The oaks of western Eurasia: Traditional classifications and evidence from two nuclear markers

Taxon

Volumn 59, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 351-366

  Denk, Thomas ^a   Grimm, Guido W ^a  

^a SWEDISH MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Darwinian classification; Intrageneric evolution; Intraindividual variability; Phylogenetic networks; Quercus; rDNA spacers

Indexed keywords

CLUSTER ANALYSIS; DATA SET; DECIDUOUS TREE; DNA; ENDEMIC SPECIES; EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY; GENETIC MARKER; IDENTIFICATION METHOD; PHYLOGENETICS; RECONSTRUCTION; SPECIATION (BIOLOGY); TAXONOMY; VEGETATION CLASSIFICATION;

EURASIA; HIMALAYAS;

CYCLOBALANOPSIS; ILEX; LEPIDOBALANUS; QUERCUS; QUERCUS ALBA;

EID: 77950955268     PISSN: 00400262     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/tax.592002     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. Altschul, S.F., Gish, W., Miller, W., Myers, E.W. & Lipman, D.J. 1990. Basic local alignment search tool. J. Molec. Biol. 215: 403-410.
2. Arnheim, N., Krystal, M., Schmickel, R., Wilson, G., Ryder, O. & Zimmer, E. 1980. Molecular evidence for genetic exchanges among ribosomal genes on nonhomologous chromosomes in man and apes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 77: 7323-7327.
3. Browicz, K. 1982. Chorology of trees and shrubs in south-west Asia and adjacent regions, vol. 1. Warsaw, Poznań: Polish Scientific Publishers.
4. Bryant, D. & Moulton, V. 2002. NeighborNet: An agglomerative method for the construction of planar phylogenetic networks. Pp. 375-391 in: Guigó, R. & Gusfield, D. (eds.) Algorithms in bioinformatics: Second International Workshop, WABI 2002, Rome, Italy, September 17-21, 2002; Proceedings. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 2452. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer.
5. Bryant, D. & Moulton, V. 2004. Neighbor-Net: An agglomerative method for the construction of phylogenetic networks. Molec. Biol. Evol. 21: 255-265.
6. Camus, A. 1936-38. Les chênes: Monographie du genre Quercus, tome 1, Genre Quercus, sous-genre Cyclobalanopsis, sous-genre Euquercus (sections Cerris et Mesobalanus). Texte. Paris: Lechevalier.
7. Camus, A. 1938-39. Les chênes: Monographie du genre Quercus, tome 2, Genre Quercus, sous-genre Euquercus (sections Lepidobalanus et Macrobalanus). Texte. Paris: Lechevalier.
8. Camus, A. 1952-54. Les chênes: Monographie du genre Quercus, tome 3, Genre Quercus, sous-genre Euquercus (sections Protobalanus et Lobatae) et genre Lithocarpus. Texte. Paris: Lechevalier.
9. Comes, H.P. & Abbott, R.J. 2001. Molecular phylogeography, reticulation, and lineage sorting in Mediterranean Senecio sect. Senecio (Asteraceae). Evolution 55: 1943-1962.
10. Denduangboripant, J. & Cronk, Q.C.B. 2001. Evolution and alignment of the hypervariable arm 1 of Aeschynanthus (Gesneriaceae) ITS 2 nuclear ribosomal DNA. Molec. Phylog. Evol. 20: 163-172.
11. Denk, T. & Grimm, G.W. 2005. Phylogeny and biogeography of Zelkova (Ulmaceae sensu stricto) as inferred from leaf morphology, ITS sequence data and the fossil record. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 147: 129-157.
12. Denk, T. & Grimm, G.W. 2009. Significance of pollen characteristics for infrageneric classification and phylogeny in Quercus (Fagaceae). Int. J. Pl. Sci. 170: 926-940.
13. Denk, T., Grimm, G., Stögerer, K., Langer, M. & Hemleben, V. 2002. The evolutionary history of Fagus in western Eurasia: Evidence from genes, morphology and the fossil record. Pl. Syst. Evol. 232: 213-236.
14. Felsenstein, J. 2004. Inferring phylogenies. Sunderland, Massachusetts: Sinauer.
15. Gebhardt, C., Ritter, E., Debener, T., Schachtschabel, U., Walkemeier, B., Uhrig, B. & Salamini, F. 1989. RFLP analysis and linkage mapping in Solanum tuberosum. Theor. Appl. Genet. 78: 65-75.
16. Göker, M., García-Blázquez, G., Voglmayr, H., Tellería, M.T. & Martín, M.P. 2009. Molecular taxonomy of phytopathogenic fungi: A case study in Peronospora. PLoS ONE 4: e6319.
17. Göker, M. & Grimm, G.W. 2008. General functions to transform associate data to host data, and their use in phylogenetic inference from sequences with intra-individual variability. BMC Evol. Biol. 8: 86.
18. Grebenstein, B., Röser, M., Sauer, W. & Hemleben, V. 1998. Molecular phylogenetic relationshpis in Aveneae (Poaceae) species and other grasses as inferred from ITS1 and ITS2 sequences. Pl. Syst. Evol. 213: 233-250.
19. Grimm, G.W. 2003. Tracing the mode and speed of intrageneric evolution: A phylogenetic case study of genus Acer L. and genus Fagus L. using fossil, morphological, and molecular data. Dissertation, Eberhard Karls University, Tübingen. Available at http://tobias-lib.uni-tuebingen.de/volltexte/2005/1574/index.html.
20. Grimm, G.W. & Denk, T. 2008. ITS evolution in Platanus: Homoeologues, pseudogenes, and ancient hybridization. Ann. Bot. 101: 403-419.
21. Grimm, G.W., Denk, T. & Hemleben, V. 2007a. Evolutionary history and systematic of Acer section Acer: A case study of low-level phylogenetics. Pl. Syst. Evol. 267: 215-253.
22. Grimm, G.W., Denk, T. & Hemleben, V. 2007b. Coding of intraspecific nucleotide polymorphisms: A tool to resolve reticulate evolutionary relationships in the ITS of beech trees (Fagus L., Fagaceae). Syst. Biodiv. 5: 291-309.
23. Haeckel, E. 1866. Generelle Morphologie der Organismen. Berlin: Reiner.
24. Heer, O. 1869. Flora fossilis Alaskana. Kongl. Svenska Vetensk.-Akad. Handl. 8 (4): 1-41, pl. 1-10.
25. Hörandl, E. 2006. Paraphyletic versus monophyletic taxa: Evolutionary versus cladistic classifications. Taxon 55: 564-570.
26. Hörandl, E. 2007. Neglecting evolution is bad taxonomy. Taxon 56: 1-5.
27. Iljinskaja, I.A. 1982. Fagaceae. Pp. 60-120 in: Takhtajan, A. (ed.), Magnoliophyta fossilia URSS, vol. 2, Ulmaceae-Betulaceae. Leningrad: Nauka.
28. IOPI (International Organization for Plant Information). 1996-.Provisional global plant checklist. http://www.bgbm.org/iopi/gpc/default.asp.
29. Jackson, R.B., Moores, L.A., Hoffmann, W.A., Pockman, W.T., Linder, C.R. 1999. Ecosystem rooting depth determined with caves and DNA. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 96: 11387-11392.
30. Jobst, J., King, K. & Hemleben, V. 1998. Molecular evolution of the internal transcribed spacers (ITS1 and ITS2) and phylogenetic relationships among species of Cucurbitaceae. Molec. Phylog. Evol. 9: 204-219.
31. Joly, S. & Bruneau, A. 2006. Incorporating allelic variation for reconstructing the evolutionary history of organisms from multiple genes: An example from Rosa in North America. Syst. Biol. 55: 623-636.
32. Kvaček, Z., Velitzelos, E. & Velitzelos, D. 2002. Late Miocene flora of Vegora, Macedonia, N. Greece. Athens: Korali Publications.
33. Leng, Q. 2000. Fagaceae from the Miocene Daotaiqiao Formation of Huanan, Heilongjiang, China. Acta Palaeontol. Sin. 39 (Suppl.): 251-287.
34. Mai, H.D. 1995. Tertiäre Vegetationsgeschichte Europas. Jena: Fischer.
35. Manchester, S.R. 1994. Fruits and seeds of the Middle Eocene Nut Beds Flora, Clarno Formation, Oregon. Palaeontogr. Amer. 58: 1-205.
36. Manen, J.-F. 2004. Are both sympatric species Ilex perado and Ilex canariensis secretly hybridizing? Indication from nuclear markers collected in Tenerife. BMC Evol. Biol. 4: 46.
37. Manos, P.S., Cannon, C.H. & Oh, S.-H. 2008. Phylogenetic relationships and taxonomic status of the paleoendemic Fagaceae of western North America: Recognition of a new genus, Notholithocarpus. Madroño 55: 181-190
38. Manos, P.S., Doyle, J.J. & Nixon, K.C. 1999. Phylogeny, biogeography and processes of molecular differentiation in Quercus subgenus Quercus (Fagaceae). Molec. Phylog. Evol. 12: 333-349.
39. Manos, P.S. & Stanford, A.M. 2001. The historical biogeography of Fagaceae: Tracking the tertiary history of temperate and subtropical forests of the Northern Hemisphere. Int. J. Pl. Sci. 162: S77-S93.
40. Manos, P.S., Zhou, Z.-K. & Cannon, C.H. 2001. Systematics of Fagaceae: Phylogenetic test of reproductive trait evolution. Int. J. Pl. Sci. 162: 1361-1379.
41. Mayol, M. & Rosselló, J.A. 2001. Why nuclear ribosomal DNA spacers (ITS) tell different stories in Quercus. Molec. Phylog. Evol. 19: 167-176.
42. Mayr, E. & Bock, W.J. 2002. Classifications and other ordering systems. J. Zool. Syst. Evol. Res. 40: 169-194.
43. Menickij, Ju. L. 1984. Duby Asii. Leningrad: Nauka.
44. Nixon, K.C. 1993. Infrageneric classification of Quercus (Fagaceae) and typification of sectional names. Ann. Sci. Forest. 50 (Suppl. 1): 25s-34s.
45. Nixon, K.C. 1997. Quercus. Pp. 445-506 in: Flora of North America Editorial Committee (eds.), Flora of North America north of Mexico, vol. 3. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.
46. Oh, S.-H. & Manos, P.S. 2008. Molecular phylogenetics and cupule evolution in Fagaceae as inferred from nuclear CRABS CLAW sequences. Taxon 57: 434-451.
47. Okuyama, Y., Fujii, N., Wakabayashi, M., Kawakita, A., Ito, M., Watanabe, M., Murakami, N. & Kato, M. 2005. Nonuniform concerted evolution and chloroplast capture: Heterogeneity of observed introgression patterns in three molecular data partition phylogenies of Asian Mitella (Saxifragaceae). Molec. Biol. Evol. 22: 285-296.
48. Ørsted, A.S. 1871. Bidrag til kundskab om Egefamilien. Kongel. Danske Vidensk. Selsk. Skr., Ser. 5, Naturvidensk. Math. Afd. 9: 331-538.
49. Ritz, C.M., Schmuths, H. & Wissemann, V. 2005. Evolution by reticulation: European dogroses originated by multiple hybridization across the genus Rosa. J. Heredity 96: 4-14.
50. Rosselló, J.A., Lázaro, A., Cosín, R. & Molins, A. 2007. A phylogeographic split in Buxus balearica (Buxaceae) as evidenced by nuclear ribosomal markers: When ITS paralogues are welcome. J. Molec. Evol. 64: 143-157.
51. Samuel, R., Bachmair, A., Jobst, J. & Ehrendorfer, F. 1998. ITS sequences from nuclear rDNA suggest unexpected phylogenetic relationships between Euro-Mediterranean, East Asiatic and North American taxa of Quercus (Fagaceae). Pl. Syst. Evol. 211: 129-139.
52. Schwarz, O. 1936. Entwurf zu einem natürlichen System der Cupuliferen und der Gattung Quercus L. Notizbl. Bot. Gart. Berlin-Dahlem 13 (116): 1-22.
53. Schwarz, O. 1936-39. Monographie der Eichen Europas und des Mittelmeergebietes. Repertorium Specierum Novarum Regni Vegetabilis, Sonderbeiheft D. Dahlem bei Berlin: Selbstverlag [Verlag des Repertoriums].
54. Schwarz, O. 1993. Quercus L. Pp. 72-76 in: Tutin, T.G., Burges, N.A.,Chater, A.O., Edmondson, J.R., Heywood, V.H., Moore, D.M., Valentine, D.H., Walters, S.M. & Webb, D.A. (eds.), Flora europaea, vol. 1, Psilotaceae to Platanaceae. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.
55. Smit, A. 1973. A scanning electron microscopical study of the pollen morphology in the genus Quercus. Acta Bot. Neerl. 22: 655-665.
56. Solomon, A.M. 1983a. Pollen morphology and plant taxonomy of white oaks in eastern North America. Amer. J. Bot. 70: 481-494.
57. Solomon, A.M. 1983b. Pollen morphology and plant taxonomy of red oaks in eastern North America. Amer. J. Bot. 70: 495-507.
58. Stamatakis, A. 2006a. RAxML-VI-HPC: Maximum-likelihood-based phylogenetic analyses with thousands of taxa and mixed models. Bioinformatics 22: 2688-2690.
59. Stamatakis, A. 2006b. Phylogenetic models of rate heterogeneity: A high performance computing perspective. In: Proceedings of 20th IEEE/ACM International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium (IPDPS2006), High Performance Computational Biology Workshop. Rhodos, Greece, April 2006. CD-ROM. Heraklion: Institute of Computer Science.
60. Stamatakis, A., Hoover, P. & Rougemont, J. 2008. A rapid bootstrap algorithm for the RAxML web-servers. Syst. Biol. 57: 758-771.
61. Swofford, DL. 2002. PAUP*: Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods). Champaign, Ilinois: National Illinois History Survey.
62. Tanai, T. 1995. Fagaceous leaves from the Paleogene of Hokkaido, Japan. Bull. Natl. Sci. Mus. Tokyo, C, Geol. Paleontol. 21: 71-101.
63. Tanai, T. & Uemura, K. 1994. Lobed oak leaves from the Tertiary of East Asia with reference to the oak phytogeography of the Northern Hemisphere. Trans. & Proc. Palaeontol. Soc. Japan, n.s., 173: 343-365.
64. Volkov, R.A., Zanke, C., Panchuk, I. & Hemleben, V. 2001. Molecular evolution of 5S rDNA of Solanum species (sect. Petota): Application for molecular phylogeny and breeding. Theor. Appl. Genet. 103: 1273-1282.
65. Walther, H. & Zastawniak, E. 1991. Fagaceae from Sośnica and Malczyce (near Wrocław, Poland): A revision of original material by Goeppert 1852 and 1855 and a study of new collections. Acta Palaeobot. 31: 153-199.
66. Wissemann, V. 2003. Hybridization and the evolution of the nrITS spacer region. Pp. 57-71 in: Sharma, A.K. & Sharma, A. (eds), Plant genome: Biodiversity and evolution, vol. 1, part A, Phanerogams. Enfield (U.S.A.), Plymouth (U.K.): Science Publishers.
67. Zander, R.H. 2008. Evolutionary inferences from non-monophyly on molecular trees. Taxon 57: 1182-1188.