Is direct stenting superior to stenting with predilation in patients treated with percutaneous coronary intervention? Results from a meta-analysis of 24 randomised controlled trials

Heart

Volumn 96, Issue 8, 2010, Pages 588-594

  Piscione, Federico ^a   Piccolo, Raffaele ^a   Cassese, Salvatore ^a   Galasso, Gennaro ^a   D'Andrea, Claudia ^a   De Rosa, Roberta ^a   Chiariello, Massimo ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NAPLES FEDERICO II   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; CLINICAL TRIAL; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFT; CORONARY STENT; FIBRINOLYTIC THERAPY; HEART DEATH; HEART INFARCTION; HUMAN; META ANALYSIS; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY CONTROL; REVASCULARIZATION; REVIEW; SAPHENOUS VEIN GRAFT; STENT THROMBOSIS; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UNSTABLE ANGINA PECTORIS;

ANGIOPLASTY, TRANSLUMINAL, PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY; BALLOON DILATATION; BIAS (EPIDEMIOLOGY); COMBINED MODALITY THERAPY; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; STENTS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 77950550243     PISSN: 13556037     EISSN: 1468201X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/hrt.2009.183277     Document Type: Review

References (53)

1. Serruys PW, Kutryk MJ, Ong AT. Coronary-artery stents. N Engl J Med 2006;354:483-495
2. Barbato E, Marco J, Wijns W. Direct stenting. Eur Heart J 2003;24:394-403.
3. Rogers C, Parikh S, Seifert P, et al. Endogenous cell seeding. Remnant endothelium after stenting enhances vascular repair. Circulation 1996;94:2909-2914
4. Maclure M, Willett WC. Misinterpretation and misuse of the kappa statistic. Am J Epidemiol 1987;126:161-169
5. Bradburn MJ, Deeks JJ, Berlin JA, et al. Much ado about nothing: a comparison of the performance of meta-analytical methods with rare events. Stat Med 2007;26:53-77.
6. Sweeting MJ, Sutton AJ, Lambert PC. What to add to nothing? Use and avoidance of continuity corrections in meta-analysis of sparse data. Stat Med 2004;23:1351-1375
7. Mantel N, Haenszel W. Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease. J Natl Cancer Inst 1959;22:719-748
8. DerSimonian R, Laird N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 1986;7:177-188
9. Dickersin K, Berlin JA. Meta-analysis: state-of-the-science. Epidemiol Rev 1992;14:154-176
10. Higgins JP, Thompson SG. Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med 2002;21:1539-1558
11. Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, et al. Measuring inconsistency in metaanalyses. BMJ 2003;327:557-560
12. Begg CB, Mazumdar M. Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias. Biometrics 1994;50:1088-1101
13. Biondi-Zoccai GG, Abbate A, Agostoni P, et al. Long-term benefits of an early invasive management in acute coronary syndromes depend on intracoronary stenting and aggressive antiplatelet treatment: a metaregression. Am Heart J 2005;149:504-511
14. Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration. BMJ 2009;339:b2700.
15. Airoldi F, Di Mario C, Gimelli G, et al. A randomized comparison of direct stenting versus stenting with predilatation in native coronary artery disease: results from the multicentric Crosscut study. J Invasive Cardiol 2003;15:1-5.
16. Elbaz M, El Mokhtar E, Khalife K, et al. Is direct coronary stenting the best strategy for long-term outcome? Results of the multicentric randomized benefit evaluation of direct coronary stenting (BET) study. Am Heart J 2002;144:E7.
17. Brueck M, Scheinert D, Wortmann A, et al. Direct coronary stenting versus predilatation followed by stent placement. Am J Cardiol 2002;90:1187-1192
18. Balducelli M, Varani E, Vecchi G, et al. CK TEST Investigators. Direct coronary stenting versus stenting with balloon pre-dilation: incidence of enzyme release and follow-up results of a multicentre, prospective, randomized study. The CK and Troponin I Estimation in direct STenting (CK TEST) trial. Minerva cardioangiol 2007;55:281-289
19. Wijns W, Verheye S, Manoharan G, et al. CONVERTIBLE investigators. Angiographic, intravascular ultrasound, and fractional flow reserve evaluation of direct stenting vs. conventional stenting using BeStent2 in a multicentre randomized trial. Eur Heart J 2005;26:1852-1859
20. Cuisset T, Hamilos M, Melikian N, et al. Direct stenting for stable angina pectoris is associated with reduced periprocedural microcirculatory injury compared with stenting after pre-dilation. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008;51:1060-1065
21. Danzi GB, Capuano C, Fiocca L, et al. Stent implantation without predilation in patients with a single, noncalcified coronary artery lesion. Am J Cardiol 1999;84:1250-3, A8.
22. Tan HC, Lim YT, Rosli TL, et al. Direct stenting compared to conventional stenting in Diabetic Patients Undergoing Elective Angioplasty for Coronary Artery Disease (DECIDE): a multicenter, open label, randomized, controlled efficacy study. Am Heart J 2004;148:1007-1011
23. Gasior M, Gierlotka M, Lekston A, et al. Comparison of outcomes of direct stenting versus stenting after balloon predilation in patients with acute myocardial infarction (DIRAMI). Am J Cardiol 2007;100:798-805.
24. Brito FS Jr, Caixeta AM, Perin MA, et al. DIRECT Study Investigators. Comparison of direct stenting versus stenting with predilation for the treatment of selected coronary narrowings. Am J Cardiol 2002;89:115-120
25. Ballarino MA, Moreyra E Jr, Damonte A, et al. Multicenter randomized comparison of direct vs. conventional stenting: the DIRECTO trial. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2003;58:434-440
26. Martinez-Elbal L, Ruiz-Nodar JM, Zueco J, et al. Direct coronary stenting versus stenting with balloon pre-dilation: immediate and follow-up results of a multicentre, prospective, randomized study. The DISCO trial. DIrect Stenting of COronary Arteries. Eur Heart J 2002;23:633-640
27. Hoffmann R, Takimoglu-Boerekci M, Langenberg R, et al. Randomized comparison of direct stenting with predilatation followed by stenting on vessel trauma and restenosis. Am Heart J 2004;147:E13.
28. IJsselmuiden AJ, Serruys PW, Scholte A, et al. Direct coronary stent implantation does not reduce the incidence of in-stent restenosis or major adverse cardiac events: six month results of a randomized trial. Eur Heart J 2003;24:421-429
29. Mehilli J, Kastrati A, Dirschinger J, et al. Intracoronary stenting and angiographic results: restenosis after direct stenting versus stenting with predilation in patients with symptomatic coronary artery disease (ISAR-DIRECT trial). Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2004;61:190-195
30. Kovar LI, Monrad ES, Sherman W, et al. A randomized trial of stenting with or without balloon predilation for the treatment of coronary artery disease. Am Heart J 2001;142:E9.
31. Loubeyre C, Morice MC, Lefevre T, et al. A randomized comparison of direct stenting with conventional stent implantation in selected patients with acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002;39:15-21.
32. Ormiston JA, Webster MW, Ruygrok PN, et al. A randomized study of direct coronary stent delivery compared with stenting after predilatation: the NIR future trial. On behalf of the NIR Future Trial Investigators. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2000;50:377-81;discussion 82-83
33. Ozdemir R, Sezgin AT, Barutcu I, et al. Comparison of direct stenting versus conventional stent implantation on blood flow in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Angiology 2006;57:453-458
34. Baim DS, Flatley M, Caputo R, et al. Comparison of PRE-dilatation vs direct stenting in coronary treatment using the Medtronic AVE S670 Coronary Stent System (the PREDICT trial). Am J Cardiol 2001;88:1364-1369
35. Sabatier R, Hamon M, Zhao QM, et al. Could direct stenting reduce no-reflow in acute coronary syndromes? A randomized pilot study. Am Heart J 2002;143:1027-1032
36. Le Breton H, Boschat J, Commeau P, et al. Stent Without Balloon Predilation (SWIBAP) Study Group. Randomised comparison of coronary stenting with and without balloon predilatation in selected patients. Heart 2001;86:302-308
37. Dawkins KD, Chevalier B, Suttorp MJ, et al. Effectiveness of "direct" stenting without balloon predilatation (from the Multilink Tetra Randomised European Direct Stent Study [TRENDS]). Am J Cardiol 2006;97:316-321
38. Serruys PW, IJsselmuiden S, Hout B, et al. Direct stenting with the Bx VELOCITY balloon-expandable stent mounted on the Raptor rapid exchange delivery system versus predilatation in a European randomized Trial: the VELVET trial. Int J Cardiovasc Intervent 2003;5:17-26.
39. Ormiston JA, Mahmud E, Turco MA, et al. Direct stenting with the TAXUS Liberté Drug-Eluting Stent. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2008;1:150-160
40. Moses JW, Weisz G, Mishkel G, et al. The SIRIUS-DIRECT trial: a multi-center study of direct stenting using the sirolimus-eluting stent in patients with de novo native coronary artery lesions. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2007;70:505-512
41. Katritsis DG, Korovesis S, Karvouni E, et al. Direct versus predilatation drug-eluting stenting: a randomized clinical trial. J Invasive Cardiol 2006;18:475-479
42. Burzotta F, Trani C, Prati F, et al. Comparison of outcomes (early and six- month) of direct stenting with conventional stenting (a meta-analysis of ten randomized trials). Am J Cardiol 2003;91:790-796
43. Nageh T, Thomas MR, Sherwood RA, et al. Direct stenting may limit myocardial injury during percutaneous coronary intervention. J Invasive Cardiol 2003;15:115-118
44. Cantor WJ, Newby LK, Christenson RH, et al. Prognostic significance of elevated troponin I after percutaneous coronary intervention. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002;39:1738-1744
45. Nienhuis MB, Ottervanger JP, Bilo HJ, et al. Prognostic value of troponin after elective percutaneous coronary intervention: a meta-analysis. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2008;71:318-324
46. Bahrmann P, Figulla HR, Wagner M, et al. Detection of coronary microembolisation by Doppler ultrasound during percutaneous coronary interventions. Heart 2005;91:1186-1192
47. Kralev S, Poerner TC, Basorth D, et al. Side branch occlusion after coronary stent implantation in patients presenting with ST-elevation myocardial infarction: clinical impact and angiographic predictors. Am Heart J 2006;151:153-157
48. Capozzolo C, Piscione F, De Luca G, et al. Direct coronary stenting: effect on coronary blood flow, immediate and late clinical results. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2001;53:464-473
49. Morice MC, Serruys PW, Sousa JE, et al. A randomized comparison of a sirolimuseluting stent with a standard stent for coronary revascularization. N Engl J Med 2002;346:1773-1780
50. Grube E, Silber S, Hauptmann KE, et al. TAXUS I: six- and twelve-month results from a randomized, double-blind trial on a slow-release paclitaxel-eluting stent for de novo coronary lesions. Circulation 2003;107:38-42.
51. Moses JW, Leon MB, Popma JJ, et al. Sirolimus-eluting stents versus standard stents in patients with stenosis in a native coronary artery. N Engl J Med 2003;349:1315-1323
52. Stone GW, Ellis SG, Cox DA, et al. A polymer-based, paclitaxel-eluting stent in patients with coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med 2004;350:221-231
53. Leborgne L, Cheneau E, Pichard A, et al. Effect of direct stenting on clinical outcome in patients treated with percutaneous coronary intervention on saphenous vein graft. Am Heart J 2003;146:501-506