Exploring the consequences of postmating-prezygotic interactions between the sexes

Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences

Volumn 271, Issue SUPPL. 5, 2004, Pages

  Knowles, L Lacey ^a   Hernandez, B Brodie ^b   Markow, Therese A ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^b University of Arizona   (United States)

Author keywords

Antagonistic coevolution; Drosophila; Sexual conflict

Indexed keywords

ANTAGONISM; COEVOLUTION; INTRASPECIFIC INTERACTION; SEXUAL CONFLICT;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DESICCATION; DROSOPHILA; ECOLOGY; FEMALE; GENETIC VARIABILITY; MALE; MATING; NONHUMAN; POPULATION DIFFERENTIATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SEXUAL DEVELOPMENT; STRESS; ZYGOTE;

ANIMALIA; DIPTERA; DROSOPHILA; DROSOPHILIDAE;

EID: 3242893111     PISSN: 09628452     EISSN: 14712970     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2004.0192     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Chapman, T., Liddle, L. F., Kalb, J. M., Wolfher, M. F. & Partridge, L. 1995 Cost of mating in Drosophila melanogaster females is mediated by male accessory gland products. Nature 373, 241-244.
2. Civetta, A. & Clark, A. G. 2000 Correlated effects of sperm competition and postmating female mortality. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 97, 13 162-13 165.
3. Civetta, A. & Singh, R. S. 1995 High divergence of reproductive tract proteins and their association with postzygotic reproductive isolation in Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila virilis group species. J. Mol. Evol. 41, 1085-1095.
4. Eberhard, W. G. 1996 Female control: sexual selection by cryptic female choice. Princeton University Press.
5. Emlen, D. J. 2001 Costs and the diversification of exaggerated animal structures. Science 291, 1534-1536.
6. Fowler, K. & Partridge, L. 1989 A cost of mating in female fruitflies. Nature 338, 760-761.
7. Gavrilets, S. & Waxman, D. 2002 Sympatric speciation by sexual conflict. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 99, 10 533-10 538.
8. Holland, B. & Rice, W. R. 1999 Experimental removal of sexual selection reverses intersexual antagonistic coevolution and removes a reproductive load. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 96, 5083-5088.
9. Howard, D. J. 1999 Conspecific sperm and pollen precedence and speciation. A. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 30, 109-132.
10. Knowles, L. L. & Markow, T. A. 2001 Sexually antagonistic coevolution of a postmating-prezygotic reproductive character in desert Drosophila. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 98, 8692-8696.
11. Kurdziel, J. P. & Knowles, L. L. 2002 Mechanisms of morph determination in the marine amphipod Jassa: implications for the evolution of alternative male phenotypes. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 269, 1749-1754. (DOI 10.1098/rspb.2002.2089.)
12. Partridge, L. & Hurst, L. D. 1998 Sex and conflict. Science 281, 2003-2008.
13. Pitnick, S., Markow, T. & Spicer, G. S. 1997 Phylogenetic examination of female incorporation of ejaculate in Drosophila. Evolution 51, 833-845.
14. Pitnick, S., Markow, T. & Spicer, G. S. 1999 Evolution of multiple kinds of female sperm-storage organs in Drosophila. Evolution 53, 1804-1822.
15. Swanson, W. J., Clark, A. G., Waldrip-Dali, H. M., Wolfner, M. F. & Aquadro, C. F. 2001 Evolutionary EST analysis identifies rapidly evolving male reproductive proteins in Drosophila. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 98, 7375-7379.
16. Wolfner, M. F. 2002 The gifts that keep on giving: physiological functions and evolutionary dynamics of male seminal proteins in Drosophila. Heredity 88, 85-93.