Angiographic, intravascular ultrasound, and fractional flow reserve evaluation of direct stenting vs. conventional stenting using BeStent2 in a multicentre randomized trial

European Heart Journal

Volumn 26, Issue 18, 2005, Pages 1852-1859

  Wijns, William ^a   Verheye, Stefan ^b   Manoharan, Ganesh ^a   Werner, Gerald S ^c   Grube, Eberhard ^d   De Bruyne, Bernard ^a   Koolen, Jacques ^e   Hamm, Christian W ^f   Medina, Alfonso ^g   Bech, Jan Willem ^h   De Feyter, Pim J ⁱ  

^a OLV HOSPITAL   (Belgium)

^b MIDDELHEIM HOSPITAL   (Belgium)

^c FRIEDRICH SCHILLER UNIVERSITY JENA   (Germany)

^d Heart Center Siegburg   (Germany)

^e CATHARINA HOSPITAL   (Netherlands)

^f KERCKHOFF HEART CENTER   (Germany)

^g HOSPITAL UNIVERSITARIO DE GRAN CANARIA DR NEGRÍN   (Spain)

^h REINIER DE GRAAF HOSPITAL   (Netherlands)

ⁱ ERASMUS MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Angioplasty; Direct stenting; FFR; IVUS; Restenosis

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ARTERY DIAMETER; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY BLOOD FLOW; CORONARY STENT; FEMALE; FIELD FLOW FRACTIONATION; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IN-STENT RESTENOSIS; INTRAVASCULAR ULTRASOUND; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL ASSESSMENT; MULTICENTER STUDY; ONLINE ANALYSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZATION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SINGLE BLIND PROCEDURE; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

ANGIOPLASTY, TRANSLUMINAL, PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY; BLOOD FLOW VELOCITY; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY CIRCULATION; CORONARY RESTENOSIS; CORONARY STENOSIS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SINGLE-BLIND METHOD; STENTS; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, INTERVENTIONAL;

EID: 24344509919     PISSN: 0195668X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehi286     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Barbato E, Marco J, Wijns W. Direct stenting. Eur Heart J 2003;24:394-403.
2. Rogers C, Parikh S, Seifert P, Edelman ER. Endogenous cell seeding. Remnant endothelium after stenting enhances vascular repair. Circulation 1996;94:2909-2914.
3. Briguori C, Sheiban I, De Gregorio J, Anzuini A, Montorfano M, Pagnotta P, Marsico F, Leonardo F, Di Mario C, Colombo A. Direct coronary stenting without predilatation. J Am Coll Cardiol 1999;34:1910-1915.
4. Taylor AJ, Broughton A, Federman J, Walton A, Keighley C, Haikerwal D, Krawczyszyn M, Shaw J, Goods C. Efficacy and safety of direct stenting in coronary angioplasty. J Invasive Cardiol 2000;12:560-565.
5. Chan AW, Carere RG, Solankhi N, Dodek A, Webb JG. Coronary stenting without predilatation in a broad spectrum of clinical and angiographic situations. J Invasive Cardiol 2000;12:75-79.
6. Wilson SH, Berger PB, Mathew V, Bell MR, Garratt KN, Rihal CS, Bresnahan JF, Grill DE, Melby S, Holmes DR Jr. Immediate and late outcomes after direct stent implantation without balloon predilatation. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000;35:937-943.
7. Figulla HR, Mudra H, Reifart N, Werner GS. Direct coronary stenting without predilatation. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1998;43:245-252.
8. Hamon M, Richardeau Y, Lecluse E, Saloux E, Sabatier R, Agostini D, Filmont JE, Grollier G, Potier JC. Direct coronary stenting without balloon predilation in acute coronary syndromes. Am Heart J 1999;138:55-59.
9. Pentousis D, Guerin Y, Funck F, Zheng H, Toussaint M, Corcos T, Favereau X. Direct stent implantation without predilatation using the MultiLink stent. Am J Cardiol 1998;82:1437-1440.
10. De Feyter PJ, Kay P, Disco C, Serruys PW. Reference chart derived from post-stent-implantation intravascular ultrasound predictors of 6-month expected restenosis on quantitative cornary angiography. Circulation 1999;100:1777-1783.
11. Hanekamp CEE, Koolen JJ, Pijls NHJ, Michels HR, Bonnier HJ. Comparison of quantitative coronary angiography, intravascular ultrasound, and coronary pressure measurement to assess optimum stent deployment. Circulation 1999;99:1015-1021.
12. Serruys PW, Kay IP, Disco C, Deshpande NV, de Feyter PJ. Periprocedural quantitative coronary angiography after Palmaz-Schatz stent implantation predicts the restenosis rate at six months: results of a meta-analysis of the BElgian NEtherlands Stent study (BENESTENT) I, BENESTENT II Pilot, BENESTENT II and MUSIC trials. J Am Coll Cardiol 1999;34:1067-1074.
13. Baim DS, Flatley M, Caputo R, O'Shaughnessy C, Low R, Fanelli C, Popma J, Fitzgerald P, Kuntz R. Comparison of PRE-dilatation vs direct stenting in coronary treatment using the Medtronic AVE S670 Coronary Stent System (the PREDICT trial). Am J Cardiol 2001;88:1364-1369.
14. Martinez-Ebal L, Ruiz-Nodar JM, Zueco J, Lopez-Minguez JR, Moreu J, Calvo I, Ramirez JA, Alonso M, Vazquez N, Lezaun R, Rodriguez C. Direct coronary stenting versus stenting with balloon predilation: immediate and follow-up results of a multicentre, prospective, randomized study. (The DISCO trial). Eur Heart J 2002;23:633-640.
15. Ijsselmuiden AAJ, Serruys PW, Scholte A, Kiemeneij F, Slagboom T, vd Wieken LR, Tangelder GJ, Laarman GJ. Direct coronary stent implantation does not reduce the incidence of in-stent restenosis or major adverse cardiac events. Eur Heart J 2003;24:421-429.
16. Kuntz RE, Safian RD, Carrozza JP, Fishman RF, Mansour M, Baim DS. The importance of acute luminal diameter in determining restenosis after coronary atherectomy or stenting. Circulation 1992;86:1827-1835.
17. Kasaoka S, Tobis JM, Akiyama T, Reimers B, Di Mario C, Wong ND, Colombo A. Angiographic and intravascular ultrasound predictors of in-stent restenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 1998;32:1630-1635.
18. Kobayashi Y, De Gregorio J, Kobayashi N, Akiyama T, Reimers B, Finci L, Di Mario C, Colombo A. Stented segment length as an independent predictor of restenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 1999;34:651-659.
19. Kastrati A, Mehilli J, Dirschinger J, Dotzer F, Schuhlen H, Neumann FJ, Fleckenstein M, Pfafferott C, Seyfarth M, Schomig A. Intracoronary stenting and angiographic results: Strut thickness effect on restenosis outcome (ISAR-STEREO) trial. Circulation 2001;103:2816-2821.
20. Rogers C, Karnovsky MJ, Edelman ER et al. Inhibition of experimental neointimal hyperplasia and thrombosis depends on the type vascular injury and the site of drug administration. Circulation 1993;88:1215-1221.
21. Fischell TA, Derby G, Tse TM, Stadius ML. Coronary artery vasoconstriction routinely occurs after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Circulation 1988;78:1323-1333.
22. Pijls NHJ, Klauss V, Siebert U, Powers E, Takazawa K, Fearon WF, Escaned J, Tsurumi Y, Akasaka T, Samady H, De Bruyne B. Coronary pressure measurements after stenting predicts adverse events at follow-up. A multicentre registry. Circulation 2002;105:2950-2954.
23. Schofer J, Schlüter M, Gershlick AH, Wijns W, Garcia E, Schampaert E, Breithardt G; E-SIRIUS Investigators. Sirolimus-eluting stents for treatment of patients with long atherosclerotic lesions in small coronary arteries: double-blind, randomised controlled trial (E-SIRIUS). Lancet 2003;362:1093-1099.