. Agle, R. K. Mitchell and J. A. Sonnenfeld. Who matters to CEOs? An investigation of stakeholder attributes and salience, corporate performance, and CEO values. Academy of Management Journal 507-525 (1999);
35. T. L. Simons. Top management team consensus, heterogeneity, and debate as contingent predictors of company performance: The complementarity of group structure and process. Academy of Management Best Paper Proceedings, 62-66 (1995);
36. T. L. Simons, L. H. Pelled and K. A. Smith. Making use of difference: Diversity, debate and decision comprehesiveness in top management teams. Academy of Management Journal 662-673 (1999).
37. A. Griffin and A. L. Page, An interim report on measuring product development success and failure, Journal of Product Innovation Management 10, 291-308 (1993).
38. P. F. Drucker, Management: Tasks in Harper Row, Responsibilities, Practices. New York (1973).
39. D. T. Otley, The contingency theory of management accounting: Achievement and prognosis, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 5, 413-428 (1980).
40. K. E. Sveiby, The New Organizational Wealth in Berret-Koehler, San Francisco, CA (1997).
41. S. Parsley, How to evaluate the performance of a cooperative. Management Quarterly 33, 31-35 (1992).
42. R. M. Steers, When is an organization effective?-A process approach to understanding effectiveness. Organizational Dynamics 5, 50-63 (1976).
43. J. C. Collins and J. I. Porras, Built to Last. Harper Collins, New York (1994).
44. A. Griffin and A. L. Page, PDMA success measurement project: Recommended measures for product development success and failure, Journal of Product Innovation Management 13, 478-496 (1996).
45. S. Globerson and E. Darom. Comparison of three techniques for weighing importance of performance indicators. 1982 Fall Industrial Engineering Conference Proceedings. Cincinnati (1982).
46. D. Dvir and A. Shenhar, Success factors of high-technology SBUs: Towards a conceptual model based on the Israeli electronics and computers industry. Journal of Product Innovation Management 7, 288-296 (1990).
47. D. Dvir and A. J. Shenhar, Measuring the success of technology-based strategic businessunits, Engineering Management Journal 4, 33-38 (1992).