Seeing while moving: Measuring the online influence of action on perception

Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology

Volumn 60, Issue 8, 2007, Pages 1063-1071

  Zwickel, Jan ^a,b   Grosjean, Marc ^a,c   Prinz, Wolfgang ^a  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR HUMAN COGNITIVE AND BRAIN SCIENCES   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^c LEIBNIZ RESEARCH CENTRE FOR WORKING ENVIRONMENT AND HUMAN FACTORS   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; HUMAN; MOVEMENT (PHYSIOLOGY); MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; SHORT TERM MEMORY; TIME; VISION; VISUAL ILLUSION;

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ATTENTION; HUMANS; MEMORY, SHORT-TERM; MOTION PERCEPTION; MOVEMENT; OPTICAL ILLUSIONS; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; TIME FACTORS; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 34547516390     PISSN: 17470218     EISSN: 17470226     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/17470210701288722     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Caessens, B., Notebaert, W., Burle, B., Sc Soetens, E. (2005). Voluntary and involuntary control over automatic processing in spatial congruency tasks: Editors' introduction. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 17, 577-589.
2. Chua, R., & Weeks, D. J. (1997). Dynamical explorations of compatibility in perception-action coupling. In B. Hommel &W. Prinz (Eds.), Theoretical issues in stimulus-response compatibility (pp. 373-398). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
3. Ehrenstein, W. H., Cavonius, C. R., & Lewke, E. (1996). Spatial visuo-motor compatibility and manual control in a tracking task In K. A. Brookhuis, C. Weikert, & C. R. Cavonius (Eds.), Human factors in training and simulation (pp. 12-22). Groningen, The Netherlands: University of Groningen, Traffic Research Center, VSC.
4. Hamilton, A., Wolpert, D., & Frith, U. (2004). Your own action influences how you perceive another person's action. Current Biology, 14, 493-498.
5. Hommel, B., Müsseler, J., Aschersleben, G., & Prinz, W. (2001). The theory of event coding (TEC): A framework for perception and action planning. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 24, 849-937.
6. Hommel, B., & Prinz, W. (Eds.). (1997). Theoretical issues in stimulus-response compatibility. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
7. Kerzel, D. (2001). Visual short-term memory is influenced by haptic perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 27, 1101-1109.
8. Miall, R. C., Stanley, J., Todhunter, S., Levick, C., Lindo, S., & Miall, J. D. (2006). Performing hand actions assists the visual discrimination of similar hand postures. Neuropsychologia, 44, 966-976.
9. Michaels, C. F., & Stins, J. F. (1997). An ecological approach to stimulus-response compatibility. In B. Hommel & W. Prinz (Eds.), Theoretical issues in stimulus-response compatibility (pp. 333-360). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
10. Moore, C. M., Grosjean, M., & Lleras, A. (2003). Using inattentional blindness as an operational definition of unattended: The case of perceptual completion. Visual Cognition, 10, 299-318.
11. Müsseier, J., & Hommel, B. (1997). Blindness to response-compatible stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 861-872.
12. Niemi, P., & Näätänen, R. (1981). Foreperiod and simple reaction time. Psychological Bulletin, 89, 133-162.
13. Pashler, H. (1994). Dual-task interference in simple tasks: Data and theory. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 220-244.
14. Posner, M., & Keele, S. (1969). Attention demands of movements. In Proceedings of the XVI International Congress of Applied Psychology (pp. 418-422). Amsterdam: Swets Sc Zeitlinger.
15. Prinz, W. (1990). A common coding approach to perception and action. In O. Neumann & W. Prinz (Eds.), Relationships between perception and action: Current approaches (pp. 167-201). New York: Springer.
16. Proctor, R. W., & Reeve, T. G. (Eds.). (1990). Stimulus-response compatibility: An integrated perspective. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
17. Schubö, A., Aschersleben, G., & Prinz, W. (2001). Interactions between perception and action in a reaction task with overlapping S-R assignments. Psychological Research/Psychologische Forschung, 65, 145-157.
18. Schubö, A., Prinz, W., & Aschersleben, G. (2004). Perceiving while acting: Action affects perception. Psychological Research/ Psychologische Forschung, 68, 208-215.
19. Spivey, M. J., Grosjean, M., & Knoblich, G. (2005). Continuous attraction toward phonological competitors. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102, 10393 10398.
20. Wohlschläger, A. (2000). Visual motion priming by invisible actions. Vision Research, 40, 925-930.