Intrinsic reproductive isolation between two sister species of drosophila

Evolution

Volumn 64, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 903-920

  Matute, Daniel R ^a   Coyne, Jerry A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

Hybrid inviability; Hybrid sterility; Isolating barriers; Postmating isolation; Speciation

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; ANTAGONISM; CONSPECIFIC; FLY; GENE FLOW; HATCHING; HYBRID; ISOLATION EFFECT; MATING SUCCESS; REPRODUCTIVE ISOLATION; SEXUAL SELECTION; SPECIATION (BIOLOGY); VOLCANIC ISLAND;

SAO TOME AND PRINCIPE;

DROSOPHILA SANTOMEA; DROSOPHILA YAKUBA;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; DROSOPHILA; FEMALE; FERTILITY; FERTILIZATION; GENE FLOW; HYBRIDIZATION; LONGEVITY; MALE; OOCYTE; OVIPARITY; PHYSIOLOGY; REPRODUCTION; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR; SPECIES DIFFERENTIATION;

ANIMALS; DROSOPHILA; FEMALE; FERTILITY; FERTILIZATION; GENE FLOW; GENETIC SPECIATION; HYBRIDIZATION, GENETIC; LONGEVITY; MALE; OVIPARITY; OVUM; REPRODUCTION; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL;

EID: 77954976914     PISSN: 00143820     EISSN: 15585646     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2009.00879.x     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Bachtrog D, Thornton K, Clark A, Andolfatto P. Extensive introgression of mitochondrial DNA relative to nuclear genes in the Drosophila yakuba species group. Evolution 2006, 60:292-302.
2. Birkhead T R, Pizzari T. Postcopulatory sexual selection. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2002, 3:262-273.
3. Chang A S. Conspecific sperm precedence in sister species of Drosophila with overlapping ranges. Evolution 2004, 58:781-789.
4. Chapman T, Liddle L F, Kalb J M, Wolfner M F, Partridge L. Cost of mating in Drosophila melanogaster females is mediated by male accessory gland products. Nature 1995, 373:241-244.
5. Coyne J A, Orr H A. Patterns of speciation in Drosophila. Evolution 1989, 43:362-381.
6. Coyne J A, Orr H A. Speciation 2004, Sinauer, Sunderland, MA
7. Coyne J A, Kim S Y, Chang A S, Lachaise D, Elwyn S. Sexual isolation between two siblings with overlapping ranges: Drosophila santomea and D. yakuba. Evolution 2002, 56:2424-2434.
8. Coyne J A, Elwyn S, Kim S Y, Llopart A. Genetic studies of two sister species in the Drosophila melanogaster subgroup, D. yakuba and D. santomea. Genet. Res. 2004, 84:11-26.
9. Coyne J A, Elwyn S, Rolan-Alvarez E L. Impact of experimental design on Drosophila sexual isolation studies: direct effects and comparison to field hybridization data. Evolution 2005, 59:2588-2601.
10. Crawley M J. GLIM for ecologists 1993, Blackwell Scientific Publications, London
11. Crawley M J. Statistical computing: an introduction to data analysis using S-plus 2002, Wiley, Chichester, U.K
12. Dobzhansky T. Genetics and the Origin of Species 1937, Columbia Univ. Press, NewYork, NY
13. Eberhard W G. Female Control: sexual selection by Cryptic Female Choice 1996, Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ
14. Evans J P, Zane L, Francescato S, Pilastro A. Directional postcopulatory sexual selection revealed by artificial insemination. Nature 2003, 421:360-363.
15. Holland B, Rice W R. Experimental removal of sexual selection reverses intersexual antagonistic coevolution and removes a reproductive load. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1999, 96:5083-5088.
16. Hoffmann A A, Turelli M. Cytoplasmic incompatibility in insects. Influential Passengers: inherited Microorganisms and Arthropod Reproduction 1997, 42-80. O'Neill S L, Werren J HHoffmann A A. Pp.,eds., Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, U.K.
17. Hunter F M, Birkhead T R. Sperm viability and sperm competition in insects. Curr. Biol. 2002, 12:121-123.
18. Howard R D, Martens R S, Innis S A, Drnevich J M, Hale J. Mate choice and mate competition influence male body size in Japanese medaka. Anim. Behav. 1998, 55:1151-1163.
19. Knowles L L, Markow T A. Sexually antagonistic coevolution of a postmating-prezygotic reproductive character in desert Drosophila. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2005, 98:8692-8696.
20. Knowles L L, Hernandez B B, Markow T A. Exploring the consequences of postmating-prezygotic interactions between the sexes. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 2001, 271:S357-S359.
21. Lachaise D, Cariou M L, David J R, Lemeunier F, Tsacas L, Ashburner M. Historical biogeography of the Drosophila melanogaster species subgroup. Evol. Biol. 1988, 22:159-225.
22. Lachaise D, Harry M, Solignac M, Lemeunier F, Bénassi V, Cariou M L. Evolutionary novelties in islands: drosophila santomea, a new melanogaster sister species from São Tomé. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 2000, 267:1487-1495.
23. Llopart A, Elwyn S, Coyne J A. Pigmentation and mate choice in Drosophila melanogaster. Nature 2002, 419:360.
24. Llopart A, Lachaise D, Coyne J A. Multilocus analysis of introgression between two sympatric sister species of Drosophila: drosophila yakuba and D. santomea. Genetics 2005a, 171:197-210.
25. Llopart A, Lachaise D, Coyne J A. An anomalous hybrid zone in Drosophila. Evolution 2005b, 59:2602-2607.
26. Lott S E, Kreitman M, Palsson A, Alekseeva E, Ludwig M Z. Canalization of segmentation and its evolution in Drosophila. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104:10926-10931.
27. Markow T A, Coppola A, Watts T. How Drosophila males make eggs: it's elemental. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 2001, 268:1527-1532.
28. Mas F, Jallon J M. Sexual isolation and cuticular hydrocarbon differences between Drosophila santomea and Drosophila yakuba. J. Chem. Ecol. 2005, 31:2747-2752.
29. Matute D M, Novak C J, Coyne J A. Temperature-based extrinsic reproductive isolation in two species of Drosophila. Evolution 2009, 63:595-612.
30. Mayr E. Systematics and the origin of species 1942, Columbia Univ. Press, New York, NY
31. Moehring A J, Llopart A, Elwyn S, Coyne J A, Mackay T F C. The genetic basis of postzygotic reproductive isolation between Drosophila santomea and D. yakuba due to hybrid male sterility. Genetics 2006a, 173:225-233.
32. Parker G A. Sperm competition and its evolutionary consequences in the insects. Biol. Rev. 1970, 45:525-567.
33. Pinheiro J, Bates D. Mixed-effects models in S and S-PLUS 2000, Springer, New York, NY
34. Pitnick S, García-González F. Harm to females increases with male body size in Drosophila melanogaster. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 2002, 269:1821-1828.
35. Price C S C, Kim C H, Gronlund C J, Coyne J A. Cryptic reproductive isolation in the Drosophila simulans species complex. Evolution 2001, 55:81-92.
36. R: A language and environment for statistical computing, version 2.6.1. 2005, http://www.R-project.org, R Development Core Team, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0, Available at, Accessed November 26, 2007
37. Ravi Ram K, Wolfner M F. Seminal influences: Drosophila Acps and the molecular interplay between male and female during reproduction. Integr. Comp. Biol. 2007, 47:427-445.
38. Rice W R. Sexually antagonistic male adaptation triggered by experimental arrest of female evolution. Nature 1996, 381:232-234.
39. Rice W R, Holland B. The enemies within: intergenomic conflict, interlocus context evolution (IEC), and the intraspecific Red Queen. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 1997, 41:1-10.
40. Sheldon B C. Sexually transmitted disease in birds: occurrence and evolutionary significance. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B. 1993, 339:491-497.
41. Sokal R R, Rohlf F J. Biometry 1995, 3rd Edition, W. H. Freeman and Co., San Francisco, CA
42. Sonnenblick B P. The early embryology of Drosophila melanogaster. The biology of Drosophila 1950, 62-165. Demerec M. ed., John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY
43. Werren J H. Biology of Wolbachia. Ann. Rev. Entomol. 1997, 42:587-609.
44. Wilson K, Hardy I C W. Statistical analysis of sex ratios: an introduction. Sex ratios: concepts and research methods 2002, 48-92. Hardy I C W, ed., Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, U.K.