Nonantagonistic interactions between the sexes revealed by the ecological consequences of reproductive traits

Journal of Evolutionary Biology

Volumn 18, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 156-161

  Lacey Knowles, L ^a   Brodie Hernandez, B ^b   Markow, T A ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^b The University of Arizona   (United States)

Author keywords

Antagonistic coevolution; Post mating prezygotic interactions; Sexual selection

Indexed keywords

LIFE HISTORY; REPRODUCTION; SEXUAL CONFLICT; SEXUAL SELECTION;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; DROSOPHILA; ECOLOGY; EVOLUTION; FEMALE; FEMALE GENITAL SYSTEM; GENETICS; HISTOLOGY; MALE; MALE GENITAL SYSTEM; PHYSIOLOGY; REPRODUCTION;

ANIMALS; DROSOPHILA; ECOLOGY; EVOLUTION; FEMALE; GENITALIA, FEMALE; GENITALIA, MALE; MALE; REPRODUCTION;

ARENA;

EID: 12744269281     PISSN: 1010061X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2004.00779.x     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Andrés, J.A. & Arnqvist, G. 2001. Genetic divergence of the seminal signal-receptor system in houseflies: the footprints of sexually antagonistic coevolution? Proc. R. Soc. London B 268:399-405.
2. Bertram, M.J., Neubaum, D.M. & Wolfner, M.F. 1996. Localization of the Drosophila male accessory gland protein Acp36DE in the mated female suggests a role in sperm storage. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 26:971-980.
3. Breitmeyer, C.M. & Markow, T.A. 1988. Resource availability and population size in cactophilic Drosophila. Funct. Ecol. 12:14-21.
4. Civetta, A. & Clark, A.G. 2000. Correlated effects of sperm competition and postmating female mortality. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97:13162-13165.
5. Civetta, A. & Singh, R.S. 1995. High divergence of reproductive tract proteins and their association with postzygotic reproductive isolation in Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila virilis group species. J. Mol. Evol. 41:1085-1095.
6. Clark, A.G. & Begun, D.J. 1998. Female genotypes affect sperm displacement in Drosophila. Genetics 149:1487-1493.
7. Clark, A.G., Dermitzakis, E.T. & Civetta, A. 2000. Nontransitivity of sperm precedence in Drosophila. Evolution 54:1030-1035.
8. Cordero, C. & Eberhard, W.G. 2003. Female choice of sexually antagonistic male adaptations: a critical review of some current research. J. Evol. Biol. 16:1-6.
9. Eberhard, W.G. 1996. Female Control: Sexual Selection by Cryptic Female Choice. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton.
10. Eberhard, W.G. & Cordero, C. 2003. Sexual conflict and female choice. Trends Ecol. Evol. 18:438-439.
11. Emlen, D.J. 2001. Costs and the diversification of exaggerated animal structures. Science 291:1534-1536.
12. Fowler, K. & Partridge, L. 1989. A cost of mating in female fruitflies. Nature 338:760-761.
13. Fu, P., Neff, B.D. & Gross, M.R. 2001. Tactic-specific success in sperm competition. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 268:1105-1112.
14. Gavrilets, S. & Waxman, D. 2002. Sympatric speciation by sexual conflict. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99:10533-10538.
15. Gross, M.R. & Charnov, E.L. 1980. Alternative male life histories in bluegill sunfish. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 77:693-6940.
16. Hadley, N.F. 1994. Water Relations of Terrestrial Arthropods. Academic Press, San Diego, CA.
17. Heed, W.B. 1978. Ecology and genetics of Sonoran Desert Drosophila. In: Ecological Genetics at the Interface (P. Brussard, ed.), pp. 109-126. Springer, New York.
18. Holland, B. & Rice, W.R. 1999. Experimental removal of sexual selection reverses intersexual antagonistic coevolution and removes a reproductive load. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96:5083-5088.
19. Knowles, L.L. & Markow, T.A. 2001. Sexually antagonistic coevolution of a postmating-prezygotic reproductive character in desert Drosophila. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98:8692-8696.
20. Knowles, L.L., Hernandez, B.B. & Markow, T.A. 2004. Exploring the consequences of postmating-prezygotic interactions between the sexes. Proc. Royal. Soc. Lond. B (Suppl), DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2004.0192.
21. Kubli, E. 1996. The Drosophila sex peptide: A peptide pheromone involved in reproduction. In: Advances in Developmental Biochemistry, Vol. 4 (P. Wasserman, ed.), pp. 99-129. JAI Press, New York.
22. Kurdziel, J.P. & Knowles, L.L. 2002. Mechanisms of morph determination in the marine amphipod Jassa: implications for the evolution of alternative phenotypes. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 269:1749-1754.
23. Markow, T.A. & Castrezana, S. 2000. Dispersal in cactophilic Drosophila. Oikos 89:378-386.
24. Partridge, L. & Hurst, L.D. 1998. Sex and conflict. Science 281: 2003-2008.
25. Pitnick, S., Markow, T. & Spicer, G.S. 1999. Evolution of multiple kinds of female sperm-storage organs in Drosophila. Evolution 53:1804-1822.
26. Rice, W.R. 1996. Sexually antagonistic male adaptation triggered by experimental arrest of female evolution. Nature 381:232-234.
27. Richmond, R.C., Nielsen, K.M., Brady, J.P. & Snella, E.M. 1990. Physiology, biochemistry and moldculr biology of the Est-6 locus in Drosophila melanogaster. In: Ecological and Evolutionary Genetics of Drosophila (J. S. F. Barker, W. T. Starmer & R. J. MacIntyre, eds), pp. 273-289. Plenum Press, New York.
28. Rowe, L., Cameron, E. & Day, T. 2003. Detecting sexually antagonistic coevolution with population crosses. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 270:2009-2016.
29. Swanson, W.J., Clark, A.G., Waldrip-Dali, H.M., Wolfner, M.F. & Aquadro, C.F. 2001. Evolutionary EST analysis identifies rapidly evolving male reproductive proteins in Drosophila. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98:7375-7379.
30. Wolfner, M.F. 2002. The gifts that keep on giving: physiological functions and evolutionary dynamics of male seminal proteins in Drosophila. Heredity. 88:85-93.