The effects of state decisions about NCLB adequate yearly progress targets

Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice

Volumn 24, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 32-39

  Porter, Andrew C ^a   Linn, Robert L ^b   Scott Trimble, C ^c  

^a VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

^c Learning Sciences Institute ^*

Author keywords

Accountability; No child left behind; State policy

Indexed keywords

EID: 29244445814     PISSN: 07311745     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-3992.2005.00021.x     Document Type: Article

References (6)

1. Chubb, J., Linn, R., Haycock, K., & Wiener, R. (2005). Do we need to repair the monu ment? Debating the future of No Child Left Behind. Education Next, 5(2), 9-19.
2. Cowan, K. T. (2003). The new title I: The changing landscape of accountability. Washington, DC: Thompson Publishing Group.
3. Linn, R. L. (2003). Accountability: Responsibility and reasonable expectations. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 3-13.
4. Linn, R., Baker, E., & Betebenner, D. (2002). Accountability systems: Implications of requirements of the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. Educational Researcher, 31 ( 6), 3-16.
5. No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (NCLB). (2001). Pub. Law No. 107.110.
6. United States Department of Education (2005). Approved state accountability plans. Retrieved from http://www.ed.gov/admins/lead/account/ stateplans03/index.html.