Molecular phylogenetics and cupule evolution in Fagaceae as inferred from nuclear CRABS CLAW sequences

Taxon

Volumn 57, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 434-451

  Oh, Sang Hun ^a,b   Manos, Paul S ^a  

^a DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Department of Obstetrics Gynecology   (United States)

Author keywords

CRABS CLAW; Cupule evolution; Fagaceae; Phylogeny

Indexed keywords

EVOLUTION; LEGUME; MOLECULAR ANALYSIS; MORPHOLOGY; PHYLOGENY;

CHRYSOLEPIS; FAGACEAE; FAGALES; LITHOCARPUS; LITHOCARPUS DENSIFLORUS; QUERCUS;

EID: 46449131776     PISSN: 00400262     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (104)

1. Abbe, E.C. 1974. Flowers and inflorescences of the "Amentiferae". Bot. Rev. 40: 159-261.
2. Alvarez, J. & Smyth, D.R. 1999. CRABS CLAW and SPATULA, two Arabidopsis genes that control carpel development in parallel with AGAMOUS. Development 126: 2377-2386.
3. Bailey, C.D. & Doyle, J.J. 1999. Potential phylogenetic utility of the low-copy nuclear gene pistillata in dicotyledonous plants: comparison of nrDNA ITS and trnL in Sphaerocardamum and other Brassicaceae. Molec. Phylog. Evol. 13: 20-30.
4. Barnett, E.C. 1944. Keys to the species groups of Quercus, Lithocarpus and Castanopsis of eastern Asia with notes on their distribution. Trans. & Proc. Bot. Soc. Edinburgh 34: 159-204.
5. Bellarosa, R., Simeone, M.C., Papini, A. & Schirone, B. 2005. Utility of ITS sequence data for phylogenetic reconstruction of Italian Quercus spp. Molec. Phylog. Evol. 34: 355-370.
6. Berridge, E.M. 1914. The structure of the flower of Fagaceae and its bearing on the affinities of the group. Ann. Bot. (London) 28: 509-526.
7. Bortiri, E., Oh, S., Gao, F. & Potter, D. 2002. The phylogenetic utility of nucleotide sequences of sorbitol 6-phosphate dehydrogenase in Prunus (Rosaceae). Amer. J. Bot. 89: 1697-1708.
8. Bowman, J.L. & Smyth, D.R. 1999. CRABS CLAW, a gene that regulates carpel and nectary development in Arabidopsis, encodes a novel protein with zinc finger and helix-loop-helix domains. Development 126: 2387-2396.
9. Brett, D.W. 1964. The inflorescence of Fagus and Castanea and the evolution of the cupules of the Fagaceae. New Phytol. 63: 96-118.
10. Burger, W.C. 1975. The species concept in Quercus. Taxon 24: 45-50.
11. Camus, A. 1929. Les chataigniers monographie des Castanea et Castanopsis. Encyclopédie economique de sylviculture, vol 3. Academie des Sciences, Paris.
12. Camus, A. 1936-1954. Les chenes monographie du genre Quercus (et Lithocarpus). Encyclopédie economique de sylviculture, vols. 6-8. Academie des Sciences, Paris.
13. Cannon, C.H. & Manos, P.S. 2000. The Bornean Lithocarpus Bl. section Synaedrys (Lindley) Barnett (Fagaceae): discussion of its circumscription and description of a new species. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 133: 343-357.
14. Cannon, C.H. & Manos, P.S. 2001. Combining and comparing morphometric shape descriptors with a molecular phylogeny: the case of fruit type evolution in Bornean Lithocarpus (Fagaceae). Syst. Biol. 50: 1-21.
15. Crepet, W.L. 1989. History and implications of the early North American fossil record of Fagaceae. Pp. 45-66 in: Crane, P.R. & Blackmore, S. (eds.), Evolution, Systematics and Fossil History of the Hamamelidae. Clarendon, Oxford.
16. Crepet, W.L. & Daghlian, C.P. 1980. Castaneoid inflorescences from the Middle Eocene of Tennessee and the diagnostic value of pollen (at the subfamily level) in Fagaceae. Amer. J. Bot. 67: 739-757.
17. Crepet, W.L. & Nixon, K.C. 1989a. Earliest megafossil evidence of Fagaceae: phylogenetic and biogeographic implications. Amer. J. Bot. 76: 842-855.
18. Crepet, W.L. & Nixon, K.C. 1989b. Extinct transitional Fagaceae from the Oligocene and their phylogenetic implications. Amer. J. Bot. 76: 1493-1505.
19. Culley, T.M., Weller, S.G. & Sakai, A.K. 2002. The evolution of wind pollination in angiosperms. Trends Ecol. Evol. 17: 361-369.
20. Daghlian, C.P. & Crepet, W.L. 1983. Oak catkins, leaves and fruits from the Oligocene Catahoula Formation and their evolutionary significance. Amer. J. Bot. 70: 639-649.
21. Dodd, M.E., Silvertown, J. & Chase, M.W. 1999. Phylogenetic analysis of trait evolution and species diversity variation among angiosperm families. Evolution 53: 732-744.
22. Doyle, J.J., Kanazin, V. & Shoemaker, R.C. 1996. Phylogenetic utility of histone H3 intron sequences in the perennial relatives of soybean (Glycine: Leguminosae). Molec. Phylog. Evol. 6: 438-447.
23. Emshwiller, E. & Doyle, J.J. 1999. Chloroplast-expressed glutamine synthetase (ncpGS): potential utility for phylogenetic studies with an example from Oxalis (Oxalidaceae). Molec. Phylog. Evol. 12: 310-319.
24. Endress, P.K. 1986. An emtomophily syndrome in Juglandaceae: Platycarya strobilacea. Veröff. Geobot. Inst. ETH Stiftung Rübel Zürich 87: 100-111.
25. Endress, P.K. 1977. Evolutionary trends in the Hamamelidales-Fagales group. Pl. Syst. Evol., Suppl. 1: 321-347.
26. Farris, J.S., Källersjö, M., Kluge, A.G. & Bult, C. 1994. Testing significance of incongruence. Cladistics 10: 315-319.
27. Felsenstein, J. 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39: 783-791.
28. Feng, Y., Oh, S. & Manos, P.S. 2005. Phylogeny and historical biogeography of the genus Platanus as inferred from nuclear and chloroplast DNA. Syst. Bot. 30: 786-799.
29. Fey, B.S. & Endress. P.K. 1983. Development and morphological interpretation of the cupule in Fagaceae. Flora 173: 451-468.
30. Forman, L.L. 1964. Trigonobalanus, a new genus of Fagaceae with notes on the classification of the family. Kew Bull. 17: 381-396.
31. Forman, L.L. 1966a. On the evolution of cupules in the Fagaceae. Kew Bull. 18: 385-419.
32. Forman, L.L. 1966b. Generic delimitation in the Castaneoideae (Fagaceae). Kew Bull. 18: 421-426.
33. Fourquin, C., Vinauger-Douard, M., Fogliani, B., Dumas, C. & Scutt, C.P. 2005. Evidence that CRABS CLAW and TOUSLED have conserved their roles in carpel development since the ancestor of the extant angiosperms. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 102: 4649-4654.
34. Frascaria, N., Maggia, L. Michaud, M. & Bousquet, J. 1993. The rbcL gene sequence from chestnut indicates a slow rate of evolution in the Fagaceae. Genome 36: 668-671.
35. Galloway, G.L., Malmberg, R.L. & Price, R.A. 1998. Phylogenetic utility of the nuclear gene arginine decarboxylase: an example from Brassicaceae. Molec. Phylog. Evol. 15: 1312-1320.
36. Gaskin, J.F. & Schaal, B.A. 2002. Hybrid Tamarix widespread in U.S. invasion and undetected in native Asian range. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 99: 11256-11259.
37. Gottlieb, L.D. & Ford, V.S. 1996. Phylogenetic relationships among the sections of Clarkia (Onagraceae) inferred from the nucleotide sequences of pgiC. Syst. Bot. 21: 45-62.
38. Hardin, J.W. 1975. Hybridization and introgression in Quercus alba. J. Arnold Arbor. 56: 336-363.
39. Herendeen, P.S., Crane, P.R. & Drinnan, A.N. 1995. Fagaceous flowers, fruits and cupules from the Campanian (Late Cretaceous) of central Georgia, USA. Int. J. Pl. Sci. 156: 93-116.
40. Hjelmquist, H. 1948. Studies on the floral morphology and phylogeny of the Amentiferae. Bot. Not. Suppl. 2: 1-171.
41. Howard, D.J., Preszler, R.W., Williams, J., Fenchel, S. & Boecklen, W.J. 1997. How discrete are oak species? Insights from a hybrid zone between Quercus grisea and Quercus gambelii. Evolution 51: 747-755.
42. Howarth, D.G. & Baum, D.A. 2002. Phylogenetic utility of a nuclear intron from nitrate reductase for the study of closely related plant species. Molec. Phylog. Evol. 23: 525-528.
43. Huelsenbeck, J.P. & Ronquist, F. 2001. MrBayes: Bayesian inference of phylogeny. Bioinformatics 17: 754-755.
44. Hutchinson, J. 1967. The Genera of Flowering Plants, vol 2, Dicotyledons. Oxford Univ. Press, London.
45. Jenkins, R. 1993. The origin of the fagaceous cupule. Bot. Rev. 59: 81-111.
46. Jones, J.H. 1986. Evolution of the Fagaceae: the implications of foliar features. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 73: 228-275.
47. Kaul, R.B. & Abbe, E.C. 1984. Inflorescence architecture and evolution in the Fagaceae. J. Arnold Arbor. 65: 375-401.
48. Kuprianova, A.L. 1962. Palynological data and the systematics of the Fagales and Urticales. Pp. 17-25 in: Soviet Reports from the First International Palynological Conference. Academy of Sciences, Moscow.
49. Kvacek, Z. & Walther, H. 1989. Paleobotanical studies in Fagaceae of the European Tertiary. Pl. Syst. Evol. 162: 213-229.
50. Kvacek, Z. & Walther, H. 1992. History of Fagus in central Europe - an attempt of new interpretation of Fagus evolution. Pp. 169-172 in: Kovar-Eder, J. (ed.), Paleovegetational Development in Europe and Regions Relevant to its Paleofloristic Evolution. Museum of Natural History, Vienna.
51. Lee, J., Baum, S.F., Oh, S., Jiang, C., Chen, J. & Bowman, J.L. 2005. Recruitment of CRABS CLAW to promote nectary development within the eudicot clade. Development 132: 5021-5032.
52. Lewis, C.E. & Doyle, J.J. 2001. Phylogenetic utility of the nuclear gene malate synthase in the palm family (Arecaceae). Molec. Phylog. Evol. 19: 409-420.
53. Lexer, C., Kremer, A. & Petit, R.-J. 2006. Shared alleles in sympatric oaks: recurrent gene flow is a more parsimonious explanation than ancestral polymorphism. Molec. Ecol. 15: 2007-2012.
54. Li, R.-Q., Chen, Z.-D., Lu, Z.-D., Soltis, D.E., Soltis, P.S. & Manos, P.S. 2004. Phylogenetic relationships in Fagales based on DNA sequences from three genomes. Int. J. Pl. Sci. 16511-324.
55. Linder, H.P. 1998. Morphology and the evolution of wind pollination. Pp. 123-135 in: Owen, S.J. & Rudall, P.J. (eds.), Reproductive Biology. Royal Botanical Garden, Kew.
56. Lozano, C.F., Hernandes-Camacho, J. & Henao, J. E. 1979. Hallazgo del genero Trigonobalanus Forman 1962 (Fagaceae) en el Neotropica. I. Caldasia 12: 517-537.
57. MacDonald, A.D. 1979. Inception of the cupule of Quercus macrocarpa and Fagus grandifolia. Canad. J. Bot. 57: 1777-1782.
58. Maddison, D.R. & Maddison, W.P. 2000. MacClade 4: Analysis of Phylogeny and Character Evolution. Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts.
59. Manchester, S.R. 1994. Fruits and seeds of the middle Eocene Nut Beds Flora, Clarno Formation, Oregon. Palaeontogr. Amer. 58: 1-205.
60. Manchester, S.R. 1999. Biogeographical relationships of North American Tertiary floras. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 86: 472-522.
61. Manchester, S.R. & Dillhoff, R.M. 2004. Fagus (Fagaceae) fruits, foliage & pollen from the Middle Eocene of Pacific Northwestern North America. Canad. J. Bot. 82: 1509-1517.
62. Manos, P.S., Doyle, J.J. & Nixon, K.C. 1999. Phylogeny biogeography and processes of molecular differentiation in Quercus subgenus Quercus (Fagaceae). Molec. Phylog. Evol. 12: 333-349.
63. Manos, P.S., Nixon, K.C. & Doyle, J.J. 1993. Cladistic analysis of restriction site variation within the chloroplast DNA inverted repeat region of selected Hamamelididae. Syst. Bot. 18: 551-562.
64. Manos, P.S. & Stanford, A.M. 2001. The biogeography of Fagaceae: tracking the Tertiary history of temperate and subtropical forests of the Northern Hemisphere. Int. J. Pl. Sci. 162: S77-S93.
65. Manos, P.S. & Steele, K.P. 1997. Phylogenetic analyses of 'higher' Hamamelididae based on plastid sequence data. Amer. J. Bot. 84: 1407-1419.
66. Manos, P.S., Zhou, Z. & Cannon, C.H. 2001. Systematics of Fagaceae: phylogenetic tests of reproductive trait evolution. Int. J. Pl. Sci. 162: 1361-1379.
67. Mason-Gamer, R.J., Weil, C.F. & Kellogg, E.A. 1998. Granule-bound starch synthases: structure, function & phylogenetic utility. Molec. Phylog. Evol. 15: 1658-1673.
68. Mathews, S., Lavin, M. & Sharrock, R.A. 1995. Evolution of the phytochrome gene family and its utility for phylogenetic analyses of angiosperms. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 82: 296-321.
69. Miller, R.E., Rausher, M.D. & Manos, P.S. 1999. Phylogenetic systematics of Ipomoea (Convolvulaceae) based on ITS and waxy sequences. Syst. Bot. 24: 209-227.
70. Mindell, R.A., Stockey, R.A. & Beard, G. 2007. Cascadiacarpa spinosa gen. et sp. nov. (Fagaceae): castaneoid fruits from the Eocene of Vancouver Island, Canada. Amer. J. Bot. 94: 351-361.
71. Nixon, K.C. 1993. Infrageneric classification of Quercus (Fagaceae) and typification of sectional names. Ann. Sci. Forest. 50 (Supplement): 25S-34S.
72. Nixon, K.C. 1985. A biosystematic study of Quercus section Virentes (the live oaks) with phylogenetic analyses of Fagales, Fagaceae and Quercus. Ph. D. dissertation, University of Texas, Austin.
73. Nixon, K.C. 1989. Origins of Fagaceae. Pp. 23-44 in Crane, P.R. & Blackmore, S. (eds.), Evolution, Systematics and Fossil History of the Hamamelidae. Clarendon, Oxford.
74. Nixon, K.C. 1997. Fagaceae. Pp. 436-506 in: Flora of North America Editorial Committee (ed.), Flora of North America north of Mexico, vol. 3, Magnoliophyta: Magnoliidae and Hamamelidae. Oxford Univ. Press, New York.
75. Nixon K.C. & Carpenter, J.M. 1996. On consensus, collapsibility & clade concordance. Cladistics 12: 305-321.
76. Nixon, K.C. & Crepet, W.L. 1989. Trigonobalanus (Fagaceae): taxonomic status and phylogenetic relationships. Amer. J. Bot. 6: 828-841.
77. Oh, S. & Manos, P.S. 2006. Cups, nuts & catkins: a phylogeny of Fagaceae based on CRABS CLAW sequences. P. 246 in: Abstracts of Botany 2006. Chico, California.
78. Oh, S. & Potter, D. 2003. Phylogenetic utility of the second intron of LEAFY in Neillia and Stephanandra (Rosacaeae) and implications for the origin of Stephanandra. Molec. Phylog. Evol. 29: 203-215.
79. Okamoto, M. 1989a. New interpretation of the inflorescence of Fagus drawn from the developmental study of Fagus crenata with description of an extremely monstrous cupule. Amer. J. Bot. 76: 14-22.
80. Okamoto, M. 1989b. A comparative study of the ontogenetic development of the cupules in Castanea and Lithocarpus (Fagaceae). Pl. Syst. Evol. 168: 7-18.
81. Okamoto, M. 1991. Evolutionary trends in the inflorescences and cupules of the northern Fagaceae. Bull. Osaka Mus. Nat. His. 45: 33-48.
82. Oxelman, B., Yoshikawa, N., McConaughy, B.L., Lou, J., Denton, A.L. & Hall, B.D. 2004. Rpb2 gene phylogeny in flowering plants, with particular emphasis on asterids. Molec. Phylog. Evol. 32: 462-479.
83. Petit, R.-J., Bodénès, C., Ducousso, A., Roussel, G. & Kremer, A. 2003. Hybridization as a mechanism of invasion in oaks. New Phytol. 161: 151-164.
84. Posada, D. & Crandall, K.A. 1998. Modeltest: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14: 817-818.
85. Qiu, Y.-L., Chase, M.W., Hoot, S.B., Conti, E., Crane, P.R., Sytsma, K.J. & Parks, C.R. 1998. Phylogenetics of the Hamamelidae and their allies: parsimony analyses of nucleotide sequences of the plastid gene rbcL. Int. J. Pl. Sci. 159: 891-905.
86. Sambrook, E., Fritzch, F. & Maniatis, T. 1989. Molecular Cloning. Cold Spring Harbor Press, New York.
87. Sang, T., Donoghue, M.J. & Zhang, D. 1997. Evolution of alcohol dehydrogenase genes in peonies (Paeonia): phylogenetic relationships of putative nonhybrid species. Molec. Phylog. Evol. 14: 994-1007.
88. Savolainen, V., Chase, M.W., Hoot, S.B., Morton, C.M., Soltis, D.E., Bayer, C., Fay, M.F., de Bruijin, A.Y., Sullivan, S. & Qiu, Y.-L. 2000a. Phylogenetics of flowering plants based on combined analysis of plastid atpB and rbcL gene sequences. Syst. Biol. 49: 306-362.
89. Savolainen, V., Fay, M.F., Albach, D.C., Backlund, A., van der Bank, M., Cameron, K.M., Johnson, S.A., Lledo, M.D., Pintaud, J.-C., Powell, M., Sheahan, M.C., Soltis, D.E., Solits, P.E., Weston, P., Whitten, W.M., Wurdack, K. & Chase, M.W. 2000b. Phylogeny of the eudicots: a nearly complete family analysis based on rbcL sequences. Kew Bull. 55: 257-309.
90. Siegfried, K.R., Eshed, Y., Baum, S.F., Otsuga, D., Drews, G.N. & Bowman, J.L. 1999. Members of the YABBY gene family specify abaxial cell fate in Arabidopsis. Development 126: 4117-4128.
91. Shimodaira, H. & Hasegawa, M. 1999. Multiple comparisons of log-likelihoods with applications to phylogenetic inference. Molec. Biol. Evol. 16: 1114-1116.
92. Sims, H.P., Herendeen, P.S. & Crane, P.R. 1998. New genus of fossil Fagaceae from the Santonian (Late Cretaceous) of central Georgia, USA. Int. J. Pl. Sci. 159: 391-404.
93. Soepadmo, E. 1968. A revision of the genus Quercus L. subgen. Cyclobalanopsis (Oersted) Schneider. Gard. Bull. Singapore 22: 355-427.
94. Soepadmo, E. 1972. Fagaceae. Pp. 265-403 in: van Steenis, C.G.G.J. (ed.), Flora Malesiana, series I, 7. P. Noordhoff, Leyden, Netherlands.
95. Stebbins, G.L. & Major, J. 1965. Endemism and speciation in the California flora. Ecol. Monogr. 35: 1-35.
96. Swofford, D.L. 2002. PAUP* Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (*and Other Methods), version 4.0. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts.
97. Tank, D.C. & Sang, T. 2001. Phylogenetic utility of the glycerol-3phosphate acyltransferase gene: evolution and implication in Paeonia (Paeoniaceae). Molec. Phylog. Evol. 19: 421-429.
98. Tovar-Sánchez, E. & Oyama, K. 2004. Natural hybridization and hybrid zones between Quercus crassifolia and Quercus crassipes (Fagaceae) in Mexico: morphological and molecular evidence. Amer. J. Bot. 91: 1352-1363.
99. Walther, H. 2000. Floristic relations between North and Central America and Europe in the Eocene. Acta Univ. Carol., Geol. 44: 51-58.
100. Weese, T.L. & Johnson, L.A. 2005. Utility of NADP-dependent isocitrate dehydrogenase for species-level evolutionary inference in angiosperm phylogeny: a case study in Saltugilia. Molec. Phylog. Evol. 36: 24-41.
101. Whittemore, A.T. & Schaal, B.A. 1991. Interspecific gene flow in sympatric oaks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 88: 2540-2544.
102. Wolfe, K.H. 1991. Protein-coding genes in chloroplast DNA: compilation of nucleotide sequences, database entries & rates of molecular evolution, in: Bogorad, L. & Vasil, I.K. (eds.), Cell Culture and Somatic Cell Genetics of Plants, vol. 7B, chapter 15. Academic Press, New York.
103. Yamaguchi, T., Nagasawa, N., Kawasaki, S., Matusoka, M., Nagato, Y. & Hirano, H. 2004. The YABBY gene DROOPING LEAF regulates carpel specification and midrib development in Oryza sativa. Pl. Cell 16: 500-509.
104. Zwickl, D.J. 2006. Genetic algorithm approaches for the phylogenetic analysis of large biological sequence datasets under the maximum likelihood criterion. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Texas, Austin. http://www.bio.utexas.edu/faculty/antisense/garli/Garli.html. [Accessed 10 May 2007]