Reinforcement of gametic isolation in drosophila

PLoS Biology

Volumn 8, Issue 3, 2010, Pages

  Matute, Daniel R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DROSOPHILA; DROSOPHILA SANTOMEA; DROSOPHILA YAKUBA; GAMETE; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; MOLECULAR HYBRIDIZATION; NONHUMAN; ORGANISM HYBRIDIZATION; REPRODUCTIVE ISOLATION; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR; SEXUALITY; SPECIES DIFFERENTIATION; AFRICA; ANIMAL; EVOLUTION; FEMALE; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETICS; GERM CELL; HYBRIDIZATION; MALE; METABOLISM; PHYSIOLOGY; SPERMATOZOON;

ANIMALIA; DROSOPHILA SANTOMEA; DROSOPHILA YAKUBA;

AFRICA; ANIMALS; DROSOPHILA; EVOLUTION; FEMALE; GENETIC SPECIATION; GERM CELLS; HYBRIDIZATION, GENETIC; MALE; SELECTION, GENETIC; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL; SPERMATOZOA;

EID: 77950564670     PISSN: 15449173     EISSN: 15457885     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000341     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Servedio MR, Noor MA (2003) The role of reinforcement in speciation: theory and data. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 34: 339-364.
2. Coyne JA, Orr HA (2004) Speciation. Sunderland (Massachusetts): Sinauer Associates. 545 p.
3. Noor MA (1995) Speciation driven by natural selection in Drosophila. Nature 375:674-675.
4. Dobzhansky TG (1940) Speciation as a stage in evolutionary divergence. AmNat 74: 312-321.
5. Gerhardt HC (1994) Reproductive character displacement of female matechoice in the grey treefrog, Hyla chrysoscelis. Anim Behav 47: 959-969.
6. Rundle HD, Schluter D (1998) Reinforcement of stickleback mate preferences: sympatry breeds contempt. Evolution 52: 200-208.
7. Haavie J, Borge T, Bures S, Garamszegi LZ, Lampe HM, et al. (2004) Flycatcher song in allopatry and sympatry-convergence, divergence and reinforcement. J Evol Biol 17: 227-237.
8. Jaenike J, Dyer KA, Cornish C, Minhas MS (2006) Asymmetrical reinforcement and Wolbachia infection in Drosophila. PLoS Biol 4: e325 doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0040325.
9. Servedio MR (2001) Beyond reinforcement: the evolution of premating isolationby direct selection on preferences and postmating, prezygotic incompatibilities. Evolution 55: 1909-1920.
10. Servedio MR (2004) The what and why of research on reinforcement. PLoS Bio l2: e420 doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0020420.
11. Grant V (1966) The selective origin of incompatibility barriers in the plant Gilia. Am Nat 100: 99-118.
12. Coyne JA (1974) The evolutionary origin of hybrid inviability. Evolution 28:505-506.
13. Howard DJ (1999) Conspecific sperm and pollen precedence and speciation. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 30: 109-132.
14. Palumbi SR (2009) Speciation and the evolution of gamete recognition genes: pattern and process. Heredity 102: 66-76.
15. Lorch PD, Servedio MR (2007) The evolution of conspecific gamete precedence and its effect on reinforcement. J Evol Biol 20: 937-949.
16. Lachaise D, Harry M, Solignac M, Lemeunier F, Benassi V, et al. (2000) Evolutionary novelties in islands: Drosophila santomea, a new melanogaster sister species from São Tome. Proc Biol Sci 267: 1487-1495.
17. Llopart A, Lachaise D, Coyne JA (2005) Multilocus analysis of introgressionbetween two sympatric sister species of Drosophila: Drosophila yakuba and D.santomea. Genetics 171: 197-210.
18. Llopart A, Elwyn S, Lachaise D, Coyne JA (2002) Genetics of a difference in pigmentation between Drosophila yakuba and Drosophila santomea. Evolution 56:2262-2277.
19. Llopart A, Lachaise D, Coyne JA (2005) An anomalous hybrid zone in Drosophila. Evolution 59: 2602-2607.
20. Coyne JA, Kim SY, Chang AS, Lachaise D, Elwyn S (2002) Sexual isolation between two sibling species with overlapping ranges: Drosophila santomea and Drosophila yakuba. Evolution 56: 2424-2434.
21. Coyne JA, Elwyn S, Kim SY, Llopart A (2004) Genetic studies of two sisterspecies in the Drosophila melanogaster subgroup, D. yakuba and D. santomea. GenetRes 84: 11-26.
22. Chang AS (2004) Conspecific sperm precedence in sister species of Drosophilawith overlapping ranges. Evolution 58: 781-789.
23. Matute DR, Coyne JA (2009) Intrinsic reproductive isolation between two sister species of Drosophila. Evolution. E-pub ahead of print. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2009.00879.x.
24. Matute DR, Novak CJ, Coyne JA (2009) Thermal adaptation and extrinsicre productive isolation in two species of Drosophila. Evolution 63: 583-594.
25. Pinheiro J, Bates D (2000) Mixed-effects models in S and S-PLUS. New York(New York): Springer. 528 p.
26. Crawley MJ (1993) GLIM for ecologists. Oxford (United Kingdom): Blackwell Scientific Publications. 379 p.
27. Crawley MJ (2002) Statistical computing: an introduction to data analysis usingS-plus. Chichester (United Kingdom): Wiley. 761 p.
28. Wilson K, Hardy ICW (2002) Statistical analysis of sex ratios: an introduction. In: Hardy ICW, ed. Sex ratios: concepts and research methods. Cambridge(United Kingdom): Cambridge University Press;. pp 48-92.
29. Koopman KF (1950) Natural selection for reproductive isolation between Drosophila pseudoobscura and Drosophila persimilis. Evolution 4: 135-148.
30. Higgie M, Chenoweth S, Blows MW (2000) Natural selection and the reinforcement of mate recognition. Science 290: 519-520.
31. Coyne JA, Orr HA (1989) Patterns of speciation in Drosophila. Evolution 43:262-281.
32. Coyne JA, Orr HA (1997) ''Patterns of speciation in Drosophila'' revisited. Evolution 51: 295-202.
33. Howard DJ (1993) Reinforcement: origin, dynamics, and fate of an evolutionary hypothesis. In: Harrison RG, ed. Hybrid zones and the evolutionary process. Oxford (United Kingdom): Oxford University Press. pp 46-69.
34. Noor MA (1999) Reinforcement and other consequences of sympatry. Heredity 83: 503-508.
35. Albert A, Schluter D (2004) Reproductive character displacement of male stickleback mate preference: reinforcement or direct selection? Evolution 58:1099-1107.
36. Nosil P, Crespi B, Sandoval CP (2003) Reproductive isolation driven by the combined effects of ecological adaptation and reinforcement. Proc Biol Sci 270:1911-1918.
37. Geyer LB, Palumbi SR (2003) Reproductive character displacement and the genetics of gamete recognition in tropical sea urchins. Evolution 57: 1049-1060.
38. Lee YH, Vacquier VD (1992) The divergence of species-specific abalone spermlysins is promoted by positive Darwinian selection. Biol Bull 182: 97-104.
39. Lee YH, Ota T, Vacquier VD (1995) Positive selection is a general phenomenonin the evolution of abalone sperm lysin. Mol Biol Evol 12: 231-238.
40. Wullschleger EB, Wiehn J, Jokela J (2002) Reproductive character displacement between the closely related freshwater snails Lymnaea peregra and L. ovata. EvolEcol Res 4: 247-257.
41. Springer SA, Crespi BJ (2007) Adaptive gamete-recognition divergence in a hybridizing Mytilus population. Evolution 61: 772-783.
42. Slaughter C, McCartney MA, Yund PO (2008) Comparison of gamete compatibility between two blue mussel species in sympatry and in allopatry. Biol Bull 214: 57-66.
43. Marshall JL, Arnold ML, Howard DJ (2002) Reinforcement: the road not taken. Trends Ecol Evol 17: 558-563.
44. Nosil P, Crespi BJ (2006) Ecological divergence promotes the evolution of crypticre productive isolation. Proc Biol Sci 273: 991-997.
45. Coyne JA, Elwyn S, Rolán-Alvarez E (2005) Impact of experimental design on Drosophila sexual isolation studies: direct effects and comparison to field hybridization data. Evolution 59: 2588-2601.
46. Markow TA (2002) Female remating, operational sex ratio, and the arena of sexual selection in Drosophila. Evolution 56: 1725-1734.
47. Rosengrave P, Gemmel NJ, Metcalf V, McBride K, Montgomerie R (2008) Amechanism for cryptic female choice in chinook salmon. Behav Ecol 19:1179-1185.
48. Knowles LL, Markow TA (2001) Sexually antagonistic coevolution of a postmating prezygotic reproductive character in desert Drosophila. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 98: 8692-8696.
49. Knowles LL, Hernandez BB, Markow TA (2004) Exploring the consequences of postmating-prezygotic interactions between the sexes. Proc Biol Sci 271:S357-S359.
50. Calsbeek R, Bonneaud C (2008) Postcopulatory fertilization bias as a form of cryptic sexual selection. Evolution 62: 1137-1148.
51. Knowles LL, Hernandez BB, Markow TA (2004) Non-antagonistic interactions between the sexes revealed by the ecological consequences of reproductive traits. J Evol Biol 18: 156-161.