Context Effects on the Processing of Action-Relevant Object Features

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

Volumn 36, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 330-340

  Girardi, Giovanna ^a   Lindemann, Oliver ^b   Bekkering, Harold ^b  

^a SAPIENZA UNIVERSITY OF ROME   (Italy)

^b RADBOUD UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

action context; action intention; action observation; object affordance; object grasping

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; COGNITION; HAND STRENGTH; HUMAN; MOVEMENT (PHYSIOLOGY); PATTERN RECOGNITION; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; RECOGNITION; VISION;

BIOMECHANICS; COGNITION; HAND STRENGTH; HUMANS; MOVEMENT; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 77950586574     PISSN: 00961523     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0017180     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Bertenthal B.I., Longo M.R., and Kosobud A. Imitative response tendencies following observation of intransitive actions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 32 (2006) 210-225
2. Brass M., Bekkering H., and Prinz W. Movement observation affects movement execution in a simple response task. Acta Psychologica 106 (2001) 3-22
3. Brass M., Bekkering H., Wohlschläger A., and Prinz W. Compatibility between observed and executed finger movements: Comparing symbolic, spatial and imitative cues. Brain Cognition 44 (2000) 124-143
4. Bub D.N., and Masson M.E.J. Gestural knowledge evoked by objects as part of conceptual representations. Aphasiology 20 (2006) 1112-1124
5. Craighero L., Fadiga L., Rizzolatti G., and Umiltà C. Action for perception: A motor-visual attentional effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 25 (1999) 1673-1692
6. Derbyshire N., Ellis R., and Tucker M. The potentiation of two components of the reach-to-grasp action during object categorization in visual memory. Acta Psychologica 122 (2006) 74-98
7. Ellis R., and Tucker M. Micro-affordance: The potentiation of components of action by seen objects. British Journal of Psychology 9 (2000) 451-471
8. Ellis R., Tucker M., Symes E., and Vainio L. Does selecting one visual object from several require inhibition of the actions associated with nonselected objects?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 33 (2007) 670-691
9. Fagioli S., Ferlazzo F., and Hommel B. Controlling attention through action: Observing actions primes action-related stimulus dimensions. Neuropsychologia 45 (2007) 3351-3355
10. Fagioli S., Hommel B., and Schubotz R.I. Intentional control of attention: Action planning primes action-related stimulus dimensions. Psychological Research 71 (2007) 22-29
11. Gentilucci M., Benuzzi F., Bertolani L., Daprati E., and Gangitano M. Language and motor control. Experimental Brain Research 13 (2000) 468-490
12. Gibson J.J. The ecological approach to visual perception (1979), Houghton-Mifflin, Boston
13. Glover S. Separate visual representations in the planning and control of actions. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (2004) 3-24
14. Glover S., Rosenbaum D.A., Graham J., and Dixon P. Grasping the meaning of words. Experimental Brain Research 154 (2004) 103-108
15. Greenwald A.G. Sensory feedback mechanisms in performance control: With special reference to the ideomotor mechanism. Psychological Review 77 (1970) 73-99
16. Hamilton A., Wolpert D.M., and Frith U. Your own action influences how you perceive another person's action. Current Biology 14 (2004) 493-498
17. Hommel B. Stimulus-response compatibility and the Simon effect: Toward an empirical clarification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 21 (1995) 764-775
18. Hommel, B. (in press). Grounding attention in action control: The intentional control of selection. In B. J. Bruya (Ed.), Effortless attention: A new perspective in the cognitive science of attention and action. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
19. Hommel B., Müsseler J., Aschersleben G., and Prinz W. The theory of event coding (TEC): A framework for perception and action planning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (2001) 849-937
20. Kornblum S., Hasbroucq T., and Osman A. Dimensional overlap: Cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility: A model and taxonomy. Psychological Review 97 (1990) 253-270
21. Lindemann O., Abolafia J.M., Girardi G., and Bekkering H. Getting a grip on numbers: Numerical magnitude priming in object grasping. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 33 (2007) 1400-1409
22. Lindemann O., and Bekkering H. Object manipulation and motion perception: Evidence of an influence of action planning on visual processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 35 (2009) 1062-1071
23. Lindemann O., Stenneken P., van Schie H.T., and Bekkering H. Semantic activation in action planning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 32 (2006) 633-643
24. Müsseler J., and Hommel B. Blindness to response-compatible stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 23 (1997) 861-872
25. Paulus, M., Lindemann, O., & Bekkering, H. (in press). Motor simulation in verbal knowledge acquisition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology
26. Phillips J.C., and Ward R. S-R compatibility effects of irrelevant visual affordance: Timecourse and specificity of response activation. Visual Cognition 9 (2002) 540-558
27. Prinz W. A common coding approach to perception and action. In: Neumann O., and Prinz W. (Eds). Relationships between perception and action: Current approaches (1990), Springer, Berlin 167-201
28. Ratcliff R. Group reaction time distributions and an analysis of distribution statistics. Psychological Bulletin 86 (1979) 446-461
29. Rosenbaum D.A., Meulenbroek R.J., Vaughan J., and Jansen C. Posture-based motion planning: Applications to grasping. Psychological Review 108 (2001) 709-734
30. Schubö A., Prinz W., and Aschersleben G. Perceiving while acting: Action affects perception. Psychological Research 68 (2004) 208-215
31. Simon J.R. Reactions toward the source of stimulation. Journal of Experimental Psychology 81 (1969) 174-176
32. Stürmer B., Aschersleben G., and Prinz W. Correspondence effects with manual gestures and postures: A study on imitation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 26 (2000) 1746-1759
33. Tipper S., Paul M.A., and Hayes A.E. Vision-for-action: The effects of object property discrimination and action state on affordance compatibility effects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 13 (2006) 493-498
34. Tucker M., and Ellis R. The potentiation of grasp types during visual object categorization. Visual Cognition 8 (2001) 769-800
35. Vainio L., Symes E., Ellis R., Tucker M., and Ottoboni G. On the relations between action planning, object identification, and motor representations of observed actions and objects. Cognition 108 (2008) 444-465
36. Vainio L., Tucker M., and Ellis R. Precision and power grip priming by observed grasping. Brain and Cognition 65 (2007) 195-207
37. Wohlschläger A. Visual motion priming by invisible actions. Vision Research 40 (2000) 925-930
38. Yoon E.Y., and Humphreys G.W. Direct and indirect effects of action on object classification. Memory & Cognition 33 (2005) 1131-1146
39. Zwickel J., Grosjean M., and Prinz W. Seeing while moving: Measuring the online influence of action on perception. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 60 (2007) 1063-1071