Internet usage purposes and gender differences in the effects of perceived utilitarian and hedonic value

Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking

Volumn 13, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 179-183

  Wang, Edward Shih Tse ^a  

^a NATIONAL CHUNG HSING UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; FACTORIAL ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERNET; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; MALE; MOTIVATION; PERCEPTION; SEX DIFFERENCE;

COMMUNICATION; FACTOR ANALYSIS, STATISTICAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERNET; MALE; MOTIVATION; PERCEPTION; SEX FACTORS;

EID: 77951102022     PISSN: 21522715     EISSN: 21522723     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/cyber.2009.0200     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Attaran M, Attaran S. Collaborative computing technology: the hot new managing tool. Journal of Management Development 2002; 21:598-609.
2. Black IR, Efron A, Ioannou C, et al. Designing and implementing Internet questionnaires using Microsoft excel. Australasian Marketing Journal 2005; 13:61-72.
3. Pratten J, Scoffield S. The role of the Internet in the marketing of independent public houses in the UK. Service Industries Journal 2007; 27:125-137
4. Jepsen AL. Factors affecting consumer use of the Internet for information search, Journal of Interactive Marketing 2007; 21:21-34.
5. Goetzinger L, Park J, Lee YJ, et al. Value-driven consumer e-health information search behavior. International Journal of Pharmaceutical & Healthcare Marketing 2007; 1:128-142
6. Seock YK, Norton M. Attitude toward Internet Web sites, online information search, and channel choices for purchasing. Journal of Fashion Marketing & Management 2007; 11:571-586
7. Hui TK, Wan D. Factors affecting Internet shopping behaviour in Singapore: gender and educational issues. International Journal of Consumer Studies 2007; 31:310-316
8. Polonsky MJ, Hyman MR. A multiple stakeholder perspective on responsibility in advertising. Journal of Advertising 2007; 36:5-13.
9. Helgesen Ø. Targeting customers: a financial approach based on creditworthiness. Journal of Targeting, Measurement & Analysis for Marketing 2008; 16:261-273
10. Vaaland TI, Heide M, Grønhaug K. Corporate social responsibility: investigating theory and research in the marketing context. European Journal of Marketing 2008; 42:927-953
11. Gounaris SP, Tzempelikos NA, Chatzipanagiotou K. The relationships of customer-perceived value, satisfaction, loyalty and behavioral intentions. Journal of Relationship Marketing 2007; 6:63-87.
12. Woodruff RB. Customer value: the next source for competitive advantage. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 1997; 25:139-153
13. Smith JB, Colgate M. Customer value creation: a practical framework. Journal of Marketing Theory & Practice 2007; 15:7-23.
14. Okazaki, S. Exploring experiential value in online mobile gaming adoption. CyberPsychology & Behavior 2008; 11: 619-622
15. Teo TSH, Lim VKG, Lai RYC. Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in Internet usage. International Journal of Management Science 1999; 27:25-37.
16. Cheung W, Chang MK, Lai VS. Prediction of Internet and World Wide Web usage at work: a test of an extended Triandis model. Decision Support Systems 2000; 30:83-100.
17. Moon JW, Kim YG. Extending the TAM for a World Wide Web context. Information & Management 2001; 38:217-230
18. van der Heijden H. User acceptance of hedonic information systems. MIS Quarterly 2004; 28:695-704.
19. Parsons AG. Non-functional motives for online shoppers: why we click. Journal of Consumer Marketing 2002; 19: 380-392
20. Arnold MJ, Reynolds KE. Hedonic shopping motivations. Journal of Retailing 2003; 79:77-95.
21. Overby JW, Lee EJ. The effects of utilitarian and hedonic online shopping value on consumer preference and intentions. Journal of Business Research 2006; 59:1160-1166
22. Chiu HC, Hsieh YC, Kao YH, et al. The determinants of email receivers' disseminating behaviors on the Internet. Journal of Advertising Research 2007; 47:524-534
23. Garnier M. Search engine loyalty: considering the commitment-loyalty link from a hedonic versus utilitarian perspective. International Journal of Internet Marketing & Advertising 2009; 5:43-73.
24. Koo DM, Kim JJ, Lee SH. Personal values as underlying motives of shopping online. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing & Logistics 2008; 20:156-173
25. Hartman JB, Shim S, Barber B, et al. Adolescents' utilitarian and hedonic Web consumption behavior: hierarchical influence of personal values and innovativeness. Psychology & Marketing 2006; 23:813-839
26. Massey AP, Khatri V, Montoya-Weiss MM. Usability of online services: the role of technology readiness and context. Decision Sciences 2007; 38:277-358
27. Park CW, Moon BJ. The relationship between product involvement and product knowledge: moderating roles of product type and product knowledge type. Psychology & Marketing 2003; 20:977-997
28. Cottet P, Lichtlú MC, Plichon V. The role of value in services: a study in a retail environment. Journal of Consumer Marketing 2006; 23:219-227
29. Chiu HC, Hsieh YC, Li YC, et al. Relationship marketing and consumer switching behavior. Journal of Business Research 2005; 58:1681-1689
30. Jones MA, Reynolds KE, Arnold MJ. Hedonic and utilitarian shopping value: investigating differential effects on retail outcomes. Journal of Business Research 2006; 59: 974-981
31. Rintamäki T, Kanto A, Kuusela H, et al. Decomposing the value of department store shopping into utilitarian, hedonic and social dimensions: evidence from Finland. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management 2006; 34:6-25.
32. Dholakia RR. Gender and IT in the household: evolving patterns of Internet use in the United States. Information Society 2006; 22:231-240
33. Jackson LA, Yong Z, Kolenic III A, et al. Race, gender, and information technology use: the new digital divide. Cyber- Psychology & Behavior 2008; 11:437-442
34. Miyazaki AD, Lassar WM, Taylor KA. Hispanic vs non- Hispanic response to online self-service tasks: implications for perceived quality and patronage intentions. Journal of Services Marketing 2007; 21:520-529
35. Paridon TJ, Carraher S, Carraher SC. The income effect in personal shopping value, consumer self-confidence, and information sharing research. Academy of Marketing Studies Journal 2006; 10:107-124
36. Vijayasarathy LR. Product characteristics and Internet shopping intentions. Journal of Internet Research 2002; 12: 411-426
37. Cheng JMS, Wang EST, Lin JYC, et al. Taking the Internet as a retailing platform: a perceived value perspective. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing & Logistics 2009; 21:144-160
38. Dubelaar C, Leong M, Alpert F. Impact of interactivity on the stickiness of online gift stores. Journal of Asia Pacific Marketing 2003; 2:22-41.
39. Stoel L, Wickliffe V, Lee KH. Attribute beliefs and spending as antecedents to shopping value. Journal of Business Research 2004; 57:1067-1073