Evolutionary inferences from non-monophyly on molecular trees

Taxon

Volumn 57, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 1182-1188

  Zander, Richard H ^a  

^a MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN   (United States)

Author keywords

Evolution; Macroevolution; Molecular systematics; Morphology; Pottiaceae; Taxon tree; Virtual fossil

Indexed keywords

BRYOPHYTE; CONVERGENCE; DIVERGENCE; DNA; EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY; FOSSIL RECORD; MORPHOLOGY; PHYLOGENETICS; TAXONOMY;

BRYOPHYTA; CACTACEAE; POTTIACEAE;

EID: 57749209988     PISSN: 00400262     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/tax.574011     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Alexander, P.J. 2006. Descent and modification in evolutionary systematics. Taxon 55: 4.
2. Bachmann, K. 2001. Evolution and the genetic analysis of populations: 1950-2000. Taxon 50: 7-45.
3. Benavides, E., Baum, R., McClellan, D. & Sites, J.W., Jr. 2007. Molecular phylogenetics of the lizard genus Microlophus (Squamata: Tropiduridae), aligning and retrieving indel signal from nuclear introns. Syst. Biol. 56: 776-797.
4. Bessey, C.E. 1915. The phylogenetic taxonomy of flowering plants. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 2: 109-233.
5. Brummitt, R.K. 2003. Further dogged defense of paraphyletic taxa. Taxon 52: 803-804.
6. Brummitt, R.K. 2006. Am I a bony fish? Taxon 55: 268-269.
7. Caporale, L.H. 1999. Chance favors the prepared genome. Ann. New York Acad. Sci. 870: 1-21.
8. Caporale, L.H. 2003. Natural selection and the emergence of a mutation phenotype: an update of the evolutionary synthesis considering mechanisms that affect genome variation. Ann. Rev. Microbiol. 57: 467-485.
9. Deméré, T.A., McGowen, M.R., Berta, A. & Gatesy, J. 2008. Morphological and molecular evidence for a stepwise evolutionary transition from teeth to baleen in mysticete whales. Syst. Biol. 57: 15-37.
10. Driscoll, C.A., Menotti-Raymond, M., Roca, A.L., Hupe, K., Johnson, W.E., Geffen, E., Harley, E., Delibes, M., Pontier, D., Kitchener, A.C., Yamaguchi, N., O'Brien, S.J. & Macdonald, D. 2007. The Near Eastern origin of cat domestication. Science 317: 519-523.
11. Elmer, K.R., Davila, J.A. & Lougheed, S.C. 2007. Cryptic diversity and deep divergence in an upper Amazonian frog, Eleutherodactylus ockendeni. BMC Evol. Biol. 7: 247. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-7-247.
12. Farjon, A. 2007. In defence of a conifer taxonomy which recognises evolution. Taxon 56: 639-641.
13. Gould, S.J. & Eldredge, N. 1993. Punctuated equilibrium comes of age. Nature 366: 223-227.
14. Gould, S.J. & Lewontin, R.C. 1979. The spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian paradigm: a critique of the adaptationist programme. Proc. Roy. Soc. London, Ser. B, Biol. Sci. 205: 581-598.
15. Grant, V. 1971. Plant Speciation. Columbia University Press, New York.
16. Guillaumet, A., Crochet, P.-A. & Pons, J.-M. 2007. Climatedriven diversification in two widespread Galerida larks. BMC Evol. Biol. 8: 32. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-8-32.
17. Hall, B.K. 2003. Descent with modification: the unity underlying homology and homoplasy as seen through an analysis of development and evolution. Biol. Rev. 78: 409-433.
18. Hebert, P.D.N. & Gregory, T. 2005. The promise of DNA barcoding for taxonomy. Syst. Biol. 54: 842.
19. Hebert, P.D.N., Penton, E.H., Burns, J.M., Janzen, D.H. & Hallwachs, W. 2004. Ten species in one: DNA barecoding reveals cryptic species in the neotropical skipper butterfly Astraptes fulgerator. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 101: 14812-14817.
20. Hedenäs, L. 2008. Molecular variation and speciation in Antitrichia curtipendula s.l. (Leucodontaceae, Bryophyta). Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 156: 341-354.
21. Hedenäs, L. & Eldenäs, P. 2007. Cryptic speciation, habitat diffeentiation, and geography in Hamatocaulis vernicosus (Calliergonaceae, Bryophyta). Pl. Syst. Evol. 268: 131-145.
22. Hörandl, E. 2006. Paraphyletic versus monophyletic taxa - evolutionary versus cladistic classifications. Taxon 55: 564-570.
23. Hörandl, E. 2007. Neglecting evolution is bad taxonomy. Taxon 56: 1-5.
24. Kårehed, J. & Bremer, B. 2007. The systematics of Knoxieae (Rubiaceae) - molecular data and their taxonomic consequences. Taxon 56: 1051-1076.
25. Kress, W.J., Wurdack, K.J., Zimmer, E.A., Weigt, L.A. & Janzen, D.H. 2005. Use of DNA barcodes to identify flowering plants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 102: 8369-8374.
26. Lee, M.S.Y. 2006. Morphological phylogenetics and the universe of useful characters. Taxon 55: 5-7.
27. Le Rouzic, A. & Carlborg, Ö. 2007. Evolutionary potential of hidden genetic variation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 23: 33-37.
28. Leschen, R.A.B., Buckley, T.R., Harman, H.M. & Shulmeister, J. 2008. Determining the origin and age of the Westland beech (Nothofagus) gap, New Zealand, using fungus beetle genetics. Molec. Ecol. 17: 1256-1276.
29. Levin, D.A. 2001. 50 years of plant speciation. Taxon 50: 69-91.
30. Lewis, H. 1962. Catastrophic selection as a factor in speciation. Evolution 16: 257-271.
31. Lewis, H. 1966. Speciation in flowering plants. Science 3152: 167-172.
32. Lewis, H. & Roberts, M.R. 1956. The origin of Clarkia lingulata. Evolution 10: 126-138.
33. Mort, M.E., Randle, C.P., Kimball, R.T., Tadesse, M. & Crawford, D.J. 2008. Phylogeny of Coreopsideae (Asteraceae) inferred from nuclear and plastid DNA sequences. Taxon 57: 109-120.
34. Newmaster, S.G, Fazekas, A.J. & Ragupathy, S. 2006. DNA barcoding in land plants: evaluation of rbcL in a multigene tiered approach. Canad. J. Bot. 84: 335-341.
35. Nordal, I. & Stedje, B. 2005. Paraphyletic taxa should be accepted. Taxon 54: 5-6.
36. Pelser, P.B., Nordenstam, B., Kadereit, J.W. & Watson, L.E. 2007. An ITS phylogeny of tribe Senecioneae (Asteraceae) and a new delimitation of Senecio L. Taxon 56: 1077-1104.
37. Schuettpeltz, E. & Pryer, K.M. 2007. Fern phylogeny inferred from 400 leptosporangiate species and three plastid genes. Taxon 56: 1037-1050.
38. Shaw, J. 2001. Biogeographic patterns and cryptic speciation in bryophytes. J. Biogeogr. 28: 253-261.
39. Shen, B., Dong, L., Xiao, S., & Kowalewski, M. 2008. The Avalon explosion: evolution of Ediacara morphospace. Science 319: 81-84.
40. Sosef, M.S.M. 1997. Hierarchical models, reticulate evolution and the inevitability of paraphyletic supraspecific taxa. Taxon 46: 75-85.
41. Theriot, E. 1992. Clusters, species concept, and morphological evolution of diatoms. Syst. Biol. 41: 141-157.
42. Vasek, F.C. 1968. The relationships of two ecologically marginal. sympatric Clarkia populations. Amer. Naturalist 102: 25-40.
43. Werner, O., Ros, R.M., Cano, M.J. & Guerra, J. 2004. Molecular phylogeny of Pottiaceae (Musci) based on chloroplast rps4 sequence data. Pl. Syst. Evol. 243: 147-164.
44. Werner, O., Ros, R.M. & Grundmann, M. 2005. Molecular phylogeny of Trichostomoideae (Pottiaceae, Bryophyta) based on nrITS sequence data. Taxon 54: 361-368.
45. Zander, R.H. 2007a. Nine easy steps for constructing reliable trees from published phylogenetic analyses. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 94: 691-709.
46. Zander, R.H. 2007b. Paraphyly and the species concept, a reply to Ebach & al. Taxon 56: 642-644.
47. Zander, R.H. 2007c. When biodiversity study and systematics diverge. Biodiversity 8: 43-48.
48. Zander, R.H. 2007d. The Pottiaceae s. str. as an evolutionary Lazarus taxon. J. Hattori Bot. Lab. 100: 581-602.
49. Zander, R.H. 2008. Statistical evaluation of the clade "Rhabdoweisiaceae." Bryologist 111: 292-301.