Design and the management of multi-institutional research collaborations: Theoretical implications from two case studies

Research Policy

Volumn 35, Issue 7, 2006, Pages 975-993

  Corley, Elizabeth A ^a   Boardman, P Craig ^b   Bozeman, Barry ^b  

^a ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

Epistemic norms; Inter institutional collaboration; Interdisciplinary science collaboration; Organizational structure

Indexed keywords

INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PROJECT MANAGEMENT; SOCIETIES AND INSTITUTIONS; THEOREM PROVING;

EPISTEMIC NORMS; INTER-INSTITUTIONAL COLLABORATION; INTERDISCIPLINARY SCIENCE COLLABORATION; ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE;

RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT MANAGEMENT;

EID: 33747210408     PISSN: 00487333     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2006.05.003     Document Type: Article

References (71)

1. Adams J., Polson D.W., and Franks S. Prevalence of polycystic ovaries in women with anovulation and idiopathic hirsutism. British Medical Journal 293 (1986) 355-359
2. Aldrich H. Organizations and Environments (1979), Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ
3. Bauer H.H. Barriers against interdisciplinarity-implications for study of science, technology, and society (Sts). Science, Technology, and Human Values 15 1 (1990) 105-119
4. Beaver D.D., and Rosen R. Studies in scientific collaboration: Part Ii. Scientometrics 1 2 (1979) 133-149
5. Becher A. Academic Tribes and Territories: Intellectual Enquiry and Cultures of the Disciplines (1989), Society for Research Into Hugher Education and Open University Press, Milton Keynes, England
6. Becher T. Towards a definition of disciplinary cultures. Studies in Higher Education 6 2 (1981) 109-122
7. In: Bechtel W. (Ed). Integrating Scientific Disciplines: Case Studies from the Life Sciences (1986), Nijhoff, Dordrecht
8. Becker W., and Dietz J. R&D cooperation and innovation activities of firms-evidence for the German manufacturing industry. Research Policy 33 2 (2004) 209-223
9. Boardman P.C., and Bozeman B. Implementing a "bottom-up", "multi-sector research collaboration: the case of Texas air quality collaboration". Economics of Innovation and New Technology 15 1 (2006) 51-69
10. Bozeman B., and Boardman C. Managing the New Multipurpose, Multidiscipline University Research Centers: Institutional Innovation in the Academic Community (2003), IBM Center for the Business of Government
11. Bozeman B., and Corley E. Scientists' collaboration strategies: implications for scientific and technical human capital. Research Policy 33 4 (2004) 599-616
12. Bozeman B., and Rogers J.D. A churn model of scientific knowledge value: internet researchers as a knowledge value collective. Research Policy 31 5 (2002) 769-794
13. Bozeman B., Youtie J., and Libaers D. Institutional Design and the Organization of Research: A Cross-Case Analysis of National Institutes of Health Research Centers (2005), Research Value Mapping Program, Georgia Tech, Atlanta, GA
14. Camagni R. Inter-firm industrial networks: the costs and benefits of cooperative behavior. Journal of Industry Studies 1 1 (1993) 1-15
15. Chompalov I., and Shrum W. Institutional collaboration in science: a typology of technological practice. Science Technology and Human Values 24 3 (1999) 338-372
16. Chompalov I., Genuth J., and Shrum W. The organization of scientific collaborations. Research Policy 31 5 (2002) 749-767
17. Clark B.R. The Higher Education System: Academic Organization in Cross-National Perspective (1983), University of California Press, Los Angeles
18. Clarke A.E. Disciplining Reproduction: Modernity, American Life Sciences, and the "Problems of Sex" (1998), University of California Press, Berkeley
19. Colino, S., 2004. No Longer a Mere Nuisance: As Incidence Rises with Obesity, Medical Community Begins to Take Pcos Seriously. Washington Post April 20. Final Edition ed., sec. Health.
20. Crane D. The Invisible College. (1972), University of Chicago Press, Chicago
21. Crow M., and Bozeman B. Limited by Design: R&D Laboratories in the U.S. National Innovation System (1998), Columbia University Press, New York
22. Edge D.O., and Mulkay M.J. Astronomy Transformed: The Emergence of Radio Astronomy in Britain (1976), Wiley-Interscience Press, New York
23. Etzkowitz H. The second academic revolution and the rise of entrepreneurial science. IEEE Technology and Society Magazine 20 (2001) 18-30
24. Etzkowitz H., and Leydesdorff L. The dynamics of innovation: from national systems and 'Mode 2' to a triple helix of university-industry-government relations. Research Policy 29 (2000) 823-833
25. Etzkowitz H., Webster A., Gebhardt C., and Terra B.R.C. The future of the university and the university of the future: evolution of ivory tower to entrepreneurial paradigm. Research Policy 29 2 (2000) 313-330
26. Farquhar C. History of polycystic ovary syndrome. In: Kovacs G.T. (Ed). Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome (2000), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
27. Fisher L.M. How strategic alliances work in biotech. Strategy and Business (1996)
28. Freeman J., and Hannan M.T. Niche width and the dynamics of organizational populations. American Journal of Sociology 88 6 (1983) 1116-1144
29. Gibbons M., Limoges C., Nowotny H., Schwartzman S., Scott P., and Trow M. The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies (1994), Sage, London
30. Goldman A. Epistemology and Cognition (1986), Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
31. Gulati R. Social structure and alliance formation patterns: a longitudinal analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly 40 4 (1995) 619-652
32. Hagedoorn J. Understanding the rationale of strategic technology partnering-inter-organizational modes of cooperation and sectoral differences. Strategic Management Journal 14 5 (1993) 371-385
33. Hagedoorn J., Link A.N., and Vonortas N.S. Research partnerships. Research Policy 29 4-5 (2000) 567-586
34. Hagstrom W. The Scientific Community (1965), Basic Books, New York
35. Hargens L.L., Mullins N.C., and Hecht P.. Research areas and stratification processes in science. Social Studies of Science 10 1 (1980) 55-74
36. Katz J.S., and Martin B.R. What is research collaboration?. Research Policy 26 1 (1997) 1-18
37. Katz M.L. An analysis of cooperative research and development. RAND Journal of Economics 17 (1986) 527-544
38. Kekale J. Conceptions of quality in four different disciplines. Tertiary Education and Management 8 (2002) 65-80
39. Knorr-Cetina K. Epistemic Cultures: How the Sciences Make Knowledge (1999), Harvard University Press, Cambridge
40. Kovacs, G., Burger, H.G., 2000. Introduction-Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome Is Not Just a Reproductive Problem. In: Kovacs, G.T. (Ed.).
41. Krige J. Some socio-historical aspects of multinational collaborations in high-energy physics at Cern between 1975 and 1985. In: Crawford E. (Ed). Denationalizing Science: The Contexts of International Scientific Practice (1993), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht 233-262
42. Landry R., and Amara N. The impact of transaction costs on the institutional structuration of collaborative academic research. Research Policy 27 (1998) 901-913
43. Lee S., and Bozeman B. The effects of scientific collaboration on productivity. Social Studies of Science 35 5 (2005) 673-702
44. In: Lemaine G., Macleod R., Mulkay M., and Weingart P. (Eds). Perspectives on the Emergence of Scientific Disciplines (1976), The Hague, Mouton
45. Lenoir T. Instituting Science: The Cultural Production of Scientific Disciplines (1997), Stanford University Press, California
46. Leydesdorff L., and Etzkowitz H. Emergence of a triple helix of university-industry-government relations. Science and Public Policy 23 (1996) 279-286
47. Leydesdorff L., and Etzkowitz H. The triple helix as a model for innovation studies. Science and Public Policy 25 3 (1998) 195-203
48. Link A.N. Strategies for cooperation in R&D. In: Khalil T., and Bayraktar B. (Eds). Management of Technology (1990), Institute of Industrial Engineering, Miami
49. Link A.N., and Bauer L.L. An economic analysis of cooperative research. Technovation 6 (1987) 247-260
50. Link A.N., Teece D.J., and Finan W.F. Estimating the benefits from collaboration: the case of sematech. Review of Industrial Organization 11 5 (1996) 737-751
51. Lodahl J.B., and Gordon G. The structure of scientific fields and the functioning of university graduate departments. American Sociological Review 37 (1972) 57-72
52. Melin G. Pragmatism and self-organization-research collaboration on the individual level. Research Policy 29 1 (2000) 31-40
53. Meyer J.W., and Rowan B. Institutionalized organizations: formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology 83 2 (1977) 340-363
54. Mowery, D., 2001. The Changing Role of Universities in the 21st Century U.S. R&D System. Aaas Science and Technology Policy Yearbook.
55. Mowery D.C., Oxley J.E., and Silverman B.S. Technological overlap and interfirm cooperation: implications for the resource-based view of the firm. Research Policy 27 5 (1998) 507-523
56. Mullins N.C., Hargens L.L., Hecht P.K., and Kick E.L. Group structure of co-citation clusters: a comparative-study. American Sociological Review 42 4 (1977) 552-562
57. Polodny J.M., and Page K.L. Network forms of organization. Annual Review of Sociology 24 (1998) 57-76
58. Polson D.W., Adams J., Wadsworth J., and Franks S. Polycystic ovaries-a common finding in normal women. Lancet 1 (1988) 870-872
59. de Solla Price D.J., and Beaver D. Collaboration in an invisible college. American Psychologist 21 (1966) 1011-1018
60. Rogers J.D., and Bozeman B. Knowledge value alliances: an alternative to the R&D project focus in evaluation. Science Technology and Human Values 26 1 (2001) 23-55
61. Rosenberg N., and Nelson R.R. American universities and technical advance in industry. Research Policy 23 (1994) 248-323
62. Shrum W., Chompalov I., and Genuth J. Trust, Conflict and Performance in Scientific. Social Studies of Science (Sage) vol. 31 (2001), Sage Publications Ltd. p. 681
63. Sinha D.K., and Cusumano M.A. Complementary resources and cooperative research: a model of research joint ventures among competitors. Management Science 37 9 (1991) 1091-1106
64. Snow C.P. The Two Cultures: And a Second Look: An Expanded Version of the Two Cultures and the Scientific Revolution (1964), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
65. Stein I.F., and Leventhal M.L. Amenorrhea associated with bilateral polycystic ovaries. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 29 (1935) 181-186
66. The Rotterdam ESHRE/ASRM-Sponsored PCOS Consensus Workshop Group. Revised 2003 consensus on diagnostic criteria and long-term health risks related to polycystic ovarian syndrome. Fertility and Sterility 81 1 (2004) 19-25
67. Turner J.L., Miller M., and Mitchell-Kernan C. Disciplinary cultures and graduate education. Emergences 12 1 (2002) 47-70
68. van Gigch J.P. Comparing the epistemologies of scientific discipline in two distinct domains: modern physics versus social sciences. Part Ii. Epistemology and knowledge characteristics of the 'New' social sciences. Systems Research and Behavioral Science 19 (2002) 551-562
69. van Gigch J.P. Comparing the epistemologies of scientific discipline in two distinct domains: modern physics versus social sciences. Part I. The epistemology and knowledge characteristics of the physical sciences. Systems Research and Behavioral Science 19 (2002) 199-209
70. Whitmeyer J.M. Effects of positive reputation systems. Social Science Research 29 (2000) 188-207
71. Youtie, J., Libaers, D., Bozeman, B., 2006. Institutionalization of university research centers: the case of the national cooperative program in infertility research program. Technovation, forthcoming.