Accountability and Educational Reform: A Critical Analysis of Four Perspectives and Considerations for Enhancing Reform Efforts

Educational Psychologist

Volumn 45, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 138-148

  Good, Thomas L ^a   Wiley, Caroline R H ^a   Sabers, Darrell ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77950887327     PISSN: 00461520     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00461521003720171     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Alexander, K. L., Entwisle, D. R., & Olson, L. S. (2001). Schools, achievement, and inequality: A Seasonal Perspective. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 23(2), 171-191.
2. Anderman, E. M., Anderman, L. H., Yough, M. S., & Gimbert, B. G. (2010/this issue). Value-added models of assessment: Implications for motivation and accountability. Educational Psychologist, 45, 123-137.
3. Bloom,B.S.(1968).Learningformastery.EvaluationComment,1(2),1-12.
4. Darling-Hammond, L. (2007). The flat earth and education: How America's commitment to equity will determine our future. Educational Researcher, 36(6),318-334.
5. Deutsch, M. (1949). An experimental study of the effects of co-operation and competition upon group process. Human Relations, 2, 199-231.
6. Dillon, S. (2010, February 1). Obama to seek sweeping change in 'No Child' Law. New York Times. Available from http://www.nytimes.com
7. Dolan, A. L., & McCaslin, M. (2008). Student perceptions of teacher support. Teachers College Record, 110, 2423-2437.
8. Ebmeier, H., & Good, T. L. (1979). The effects of instructing teachers about good teaching on the mathematics achievement of fourth-grade students. American Educational Research Journal, 16, 1-16.
9. Entwisle, D. R., Alexander, K. L., & Olson, L. S. (1997). Children, schools, and inequality. Boulder, CO: Westview.
10. Forte, E.(2010/thisissue).Examining the assumptions underlying the NCLB federal accountability policy on school improvement. Educational Psy- chologist, 45, 76-88.
11. Gladwell, M. (2008). Outliers. New York, NY: Little, Brown. Good, T. L. (2008). In the midst of comprehensive school reform: Principal's perspectives. Teachers College Record, 110, 2341-2360.
12. Good, T. L. (2010). Forty years of research on teaching 1968-2008. What do we know now that we didn't know then? In R. Marzano (Ed.), On excellence in teaching (pp. 31-64). Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree Press.
13. Good, T. L., & Brophy, J. (2008). Looking in classrooms (10th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
14. Good, T. L., & McCaslin, M. (2005). CSR principal perceptions of sup- port from the State Department of Education. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 10(1), 35-51.
15. Good, T. L., & McCaslin, M. (2008). What we learned about research on school reform: Considerations for practice and policy. Teachers College Record, 110, 2475-2495.
16. Guskey, T. R. (2008). Mastery learning. In T. L. Good (Ed.), 21st century education: A reference handbook (Vol. 1, pp. 194-202). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
17. Hess, F. M., & Petrilli, M. J. (2006). No Child Left Behind: Primer. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
18. Hiebert, J., & Grouws, D. A. (2007). The effects of classroom mathematics teaching on students' learning. In F. K. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 371-404). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
19. Hochberg, E. D, & Desimone, L. M. (2010/this issue). Professional development in the accountability context: Building capacity to achieve standards. Educational Psychologist, 45, 89-106.
20. Kennedy, M. (2005). Inside teaching: How classroom life undermines reform. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Press.
21. Konstantopoulos, S. (2009). Effects of teachers on minority and disadvantaged students' achievement in early grades. Elementary School Journal, 110(1),92-113.
22. Kozol, J. (1991). Savage Inequalities. New York, NY: Crown.
23. Linn, R.L.(2008). Methodological issues inachieving school accountability. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 40, 699-711.
24. Malen, B., & Rice, J. K. (2004). A framework for assessing the impact of education reforms on school capacity: Insights from studies of high-stakes accountability initiatives. Educational Policy, 18, 631-660.
25. Massell, D. (1998). State strategies for building capacity for education: progress and continuing challenges (Research Report Series RR-41). Philadelphia, PA: Consortium for Policy Research in Education.
26. McCaslin, M. (2006). Student motivational dynamics in the era of school reform. The Elementary School Journal, 106, 479-490.
27. McCaslin, M. (2008). Learning motivation: The role of opportunity. Teachers College Record, 110, 2408-2422.
28. McCaslin, M., & Burross, H. L. (2008). Student motivational dynamics. Teachers College Record, 110, 2452-2463.
29. McCaslin, M., & Good, T. (2008). School reform matters. Teachers College Record, 110, 2317-2318.
30. McCaslin, M., Good, T. L., Nichols, S., Zhang, J., Wiley, C. R. H., Bozack A. R.... Cuizon-Garcia, R. (2006). Comprehensive school reform: An observational study of teaching in Grades 3 through 5. Elementary School Journal, 106, 313-331.
31. Mintop, H., & Trujillo, T. (2005). Corrective action in low-performing schools: Lessons for NCLB implementation from state and district strate- gies in first generation accountability systems. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 13(48), 1-30.
32. No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (2002). Pub. L. 107-110.
33. Nye, B., Konstantopoulos, S., & Hedges, L. V. (2004). How large are teacher effects? Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 26, 237-257.
34. Olson, A. M., & Sabers, D. (2008). Standardized tests. In T. L. Good (Ed.), 21st century education: A reference handbook (Vol. 1, pp. 423-430). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
35. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2007). PISA 2006 results. Retrieved from http://www.pisa.oecd.org/document/2/0,3343,en 32252351 32236191 39718850 1 1 1 1,00.html
36. Popham, W. J., Keller, T., Moulding, B., Pellegrino, J. W., & Sandifer, P. (2005). Instructionally supportive accountability tests in science: A viable assessment option? Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 3, 121-179.
37. Porter, A. C., Linn, R. L., & Trimble, C. S. (2005). The effects of state de- cisions about NCLB adequate yearly progress targets. Educational Mea- surement: Issues and Practice, 24(4), 32-39.
38. Powell, A. G., Farrar, E., & Cohen, D. K. (1985). The shopping mall high school: Winners and losers in the educational marketplace. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
39. Reschly, D., & Sabers, D. (1974, June). Open education: Have we been there before? Phi Delta Kappan, 675-677.
40. Rohrkemper, M., & Corno, L. (1988). Success and failure on classroom tasks: Adaptive learning and classroom teaching. Elementary School Journal, 88, 296-312.
41. Rothstein, R. (2000). Toward a composite index of school performance. Elementary School Journal, 100, 409-441.
42. Ryan, R. M., & Brown, K. W. (2005). Legislating competence: High-stakes testing policies and their relations with psychological theories and research. In A. J. Elliot & C. S. Dweck (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 354-372). New York: Guilford.
43. Sabers, D. L. (1996). By their tests we will know them. Language, Speech, Hearing Services in Schools, 27, 138-144.
44. Sabers, D., & Sabers, D. (1996). Conceptualizing, measuring, and implementing higher (or hire) standards. Educational Researcher, 25(8), 19-21.
45. Sawchuk, S. (2010, February 3). States rush to join testing consortia. Education Week. Available from http://www.edweek.org
46. Saxe, G. B., Gearhart, M., & Seltzer, M. (1999). Relations between class- room practices and student learning in the domain of fractions. Cognition and Instruction, 17(1), 1-24.
47. Silver, E. A., Mesa, V. M., Morris, K. A., Star, J. R., & Benken, B. M. (2009). Teaching mathematics for understanding: An analysis of lessons submitted by teachers seeking NBPTS certification. American Educational Research Journal, 46, 501-531.
48. Smith, M., & O'Day, J. (1991). Putting the pieces together: Systemic school reform (CPRE Policy Brief). New Brunswick, NJ: Eagleton Institute of Politics.
49. Urdan, T., & Mestas, M. (2006). The goals behind performance goals. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 354-365.
50. U.S. Department of Education. (2010). Race to the Top Fund. Retrieved from http://www2.ed.gov/programs/racetothetop/index.html
51. Wiley, C. R. H., Good, T., & McCaslin, M. (2008). Comprehensive school reform instructional practices throughout a school year: The role of sub- ject matter, grade level, and time of year. Teachers College Record, 110, 2361-2388.
52. Wiliam, D. (2010/this issue). Standardized testing and school accountability. Educational Psychologist, 45, 107-122.