What we learned about research on school reform: Considerations for practice and policy

Teachers College Record

Volumn 110, Issue 11, 2008, Pages 2475-2495

  Good, Thomas L ^a   Mccaslin, Mary ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 57049106321     PISSN: 01614681     EISSN: 14679620     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Baldi, S.,Jin, Y., Skemer, M., Green, PJ., & Herget, D. (2007). Highlights from PISA 2006: Performance of U.S. 15year-old students in science and mathematics literacy in an international context (NCES 2008-016). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
2. Balfanz, R., Legters, N., West, T. C., & Weber, L. M. (2007). Are NCLB's measures, incentives, and improvement strategies the right ones for the nation's low-performing high schools? American Educational Research Journal, 3, 559-593.
3. Biddle, B. (1997). Foolishness, dangerous nonsense, and real correlates of state differences in achievement. Phi Delta Kappan, 79, 8-13.
4. Borman, G. D., Slavin, R. E., Cheung, A. C. K., Chamberlain, A. M., Madden, N. A., & Chambers, B. (2007). Final reading outcomes of the national randomized field trial of Success for All. American Educational Research Journal, 3, 701-731.
5. Center on Education Policy. (2006). From the capital to the classroom: Year 4 of the No Child Left Behind Act. Retrieved September 21, 2007, from http://www.Cep-dc.org/-data/global/nidocs/CEP-NCLB-Report-4.pdf
6. Cross, C. T. (2004). Putting the pieces together: Lessons from comprehensive school reform research. Washington, DC: NCCSR.
7. Darling-Hammond, L. (2007). The flat earth and education: How America's commitment to equity will determine our future. Educational Researcher, 36(6), 318-334.
8. Elawar, M. C., & Corno, L. (1985). A factorial experiment in teachers' written feedback on student homework: Changing teacher behavior a little rather than a lot. Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 162-173.
9. Good, T. L., & Nichols, S. L. (2001). Expectancy effects in the classroom: A special focus on improving the reading performance of minority students in first-grade classrooms. Educational Psychologist, 36, 113-126.
10. Jackson, P. (1968). Life in classrooms. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
11. Kennedy, M. (2005). Inside teaching: How classroom life undermines reform. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
12. Ladson-Billings, G. J. (2006, April). From the achievement gap to the education debt: Understanding achievement in U.S. schools. Presidential address at the American Educational Research Association annual meeting, San Francisco, CA.
13. McCaslin, M. (1996). The problem of problem representation: The Summit's conception ofstudent. Educational Researcher, 25(8), 13-15.
14. McCaslin, M., & Good, T. (1996). The informal curriculum. In D. Berliner & R. Calfee (Eds.), The handbook of educational psychology (1st ed., pp. 622-670). New York: American Psychological Association/Macmillan.
15. McCaslin, M., & Good, T. L. (2008). A study of Comprehensive School Reform programs in Arizona. Teachers College Record, 110(11).
16. McCaslin, M., Good, T. L., Nichols, S., Zhang, J., Wiley, C. R. H., Bozack, A. R., et al. (2006). Comprehensive School Reform: An observational study of teaching in Grades 3 through 5. Elementary School Journal, 106, 313-331.
17. Miller, R. T., Murnane, R. J., & Willett, J. B. (2007). Do teacher absences impact student achievement? Longitudinal evidence from one urban school district (NBER Working Paper No. 13356). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research..
18. Moll, L. C., Amanti, C., Neff, D., & Gonzalez, N. (1992). Funds of knowledge for teaching: Using a qualitative approach to connect home and classrooms. Theory Into Practice, 31, 132-141.
19. National Association of School Boards of Education. (2007, October). Meeting the challenge: The state's role in improving low-performing schools. The Report of the SASBE Study Group on Models of Success for Reconstitution. Alexandria, VA: Author.
20. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development - Early Child Care Research Network. (2005). A day in third grade: A large-scale study of classroom quality and teacher and student behavior. Elementary Schoolfournal, 105, 305-323.
21. Natriello, G. (1996). Diverting attention from conditions in American schools. Educational Researcher, 25(8), 7-9.
22. Nichols, S. L., & Good, T. L. (2004). America's teenagers - myths and realities: Media images, schooling, and the social costs of careless indifference. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
23. Oakes, J., Ormseth, T., Bell, R. M., & Camp, P. (1990). Multiplying inequalities: The effects of race, social class, and tracking on opportunities to learn math and science. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
24. Porter, A. C. (1989). A curriculum of balance: The case of elementary school mathematics. Educational Researcher, 18(5),9-15.
25. Porter, A., Floden, R., Freeman, D., Schmidt, W., & Schwille, J. (1989). Content determinants in elementary school mathematics. In D. A. Grouws & T.J. Cooney (Eds.), Effective mathematics teaching (pp. 96-113). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
26. Scarpinato, D. (2005, March 28). Two "failing" schools chart the future. Arizona Daily Star Retrieved March 28, 2005, from http://www.dailystar.com/
27. Socias, M., Chambers, J., Esra, P., & Shambaugh, L. (2007). The distribution of teaching and learning resources in California's middle and high schools (Issues & Answers Report, REL 2007-No.023). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Educational Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Regional Educational Laboratory West.
28. Stevenson, Z., Schertzer, S. T., & Ham, D. E. (in press). No Child Left Behind: Intent and requirements. In T. L. Good (Ed.), 21st century education: A reference handbook. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
29. Waller, W. (1961). The sociology of teaching. New York: Russell and Russell. (Original work published 1932)
30. Weick, K. E. (1984). Small wins: Redefining the scale of social problems. American Psychologist, 39, 40-49.