Direct versus predilatation drug-eluting stenting: A randomized clinical trial

Journal of Invasive Cardiology

Volumn 18, Issue 10, 2006, Pages 475-479

  Katritsis, Demosthenes G ^a   Korovesis, Socrates ^a   Karvouni, Evangelia ^a   Giazitzoglou, Eleftherios ^a   Theodorou, Spyridoula ^a   Kourlaba, Georgia ^a   Panagiotakos, Demosthenes ^a   Voridis, Eutychios ^a  

^a Athens Euroclinic   (Greece)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PACLITAXEL; RAPAMYCIN;

ADULT; ANGIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY STENT; DRUG ELUTING STENT; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FEMALE; HEART MUSCLE REVASCULARIZATION; HUMAN; MALE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; VASODILATATION;

AGED; ANGIOPLASTY, BALLOON, CORONARY; ANGIOPLASTY, TRANSLUMINAL, PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY RESTENOSIS; CORONARY STENOSIS; DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEMS; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROBABILITY; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK ASSESSMENT; SIROLIMUS; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; STENTS; SURVIVAL RATE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VASCULAR PATENCY;

EID: 33749332014     PISSN: 10423931     EISSN: 15572501     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Baim DS, Flatley M, Caputo R, et al. PRE-Dilatation vs Direct Stenting In Coronary Treatment (PREDICT) Trial. Comparison of PRE-dilatation vs direct stenting in coronary treatment using the Medtronic AVE S670 Coronary Stent System (the PREDICT trial). Am J Cardiol 2001;88:1364-1369.
2. Le Breton H, Boschat J, Commeau P, et al. Stent Without Balloon Predilation (SWIBAP) Study Group. Randomised comparison of coronary stenting with and without balloon predilatation in selected patients. Heart 2001;86:302-308.
3. Brueck M, Scheinert D, Wortmann A, et al. Direct coronary stenting versus predilatation followed by stent placement. Am J Cardiol 2002;90:1187-1192.
4. Martinez-Elbal L, Ruiz-Nodar JM, Zueco J, et al. Direct coronary stenting versus stenting with balloon pre-dilation: Immediate and follow-up results of a multicentre, prospective, randomized study. The DISCO trial. DIrect Stenting of COronary Arteries. Eur Heart J 2002;23:633-640.
5. Elbaz M, El Mokhtar E, Khalife K, et al. Is direct coronary stenting the best strategy for long-term outcome? Results of the multicentric randomized benefit evaluation of direct coronary stenting (BET) study. Am Heart J 2002;144:E7.
6. Brito FS Jr, Caixeta AM, Perin MA, et al. DIRECT Study Investigators. Comparison of direct stenting versus stenting with predilation for the treatment of selected coronary narrowings. Am J Cardiol 2002;89:115-120.
7. Loubeyre C, Morice MC, Lefevre T, et al. A randomized comparison of direct stenting with conventional stent implantation in selected patients with acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002;39:15-21.
8. Ballarino MA, Moreyra E Jr, Damonte A, et al. Multicenter randomized comparison of direct vs. conventional stenting: The DIRECTO trial. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2003;58:434-440.
9. Tan HC, Lim YT, Rosli TL, et al. Direct stenting compared to conventional stenting in Diabetic Patients Undergoing Elective Angioplasty for Coronary Artery Disease (DECIDE): A multicenter, open label, randomized, controlled efficacy study. Am Heart J 2004;148:1007-1011.
10. Hoffmann R, Takimoglu-Boerekci M, Langenberg R, et al. Randomized comparison of direct stenting with predilatation followed by stenting on vessel trauma and restenosis. Am Heart J 2004;147:E13.
11. Mehilli J, Kastrati A, Dirschinger J, et al. Intracoronary stenting and angiographic results: Restenosis after direct stenting versus stenting with predilation in patients with symptomatic coronary artery disease (ISAR-DIRECT trial). Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2004;6:190-195.
12. IJsselmuiden AJ, Serruys PW, Scholte A, et al. Direct coronary stent implantation does not reduce the incidence of in-stent restenosis or major adverse cardiac events: Six month results of a randomized trial. Eur Heart J 2003;24:421-429.
13. Wijns W, Verheye S, Manoharan G, et al. Angiographic, intravascular ultrasound, and fractional flow reserve evaluation of direct stenting vs. conventional stenting using BeStent2 in a multicentre randomized trial. Eur Heart J 2005;26:1852-1859.
14. Burzotta F, Trani C, Prati F, et al. Comparison of outcomes (early and six-month) of direct stenting with conventional stenting (a meta-analysis of ten randomized trials). Am J Cardiol 2003;91:790-796.
15. Barbato E, Marco J, Wijns W. Direct stenting. Eur Heart J 2003;24:394-403.
16. Schofer J, Schluter M, Gershlick AH, et al for the E-SIRIUS Investigators. Sirolimus-eluting stents for treatment of patients with long atherosclerotic lesions in small coronary arteries: Double-blind, randomised controlled trial (E-SIRIUS). Lancet 2003;362:1093-1099.
17. Silber S, Hamburger J, Grube E, et al. Direct stenting with TAXUS stents seems to be as safe and effective as with predilatation. A post hoc analysis of TAXUS II. Herz 2004;29:171-180.
18. Munoz JS, Abizaid A, Albertal M, et al. Angiographic and volumetric intravascular ultrasound comparison between direct sirolimus-eluting stent implantation versus predilation. Am J Cardiol 2004;93:1522-1525.
19. Schluter M, Schofer J, Gershlick AH, et al for the E- and C-SIRIUS Investigators. Direct stenting of native de novo coronary artery lesions with the sirolimus-eluting stent: A post hoc subanalysis of the pooled E- and C-SIRIUS trials. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005;45:10-13.
20. Moses JW, Leon MB, Popma JJ, et al for the DIRECT Investigators. Direct stenting using the sirolimius-eluting Bx Velocity stent: procedural, clinical, and angiographic outcomes compared to a predilatation strategy. Late Breaking Clinical Trials. ACC 2004.
21. Kaski JC, Chen L, Chester M, Katritsis D. Rapid progression of coronary artery stenoses assessed by quantitative coronary angiography. Circulation 1955;92:2058-2065.
22. Katritsis DG, Karabinos I, Papadopoulos A, et al. Sustained ventricular tachycardia Induced by dobutamine stress echocardiography. A prospective study. Europace 2005;7:433-439
23. Lemos PA, Saia F, Ligthart JM, et al. Coronary restenosis after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation: Morphological description and mechanistic analysis from a consecutive series of cases. Circulation 2003;108:257-260.
24. Katritsis DG, Korovesis S, Karabinos I, et al. Sirolimus-versus paclitaxel-eluting stents: A comparison of two consecutive series in routine clinical practice. J Interv Cardiol 2006;19:31-37.
25. Rogers C, Karnovsky MJ, Edelman ER. Inhibition of experimental neointimal hyperplasia and thrombosis depends on the type of vascular injury and the site of drug administration. Circulation 1993;88:1215-1221.
26. Rogers C, Parikh S, Seifert P, Edelman ER. Endogenous cell seeding. Remnant endothelium after stenting enhances vascular repair. Circulation 1996;94:2909-2014.
27. Ioannidis JPA, Karvouni E, Katritsis DG. Mortality risk conferred by small elevations of creatine kinase MB isoenzyme after percutaneous coronary intervention. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003;42:1406-1411.